If it accomplished anything at all, the recent evolution-versus-creation debate between Bill Nye (science guy) and Ken Ham (creationist guy) reinforced this idea: that science and religion are impossibley at odds, that Nye and Ham are speakers of two different languages, incomprehensible to one another.
But that impression — that the population is stubbornly sorted into science people and religious/creation people — is not accurate.
A recent survey of 10,000 individuals of many religious backgrounds found that only 27 percent felt science and religion were at odds with each other. Furthermore, 48 percent of respondents who identified as evangelicals said that science and religion can collaborate with one another. Pew Research found similar results in 2009. “Only 48 percent of those who attend religious services at least once a week see a conflict,” that study noted.
The chart below is adapted from the survey. Notice that more than half of those who identified as “Evangelical Protestant” hold a belief that meshes science and religion on the question of human origins.
The sticking points for evangelical creationists, though, are particularly sticky. For instance, 42 percent of evangelicals strongly believe creationism should be taught instead of evolution in schools. An additional 25 percent say it should be taught alongside it.
But the bottom line is this: Framing the debate between science and religion as binary is not right. It’s more of a continuum of belief. “The emphasis on human origins has narrowed the conversation,” the survey concludes.
“It would serve us well to remember the topics on which there is greater agreement or openness to collaboration, such that a framework of trust and mutual respect might develop between these two communities,” the authors write.Create Infographics
What We're Following See More »
"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”
Hillary Clinton's transition team has in place strict rules to limit the influence that lobbyists could have "in crafting the nominee’s policy agenda." The move makes it unlikely, at least for now, that Clinton would overturn Obama's executive order limiting the role that lobbyists play in government
Priorities USA, the super PAC aligned with the Clinton campaign, which has already gotten involved in two Senate races, is now expanding into House races. The group released a 30 second spot which serves to hit Donald Trump and Iowa Rep. Rod Blum, who is in a tough race to win re-election in Iowa's first congressional district. The super PAC's expansion into House and Senate races shows a high level of confidence in Clinton's standing against Trump.