The largest private employer in America, a company that possibly recently paid a majority of its employees less than $25,000 annually, is considering supporting an increase in the federal minimum wage.
For Wal-Mart, the move might make a whole lot of sense.
David Tovar, a Wal-Mart spokesman, told Bloomberg Wednesday that his company is “looking at” supporting a federal wage increase. “Whenever there’s debates,” he said, “it’s not like we look once and make a decision. We look a few times from other angles.” For now, the company remains neutral.
Tovar did give one reason why the company might support an increase. Boosting the wage, he said, would mean that some Walmart shoppers would “now have additional income” to spend at the store. At the same time, “it’s really hard to model behavior based on these kinds of changes,” Tovar told Bloomberg.
Wal-Mart has a total of 1.3 million U.S. employees. About 300,000 of those employees earn an average of $8.75 an hour, according to Berkeley’s Labor Research Center. Boosting the federal minimum to $10.10 an hour from the current $7.25, which is the proposal from President Obama and Senate Democrats, could have a big impact just from the store’s own employees.
Some economists are on board with the idea. “If suddenly all these low-wage workers have more income, they are likely to spend that money right away,” David Cooper of the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute told The Huffington Post last fall. “If an employee at McDonald’s or Pizza Hut suddenly has additional income,” he said, “they could spend it at Walmart.”
There’s not yet enough data out there to suggest the move would work, and Wal-Mart would most likely want to have more to go on than just the opinion of a few wage-increase advocates. But for a company with a problematic image when it comes to how it treats its workers, backing a change here could be a gain in itself. CVS isn’t the only U.S. mega-store capable of making a big PR move that could come with serious up-front costs.
And Wal-Mart wouldn’t be alone in rushing out ahead of a possible federal increase: On Wednesday, Gap announced that the company would increase its own minimum wage to $10 an hour by June 2015. That decision will impact about 65,000 U.S. employees. “Our decision to invest in frontline employees will directly support our business, and is one that we expect to deliver a return many times over,” said the company’s CEO.
Supporting an increase also wouldn’t be a first for Wal-Mart. Back in 2005, CEO Lee Scott urged Congress to raise the federal wage from $5.15 an hour. “We can see first-hand at Wal-Mart how many of our customers are struggling to get by,” Scott said then. “Our customers simply don’t have the money to buy basic necessities between pay checks.” Congress eventually began a series of wage increases, which first took effect in 2007 and culminated in an increase to $7.25 starting in 2009.
A decade ago, Wal-Mart went all in on the argument that it could be a winner as a result of a wage increase. There’s no reason to think the company can’t do it again now.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.