One Good Idea

Give Public Schools Two Principals

This illustration can only be used with the Molly Mirhashem piece that originally ran in the 4/25/2015 issue of National Journal magazine.
James O'Brien
Molly Mirhashem
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Molly Mirhashem
April 24, 2015, 1 a.m.

Lisa Belzberg, an ad­junct pro­fess­or at Columbia Uni­versity’s School of In­ter­na­tion­al and Pub­lic Af­fairs, has an idea for re­struc­tur­ing pub­lic schools: Di­vide up the prin­cip­al’s job in­to two roles, so that one per­son is in charge of edu­ca­tion and one is in charge of busi­ness. I re­cently spoke with Belzberg — who foun­ded the edu­ca­tion non­profit PEN­CIL, which pro­motes links between busi­nesses and schools — about her pro­pos­al. Our con­ver­sa­tion has been ed­ited and con­densed.

— Molly Mirhashem

Can you ex­plain your idea?

There has been a move in pub­lic-school gov­ernance to­ward de­cent­ral­iz­a­tion: giv­ing a lot of con­trol to in­di­vidu­al prin­cipals. This gives many prin­cipals the re­spons­ib­il­ity to de­vel­op and man­age their own budgets. I be­lieve that pub­lic schools should be op­er­ated more like the good charter schools: Good charter schools are run by two people. There is someone who’s in charge of the edu­ca­tion­al as­pects of the school, and someone in charge of op­er­a­tions. And you have to make sure that the in­struc­tion­al head and the busi­ness man­ager are hired as a team of sorts and are viewed as code­pend­ent part­ners with equal status.

(Il­lus­tra­tion by James O’Bri­en)What spe­cif­ic prob­lem does your idea ad­dress?

Too of­ten our school lead­ers are not trained to be busi­ness man­agers. They are may­ors of small cit­ies in a way. They have to deal with all sorts of is­sues, such as bus­ing, food ser­vices, health and wel­fare, and ab­sent­ee­ism of teach­ers and stu­dents. They have so many is­sues, and they’re not ac­tu­ally trained any­where to deal with them. If you’re a teach­er who gets bumped up to be prin­cip­al be­cause you’re a great teach­er, that doesn’t be­gin to give you the skill set you need. So this gets the edu­cat­or back in­to the classroom and then brings in someone who’s ac­tu­ally trained to be a real busi­ness man­ager. And there’s a very healthy ten­sion between the two.

What do you mean by “healthy ten­sion”?

The edu­cat­or’s role is al­ways to spend more time, money, and en­ergy on pro­fes­sion­al de­vel­op­ment. A good prin­cip­al wants it to be as broad of a com­munity school as it can be, with as many wrap-around ser­vices as it can have. And then you have a busi­ness per­son who says: “We can’t man­age that, be­cause we don’t have the budget for that. We have to fig­ure out how to pri­or­it­ize our money.” And: “I’m sorry you can’t have all of those things. Here are the things I think we can have now.” I love the idea of one be­ing the dream­er, and the oth­er say­ing, “I love your dreams, and here are the ones we can ful­fill now.”

Are there any down­sides to this idea that should be con­sidered?

You have to make sure people aren’t up­set that there’s money be­ing spent on ex­tra ad­min­is­trat­ive po­s­i­tions, which could take away from in­struc­tion­al re­sources. That has to be made up some­how, so there’s no re­sent­ment. And you really have to define roles and re­spons­ib­il­it­ies clearly with the two people.

Is this an idea that’s already float­ing around? What needs to be done to raise more aware­ness of it?

It’s float­ing around a little bit, for sure. If you have a prin­cip­al from a pub­lic school go in to look at a charter, they’ll say, “Oh boy, if only I had that per­son — what I could do with my teach­ers.” So you have it per­col­at­ing from be­low and from the out­side a bit, too. I think there are many steps that can be taken to bring it to the next level. One step is to high­light that it is one of many reas­ons why good charter schools are suc­cess­ful. Also, busi­ness schools should cre­ate both reg­u­lar and ex­ec­ut­ive MBA pro­grams spe­cific­ally tailored to those skills and com­pet­en­cies needed in budget­ing and run­ning a uni­on­ized, mul­ti­fa­ceted pub­lic school. Oth­er steps would in­clude part­ner­ing with in­nov­a­tion labs at busi­ness schools, get­ting busi­ness schools to sign on, and get­ting found­a­tions to pay for it.

How would this be im­ple­men­ted?

I’m a big be­liev­er in start­ing something small, show­ing that it works, and then im­ple­ment­ing it on a lar­ger scale. So it wouldn’t need to be a policy that man­dated that every city did this. Once you see the dif­fer­ence in a few schools, you build a few more un­til you get a crit­ic­al mass.

What We're Following See More »
UN Security Council Condemns N. Korea Launch
34 minutes ago
White House Snubs OGE’s Request for Info on Waivers
3 hours ago

"The Trump administration, in a significant escalation of its clash with the government’s top ethics watchdog, has moved to block an effort to disclose any ethics waivers granted to former lobbyists who now work in the White House or federal agencies." The White House sent a letter to OGE head Walter Shaub, which "challenged his legal authority to demand the information. Dozens of former lobbyists and industry lawyers are working in the Trump administration, which has hired them at a much higher rate than the previous administration. Keeping the waivers confidential would make it impossible to know whether any such officials are violating federal ethics rules or have been given a pass to ignore them."

Turkey Summons U.S. Ambassador
3 hours ago
Court Rules Against NC Voting Districts, Says They Were Racially Motivated
3 hours ago

"The Supreme Court ruled Monday that racial considerations pervaded the way North Carolina lawmakers drew congressional maps after the 2010 Census in order to maximize Republicans' advantage. The 5-3 ruling, written by Justice Elena Kagan, was the latest in a series of decisions by the justices against the excessive use of race in redistricting, the decennial process of drawing new district lines for Congress and state legislatures. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the court's four liberal justices in striking down the state's maps."

SCOTUS Rules Against Venue Shopping in Patent Cases
4 hours ago

Writing for an 8-0 Supreme Court on Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that patent lawsuits "must be brought in the state where the defendant company is incorporated. ... The ruling likely spells an end to the near-monopoly the federal court in the Eastern District of Texas holds in handling patent cases. Plaintiffs for decades have filed suits in that pro-plaintiff district based on a broader interpretation of venue that made suits possible almost anywhere."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.