Opinion

Concrete Steps Can Reduce Inequality

A minimum-wage hike, better preschools, apprenticeships, paid family leave, and a low-cost retirement savings plan can change the course for those Latinos overrepresented in low-wage occupations.

Ben Olinsky, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, focuses on economic issues. He holds a political science degree from Yale University.
National Journal
Ben Olinsky
Add to Briefcase
Ben Olinsky
Feb. 25, 2014, 11:55 p.m.

Let’s face it: Most of us dream of a world where in­equal­ity would be a for­eign concept. Un­for­tu­nately for us, in­equal­ity is our real­ity. We can see in­equal­ity every­where, while walk­ing down the street or go­ing to the mall. For Lati­nos in the United States, eco­nom­ic in­equal­ity can be seen in the His­pan­ic poverty rate, which re­mains stub­bornly high at 25.6 per­cent com­pared with the 9.7 per­cent poverty rate for whites.

While these num­bers may seem quite dis­cour­aging, it is im­port­ant to keep in mind that we can take con­crete steps to de­crease in­equal­ity and re­store an eco­nomy that works for every­one, not just the wealthy.

As Pres­id­ent Obama men­tioned in his State of the Uni­on ad­dress, fo­cus­ing on in­creas­ing eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­ity in the United States, both in the short and long term, will be a pri­or­ity in 2014. This past Decem­ber, Pres­id­ent Obama ex­plained his views on in­equal­ity in a speech presen­ted by the Cen­ter for Amer­ic­an Pro­gress, ar­guing that re­du­cing in­equal­ity goes hand in hand with work­ing to im­prove the coun­try’s eco­nomy. In fact, the pres­id­ent re­minded us that there is good evid­ence that the eco­nomy grows best when the en­tire pop­u­la­tion be­ne­fits, not just some parts of our so­ci­ety.

There are sev­er­al key policies that the U.S. could ad­opt that would put this goal with­in reach, start­ing with pro­pos­als to in­crease the min­im­um wage from $7.25 to $10.10 and set­ting it to auto­mat­ic­ally in­crease over time. Do­ing so would dir­ectly ad­dress in­equal­ity and would dis­pro­por­tion­ately be­ne­fit Lati­nos, who are overrep­res­en­ted in low-wage oc­cu­pa­tions. Al­though CEOs’ salar­ies have gone up dra­mat­ic­ally, earn­ing 273 times more today than av­er­age work­ers, the wages of av­er­age work­ers have been stag­nant. In­creas­ing the min­im­um wage will help de­crease this gap.

The math is simple: When em­ploy­ees are paid more, they spend more, thus in­creas­ing the de­mand for goods. This, in turn, leads com­pan­ies and busi­nesses to do bet­ter, al­low­ing them to hire more work­ers and to pay high­er wages.

As the pres­id­ent also men­tioned in the State of the Uni­on, mak­ing sure that all chil­dren can at­tend high-qual­ity preschool is in­cred­ibly im­port­ant to their lifelong suc­cess. Ac­cord­ing to re­search, about half of the dif­fer­ence in high school achieve­ment can be ex­plained by a child’s ex­per­i­ences be­fore the age of 5. Ac­cess to high-qual­ity preschool is es­pe­cially im­port­ant for low-in­come chil­dren of col­or, who of­ten be­gin kinder­garten be­hind their peers. By provid­ing ac­cess to high-qual­ity preschools, we can give all chil­dren the ne­ces­sary skills to suc­ceed in school, gradu­ate from high school and col­lege, and have bet­ter op­por­tun­it­ies to find and keep jobs that pay well as adults.

We also must cre­ate more op­por­tun­it­ies for all stu­dents to learn and gain mar­ket­able skills after high school. One way to do this is by cre­at­ing more ap­pren­tice­ships op­por­tun­it­ies, where young adults and stu­dents can earn an in­come, gain work ex­per­i­ence, get train­ing, even earn col­lege cred­it. Re­search has shown that com­pared to work­ers who have not done ap­pren­tice­ships, those who com­plete an ap­pren­tice­ship earn an av­er­age of $300,000 more in wages and oth­er be­ne­fits over their life­times.

Ap­pren­tice­ships also help com­pan­ies by provid­ing skilled and ex­per­i­enced work­ers to fill pro­jec­ted job open­ings. And the time has come for us to give stu­dents the op­por­tun­ity to re­fin­ance stu­dent loans, which will in­crease re­pay­ment, free­ing up that money to be spent in oth­er ways that could boost the eco­nomy.

One of the most im­port­ant ways we can be­gin fight­ing in­equal­ity is to con­cen­trate on people’s lives at home and of­fer­ing paid fam­ily leave for every­one. Today, only 12 per­cent of work­ers have paid fam­ily leave through their em­ploy­ers, and low-wage work­ers are par­tic­u­larly un­likely to have it. We can start to level the play­ing field by giv­ing all par­ents — not just the lucky few — bet­ter op­por­tun­it­ies to care for their chil­dren, which can res­ult in bet­ter suc­cess in school.

Fi­nally, with only half of all Amer­ic­ans hav­ing a re­tire­ment plan at work, we have to com­bat in­come in­equal­ity in re­tire­ment. To do so, we should give all work­ers a new low-cost op­tion to save for re­tire­ment that would en­joy low fees, pooled risk, and pro­fes­sion­al fund man­age­ment. We should also change how the tax code works so the wealthy do not get bet­ter tax breaks than low-in­come fam­il­ies to save for re­tire­ment.

It won’t be easy to turn back in­equal­ity, but there are steps we can take now to move in the right dir­ec­tion. If we can cre­ate an eco­nomy that works for all Amer­ic­ans, we can un­leash our full eco­nom­ic po­ten­tial. Let’s give work­ing Amer­ic­ans a raise, chil­dren the sup­port and edu­ca­tion they need, young adults the skills that can help them land a good middle class job, and work­ers the chance to save for re­tire­ment. As Pres­id­ent Obama ex­plained, if we work to­geth­er, we won’t just cre­ate a more equal so­ci­ety, we’ll cre­ate a more pros­per­ous one as well.

AN OPIN­ION ON POLICY AND CHAN­GING DEMO­GRAPH­ICS?

The Next Amer­ica wel­comes op-ed pieces that ex­plore the polit­ic­al, eco­nom­ic and so­cial im­pacts of the pro­found ra­cial and cul­tur­al changes fa­cing our na­tion, par­tic­u­larly rel­ev­ant to edu­ca­tion, eco­nomy, the work­force and health. Email us. Please fol­low us on Twit­ter and Face­book.

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Bannon Still Collecting Royalties from ‘Seinfeld’
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."

Source:
×