The largest private employer in America, a company that possibly recently paid a majority of its employees less than $25,000 annually, is considering supporting an increase in the federal minimum wage.
For Wal-Mart, the move might make a whole lot of sense.
David Tovar, a Wal-Mart spokesman, told Bloomberg Wednesday that his company is “looking at” supporting a federal wage increase. “Whenever there’s debates,” he said, “it’s not like we look once and make a decision. We look a few times from other angles.” For now, the company remains neutral.
Tovar did give one reason why the company might support an increase. Boosting the wage, he said, would mean that some Walmart shoppers would “now have additional income” to spend at the store. At the same time, “it’s really hard to model behavior based on these kinds of changes,” Tovar told Bloomberg.
Wal-Mart has a total of 1.3 million U.S. employees. About 300,000 of those employees earn an average of $8.75 an hour, according to Berkeley’s Labor Research Center. Boosting the federal minimum to $10.10 an hour from the current $7.25, which is the proposal from President Obama and Senate Democrats, could have a big impact just from the store’s own employees.
Some economists are on board with the idea. “If suddenly all these low-wage workers have more income, they are likely to spend that money right away,” David Cooper of the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute told The Huffington Post last fall. “If an employee at McDonald’s or Pizza Hut suddenly has additional income,” he said, “they could spend it at Walmart.”
There’s not yet enough data out there to suggest the move would work, and Wal-Mart would most likely want to have more to go on than just the opinion of a few wage-increase advocates. But for a company with a problematic image when it comes to how it treats its workers, backing a change here could be a gain in itself. CVS isn’t the only U.S. mega-store capable of making a big PR move that could come with serious up-front costs.
And Wal-Mart wouldn’t be alone in rushing out ahead of a possible federal increase: On Wednesday, Gap announced that the company would increase its own minimum wage to $10 an hour by June 2015. That decision will impact about 65,000 U.S. employees. “Our decision to invest in frontline employees will directly support our business, and is one that we expect to deliver a return many times over,” said the company’s CEO.
Supporting an increase also wouldn’t be a first for Wal-Mart. Back in 2005, CEO Lee Scott urged Congress to raise the federal wage from $5.15 an hour. “We can see first-hand at Wal-Mart how many of our customers are struggling to get by,” Scott said then. “Our customers simply don’t have the money to buy basic necessities between pay checks.” Congress eventually began a series of wage increases, which first took effect in 2007 and culminated in an increase to $7.25 starting in 2009.
A decade ago, Wal-Mart went all in on the argument that it could be a winner as a result of a wage increase. There’s no reason to think the company can’t do it again now.
What We're Following See More »
"Congressional negotiators released a stopgap spending bill Tuesday night to avert a partial government shutdown at midnight Friday and to fund federal agencies and programs through April 28." The 70-page continuing resolution includes $170 million to aid Flint, Michigan's water supply, and a waiver that would allow Ret. Gen. James Mattis to assume the role of secretary of Defense.
"A number of Capitol Hill Democrats have revived proposals to reform or abolish the Electoral College," chief among Michigan's John Conyers, who "held a panel on Capitol Hill Tuesday to discuss options for eliminating the Electoral College and replacing it with a system where a national popular vote elects the president. ... The plan with the most support to reform the election college at the panel was the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, a proposal first developed in 2001 that would give the national popular vote winner the majority of electoral college votes through an agreement between the states."
House Speaker Paul Ryan has decreed that House members "won’t receive their committee assignments until January — after they cast a public vote on the House floor for speaker. "The move has sparked behind-the-scenes grumbling from a handful of Ryan critics, who say the delay allows him and the Speaker-aligned Steering Committee to dole out committee assignments based on political loyalty rather than merit or expertise." The roll call to elect the speaker is set for Jan. 3, the first vote of the new Congress.
House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told reporters on Monday that the government funding bill will be released on Tuesday. The bill is the last piece of legislation Congress needs to pass before leaving for the year and is expected to fund the government through the spring. The exact time date the bill would fund the government through is unclear, though it is expected to be in April or May.