Why Wal-Mart May Move to Support Minimum-Wage Hike

The company may have a lot to gain from a federal increase.

Demonstrators march and block traffic in a major intersection outside a Walmart store during rush hour September 5, 2013 in Hyattsville, Maryland.
National Journal
Matt Berman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Feb. 20, 2014, midnight

The largest private em­ploy­er in Amer­ica, a com­pany that pos­sibly re­cently paid a ma­jor­ity of its em­ploy­ees less than $25,000 an­nu­ally, is con­sid­er­ing sup­port­ing an in­crease in the fed­er­al min­im­um wage.

For Wal-Mart, the move might make a whole lot of sense.

Dav­id To­var, a Wal-Mart spokes­man, told Bloomberg Wed­nes­day that his com­pany is “look­ing at” sup­port­ing a fed­er­al wage in­crease. “Whenev­er there’s de­bates,” he said, “it’s not like we look once and make a de­cision. We look a few times from oth­er angles.” For now, the com­pany re­mains neut­ral.

To­var did give one reas­on why the com­pany might sup­port an in­crease. Boost­ing the wage, he said, would mean that some Wal­mart shop­pers would “now have ad­di­tion­al in­come” to spend at the store. At the same time, “it’s really hard to mod­el be­ha­vi­or based on these kinds of changes,” To­var told Bloomberg.

Wal-Mart has a total of 1.3 mil­lion U.S. em­ploy­ees. About 300,000 of those em­ploy­ees earn an av­er­age of $8.75 an hour, ac­cord­ing to Berke­ley’s Labor Re­search Cen­ter. Boost­ing the fed­er­al min­im­um to $10.10 an hour from the cur­rent $7.25, which is the pro­pos­al from Pres­id­ent Obama and Sen­ate Demo­crats, could have a big im­pact just from the store’s own em­ploy­ees.

Some eco­nom­ists are on board with the idea. “If sud­denly all these low-wage work­ers have more in­come, they are likely to spend that money right away,” Dav­id Cooper of the left-lean­ing Eco­nom­ic Policy In­sti­tute told The Huff­ing­ton Post last fall. “If an em­ploy­ee at Mc­Don­ald’s or Pizza Hut sud­denly has ad­di­tion­al in­come,” he said, “they could spend it at Wal­mart.”

There’s not yet enough data out there to sug­gest the move would work, and Wal-Mart would most likely want to have more to go on than just the opin­ion of a few wage-in­crease ad­voc­ates. But for a com­pany with a prob­lem­at­ic im­age when it comes to how it treats its work­ers, back­ing a change here could be a gain in it­self. CVS isn’t the only U.S. mega-store cap­able of mak­ing a big PR move that could come with ser­i­ous up-front costs.

And Wal-Mart wouldn’t be alone in rush­ing out ahead of a pos­sible fed­er­al in­crease: On Wed­nes­day, Gap an­nounced that the com­pany would in­crease its own min­im­um wage to $10 an hour by June 2015. That de­cision will im­pact about 65,000 U.S. em­ploy­ees. “Our de­cision to in­vest in front­line em­ploy­ees will dir­ectly sup­port our busi­ness, and is one that we ex­pect to de­liv­er a re­turn many times over,” said the com­pany’s CEO.

Sup­port­ing an in­crease also wouldn’t be a first for Wal-Mart. Back in 2005, CEO Lee Scott urged Con­gress to raise the fed­er­al wage from $5.15 an hour. “We can see first-hand at Wal-Mart how many of our cus­tom­ers are strug­gling to get by,” Scott said then. “Our cus­tom­ers simply don’t have the money to buy ba­sic ne­ces­sit­ies between pay checks.” Con­gress even­tu­ally began a series of wage in­creases, which first took ef­fect in 2007 and cul­min­ated in an in­crease to $7.25 start­ing in 2009.

A dec­ade ago, Wal-Mart went all in on the ar­gu­ment that it could be a win­ner as a res­ult of a wage in­crease. There’s no reas­on to think the com­pany can’t do it again now.

What We're Following See More »
INTERVIEW THIS WEEK
Trump Still Considering Yellen For Fed
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump plans to formally interview Janet Yellen this week about potentially staying on as Federal Reserve chair, two people familiar with the matter said...Many Republicans on Capitol Hill want Trump to move on from Yellen, whose first term ends in February, and choose a more traditionally conservative Fed chair."

Source:
NOMINEE FOR ONDCP
Trump Noncommittal on Marino
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS
IN LIGHT OF 60 MINUTES REVELATIONS
Manchin Asks Trump to Drop Marino’s Nomination for Drug Czar
7 hours ago
THE LATEST
WOULD OVERTURN MARINO LEGISLATION ON DRUG DISTRIBUTORS
McCaskill Will Introduce Bill in Response to “60 Minutes” Scoop
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In the wake of Sunday's blockbuster 60 Minutes/Washington Post report on opioid regulation and enforcement, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) has introduced legislation that "would repeal a 2016 law that hampered the Drug Enforcement Administration’s ability to regulate opioid distributors it suspects of misconduct." In a statement, McCaskill said: “Media reports indicate that this law has significantly affected the government’s ability to crack down on opioid distributors that are failing to meet their obligations and endangering our communities."

Source:
MCDONNELL PRECEDENT DOESN’T GET HIM OFF THE HOOK … YET
Judge Refuses to Dismiss Charges Against Menendez
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The judge overseeing in U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez’s case says he won’t dismiss any charges against the New Jersey Democrat. Judge William Walls ruled against defense lawyers’ arguments that the charges should be dropped because they didn’t meet a narrower definition of bribery under a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that reversed the conviction of Republican former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login