Enough already! It’s time for our nation’s political leaders to stop talking about raising the federal minimum wage — an idea they’ve loved talking about since 2007, the last time it was raised — and start actually doing something.
When running for president in 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama said, “I won’t be raising the minimum wage every 10 years. We’re going to raise the minimum wage every single year.” But two years later, Sen. Obama was President Obama, and despite Democratic majorities in the House and Senate, the minimum-wage laws remained unchanged.
The president finally moved from talk to action in his State of the Union address this year when he announced that he will use his executive authority to raise the minimum wage for workers on new federal contracts to $10.10 an hour. The decision came after a series of high-profile strikes and demonstrations by employees of federal contractors earning poverty wages, which exposed the administration’s role as a low-road employer. But the executive order — limited in scope — shouldn’t let Congress off the hook for doing right by all workers in this country.
During his speech, the president also urged his colleagues to adopt the proposal of Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, and Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., which calls for updating the federal minimum-wage law by raising the wage from $7.25 to $10.10 an hour. Additionally, their bills would increase the tipped minimum wage from a paltry $2.13 to 70 percent of the regular minimum wage — and, equally important, would give the law teeth by indexing the wage hike to inflation.
Some politicians have been calling for an increase to the federal minimum wage for all workers since 2009, when the last hike was fully phased in. Lawmakers from all over the political spectrum are joining the choir on this issue. “Raising the minimum wage can lift all boats,” said Sen. Robert Casey, the centrist Democrat from Pennsylvania. Republican National Committee member Henry Barbour of Mississippi has suggested that his party should be open to a minimum-wage increase, if only to show the GOP is “sensitized to the worker in America and their needs.” Even Ron Unz, the conservative Republican who ran for governor of California, has called for increasing the minimum wage in that state.
These are all rhetorical steps in the right direction. But the question remains: When are we going to actually pass a law? And not just another incremental, symbolic increase, but one that provides a real, inflation-adjusted livable wage for millions of hardworking people who don’t have enough money in their pockets to take care of basic necessities? Obama’s executive order is a good start, but it’s simply not enough, because it leaves too many other low-wage workers in the dark.
For those of us who care about working people and our economy, raising the federal minimum wage is a no-brainer. It is widely understood to be one of the most effective ways to bring millions of men and women out of the shadows of poverty and into the light of economic opportunity.
On the other hand, inaction means we will all continue to pay the high price of low wages. In the fast-food industry alone, 52 percent of workers rely on aid from taxpayer-funded public programs like food stamps because their wages are too low to make ends meet. According to the Berkeley Labor Center, “The cost of public assistance to families of workers in the fast-food industry is nearly $7 billion per year.” That’s billions of dollars annually coming out of taxpayers’ pockets to subsidize large, hugely profitable corporations that simply don’t want to pay their workers a decent wage.
That’s why we need the law to catch up and require corporations to do the right thing when it comes to paying workers a reasonable wage. The current minimum wage — which was signed into law by President George W. Bush — was set in 2007. So while wages have stayed the same, rent is higher, gas is more expensive, and the price of everything from daycare to a gallon of milk has increased as well.
Enough is enough. The vicious cycle of Republican opposition to a wage increase and the empty promises of reform from Democrats don’t answer the call from workers — including the majority of voters. Many, many Americans want to see the minimum wage increased to help hardworking families put food on the table and keep the lights on. If lawmakers weasel out of raising the minimum wage, or indexing a wage hike, we’re back at square one, dooming ourselves to more and more talking while doing nothing to help millions of American workers.
The Next America welcomes op-ed pieces that explore the political, economic, and social effects of the profound racial and cultural changes facing our nation. Email us. Also, please follow us on Twitter and Facebook.
What We're Following See More »
U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."
President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."
The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.