South Carolina Mixed-Oxide Nuclear Plant Said to Cost Billions More

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 19, 2014, 9:37 a.m.

The fi­nal price tag of a mixed-ox­ide nuc­le­ar fuel fa­cil­ity be­ing built in South Car­o­lina may be as high as $30 bil­lion, an un­re­leased U.S. study con­cludes.

Uniden­ti­fied gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials and in­dustry in­siders who were briefed on the En­ergy De­part­ment study’s find­ings told the Cen­ter for Pub­lic In­teg­rity the pro­jec­ted cost growth for the mixed-ox­ide fuel fab­ric­a­tion plant has led the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to fa­vor pur­su­ing al­tern­at­ives for dis­pos­ing of the 34 tons of weapons-grade plutoni­um that the Sa­van­nah River site was in­ten­ded to handle.

The prob­able fi­nal ex­pense of the con­tro­ver­sial MOX plant would likely be between $25 bil­lion and $30 bil­lion, sources said in the Fri­day art­icle.

Nu­mer­ous of­fi­cials are start­ing to think that “it’s time for a shift­ing of gears,” said an ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial.

However, be­cause no oth­er fully de­veloped op­tion has emerged for deal­ing with the Rus­si­an-ori­gin plutoni­um, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion will prob­ably seek fisc­al 2015 funds to con­tin­ue build­ing the mixed-ox­ide plant. Of­fi­cials said the sought-after fund­ing likely will be less than the roughly $343 mil­lion as­signed for the pro­ject in the cur­rent fisc­al year. A total of $4 bil­lion has already been spent on con­struc­tion.

The U.S. Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion, which is over­see­ing con­struc­tion of the fuel-fab­ric­a­tion plant, de­clined to com­ment on the re­port.

The En­ergy De­part­ment re­portedly is in­volved in drawn-out secret ne­go­ti­ations with Shaw Areva MOX Ser­vices, which is in charge of con­struct­ing and op­er­at­ing the plant. The de­part­ment’s goal is to modi­fy the con­tract with the European con­sor­ti­um so that com­pany profits are lowered and more of the bur­den of cost over­runs is shif­ted onto Shaw Areva’s shoulders.

However, talks are at an im­passe, so the gov­ern­ment is now ex­amin­ing al­tern­at­ives for dis­pos­ing of the sur­plus plutoni­um, sources told the cen­ter.

Rus­si­an of­fi­cials have sug­ges­ted in private dip­lo­mat­ic dis­cus­sions that they would be open to a plan that con­verts the plutoni­um met­al in­to a more pro­lif­er­a­tion-res­ist­ant powder form, which could then be en­tombed deep un­der­ground, an of­fi­cial said. Such a plan could take half a dec­ade to com­plete and cost $6 bil­lion, an un­named source pro­jec­ted in the art­icle.

What We're Following See More »
ON THE CALL: “AT LEAST THAT WAS SACRED”
Gen. Kelly Rips Rep. Wilson for Criticism
19 minutes ago
THE LATEST
GOP FORMER PRES V. GOP CURRENT PRES
Bush Slams Trump, Implicitly
33 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED CONSIDERATION
Senate Rejects Effort to Nix SALT Tax Changes
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Senate Democrats on Thursday failed in their first attempt to save the state and local tax deduction, which helps many residents of California and other high-cost states reduce their federal income tax bills. The Republican-controlled Senate voted 52-47 to reject an amendment that would have prevented the Senate from considering any bill that repeals or limits the deduction as part of a planned tax overhaul."

Source:
MEETING WITH SENATE GOP
Trump to Hill Next Tuesday
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS
INTERPARTY FEUDING CONTINUES UNDER PEREZ
Longtime Progressive Members Pushed Out at DNC
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A shake-up is underway at the Democratic National Committee as several key longtime officials have lost their posts, exposing a still-raw rift in the party and igniting anger among those in its progressive wing who see retaliation for their opposition to DNC Chairman Tom Perez. The ousters come ahead of the DNC's first meeting, in Las Vegas, Nevada, since Perez took over as chairman with a pledge this year to unite a party that had become badly divided during the brutal Bernie Sanders-Hillary Clinton 2016 primary race."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login