Hillary Clinton: Cyber Legislation in Congress Is ‘Not Enough’ to Stop Foreign Hackers

“It’s not only the Chinese. We know that other governments — Russia, North Korea, Iran — have either directly or indirectly sponsored hacking.”

Hillary Clinton speaks at an organizing event at a private home July 4, 2015 in Glen, New Hampshire. 
Darren McCollester/Getty Images
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
July 7, 2015, 12:56 p.m.

Pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate Hil­lary Clin­ton on Tues­day said that stalled cy­ber­se­cur­ity le­gis­la­tion in Con­gress “doesn’t go far enough” to pro­tect the U.S. from de­bil­it­at­ing hacks sponsored by a cadre of for­eign coun­tries.

Dur­ing a brief ques­tion-and-an­swer ses­sion with the press in Iowa, the front-run­ner for the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion ex­pan­ded to four the list of coun­tries she has pub­licly charged with wa­ging cy­ber­war­fare that rep­res­ents a ser­i­ous com­mer­cial and na­tion­al se­cur­ity threat

“It’s not only the Chinese. We know that oth­er gov­ern­ments — Rus­sia, North Korea, Ir­an — have either dir­ectly or in­dir­ectly sponsored hack­ing,” the former sec­ret­ary of State said. “And we worry about ter­ror­ist or­gan­iz­a­tions get­ting ac­cess to the ca­pa­city.”

Clin­ton — who grabbed head­lines over the week­end by as­sail­ing China for “try­ing to hack in­to everything that doesn’t move” — ad­ded that le­gis­la­tion to ex­pand the shar­ing of “cy­ber­threat data” alone between the gov­ern­ment and private sec­tor is not enough to thwart ma­li­cious activ­ity.

“We’ve been try­ing to get a good plan go­ing for­ward; we’re mak­ing a little bit of pro­gress on that in the Con­gress. It is, for me, not enough,” Clin­ton said. “It doesn’t go far enough to try to have bet­ter co­ordin­a­tion between the pub­lic and private sec­tor.”

Clin­ton lis­ted “cum­ber­some pro­cure­ment and bur­eau­crat­ic obstacles with­in the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment” as oth­er obstacles in­hib­it­ing cy­ber­se­cur­ity, ref­er­en­cing the rocky roll-out of Health­Care.gov in 2013 as evid­ence that gov­ern­ment is in need of a tech­no­lo­gic­al over­haul that in­cludes a more stream­lined pro­cess for work­ing with IT con­tract­ors.

Clin­ton did not cla­ri­fy which spe­cif­ic info-shar­ing le­gis­la­tion she was re­fer­ring to, however — or wheth­er it alone would be a use­ful step for­ward. Two sim­il­ar info-shar­ing bills eas­ily passed the House earli­er this year, and a Sen­ate ver­sion, known as the Cy­ber­se­cur­ity In­form­a­tion Shar­ing Act, has stalled after clear­ing the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee on a 14-1 vote. A plan by Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell to at­tach CISA as an amend­ment to a de­fens­ive au­thor­iz­a­tion bill back­fired last month be­cause Demo­crats re­fused to sup­port it due to pro­ced­ur­al con­cerns.

Pri­vacy ad­voc­ates and many com­puter ex­perts have warned that ex­pand­ing in­form­a­tion-shar­ing would not do much to pre­vent or min­im­ize cy­ber­at­tacks, and that such le­gis­la­tion could ac­tu­ally em­bolden gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance by hand­ing more data over to the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency.

Gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials have privately poin­ted to China as the cul­prit be­hind a massive data breach of per­son­nel files at the Of­fice of Per­son­nel Man­age­ment, a hack that has af­fected mil­lions of cur­rent and former fed­er­al em­ploy­ees. Some law­makers have also said China is to blame, al­though the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion con­tin­ues to res­ist ac­cus­ing Beijing pub­licly.

Clin­ton’s com­ments are her most de­tailed about cy­ber­se­cur­ity since of­fi­cially de­clar­ing her White House bid nearly three months ago. She said Tues­day that her con­cerns about for­eign na­tions hack­ing the U.S. date back to her ten­ure as sec­ret­ary of State.

“It star­ted with the grave con­cerns that a lot of Amer­ic­an busi­nesses had, that their most con­fid­en­tial in­form­a­tion was be­ing va­cu­umed up through in­trus­ive hack­ing,” Clin­ton said. “It’s a ser­i­ous threat to our com­mer­cial in­terests, to our in­tel­li­gence in­terests, to our stra­tegic in­terests.”

What We're Following See More »
Sen. Graham Supporting Sessions
3 hours ago

"Sen. Lindsay Graham said he is '100 percent behind' embattled Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and said there would be 'holy hell to pay' if President Donald Trump fires him. Graham also said that if the president went after special prosecutor Robert Mueller, who’s directing the investigation into possible contacts between Trump’s circle and Russia, that could be the 'beginning of the end of the Trump presidency, unless Mueller did something wrong.'"

Sanders New WH Press Secretary
4 hours ago

"With little pomp or circumstance, Sarah Huckabee Sanders stepped up to the briefing room podium and got straight to business Friday, reading announcements about "Made in America Week" and a new executive order on defense. Minutes later, newly minted communications director Anthony Scaramucci announced she was formally taking over as White House press secretary. In the aftermath of a chaotic communications staff shakeup at the White House last week, there was little attention paid to a new milestone as Sanders assumed the role."

No Instructions to Pentagon, No Change in Transgender Policy
5 hours ago

"The highest ranking military officer in the country said that the military’s transgender policy won’t actively change until President Trump sends specific directions to the Pentagon. 'There will be no modifications to the current policy until the president’s direction has been received by the secretary of defense and the secretary has issued implementation guidance,' Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford wrote in a letter."

FLOTUS First Trip Solo
5 hours ago
Two of Trump’s Top Advisors Feuding
6 hours ago

"A long-simmering feud between two of President Trump’s top advisers reached a boiling point Thursday, as White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci publicly insinuated that chief of staff Reince Priebus is a leaker."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.