Off to the Races

GOP Establishment in a Tizzy

After Rubio’s robotic debate, no mainstream candidate looks ready to pull away.

Marco Rubio stumbles in New Hampshire
AP Photo/John Locher
Charlie Cook
Add to Briefcase
Charlie Cook
Feb. 8, 2016, 8 p.m.

For lead­ers of the Re­pub­lic­an es­tab­lish­ment, things could not look much worse. They des­per­ately need one of the four con­ven­tion­al, main­stream can­did­ates—Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, John Kasich, or Marco Ru­bio—to pull away and con­sol­id­ate that wing of the party, the way Ted Cruz has done on the Right. But after Ru­bio’s ro­bot­ic de­bate show­ing, it looks less likely now that the New Hamp­shire primary will win­now the field as much as they hoped.

We will all know a lot more by Tues­day night, but a few things are already ap­par­ent. While Don­ald Trump will al­most cer­tainly win the New Hamp­shire primary, he is not go­ing to dom­in­ate it or many oth­er places the way polls were show­ing just a month or two ago. Trump was av­er­aging about 35 per­cent of the GOP vote in Iowa, New Hamp­shire, and na­tion­ally, mean­ing that 65 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans were not for the bom­bast­ic real-es­tate mogul. Pre­sum­ably his sup­port­ers were fa­mil­i­ar with him, and they liked at least some of what he said, the way he said it, and the way he po­si­tioned him­self as an anti-politi­cian can­did­ate. That is still true, but knock about 10 points off his poll num­bers. He’s av­er­aging about 25 per­cent, with 75 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans not for him. So this is no longer Trump versus the field; this is just a steady Trump with about a quarter of the vote.

Ru­mors of the de­mise of Ben Car­son’s can­did­acy were pre­ma­ture, though ul­ti­mately not wrong. He is no longer a ma­jor factor in the race; he just hasn’t dropped out as Mike Hucka­bee, Rand Paul, and Rick San­tor­um have.

Es­tab­lish­ment Re­pub­lic­ans ser­i­ously doubt that Trump could win a gen­er­al elec­tion. Even if he did, they don’t think he has the faintest idea how to gov­ern or the tem­pera­ment to deal with Con­gress and world lead­ers. Mak­ing mat­ters worse, he has a simplist­ic and shal­low un­der­stand­ing of is­sues and pub­lic policy. But for all of the con­tempt they have for Trump, those same es­tab­lish­ment fig­ures des­pise Cruz. In 43 years in Wash­ing­ton, all on and around Cap­it­ol Hill, I have nev­er seen any­one ali­en­ate more people, in both cham­bers and on both sides of the aisle, more deeply than Cruz has. He thought it polit­ic­ally be­ne­fi­cial to ant­ag­on­ize the es­tab­lish­ment, and he did an amaz­ingly ef­fect­ive job of it, too well for his own good. So the es­tab­lish­ment is now faced with a po­ten­tial choice of shoot­ing it­self in the head or stabbing it­self in the heart (you can de­cide which man rep­res­ents each op­tion).  

None of the can­did­ates favored by the es­tab­lish­ment seems cap­able of pulling away from the oth­er three. After his sur­pris­ingly strong show­ing in Iowa, Ru­bio looked like he might do it, but his shock­ingly bad de­bate per­form­ance Sat­urday night squelched his mo­mentum in New Hamp­shire, and track­ing polls show him los­ing alti­tude. The same polling is show­ing both Bush and Kasich mov­ing up and passing Ru­bio. Christie’s strong de­bate per­form­ance and the abund­ance of late-de­cid­ing voters pre­clude writ­ing him off either.  

How much win­now­ing oc­curs de­pends on who comes in first among the four con­ven­tion­al can­did­ates, who is second, the size of the gap between the two, and wheth­er the third and fourth can­did­ates are in hail­ing range. Ru­bio will cer­tainly sur­vive New Hamp­shire, but for the oth­er three, it’s now or nev­er.

Ru­bio’s chal­lenge is how to re­gain his foot­ing as a smooth, ar­tic­u­late can­did­ate without ap­pear­ing overly pro­grammed. In the de­bate, he was a hu­man juke­box: Hit C-7 and you knew ex­actly what you’d hear. Staffers and con­sult­ants prize a can­did­ate who stays on mes­sage, but not to the point of sound­ing scrip­ted or ro­bot­ic. At a small din­ner that a group of us had with Ru­bio early last year, he came across as smart, poised, and dis­cip­lined, but a little too well-re­hearsed, a little too canned. At a sim­il­ar small din­ner in Ju­ly with Cruz, he was dis­cip­lined as well, but you could al­most see the wheels turn­ing in his head as he for­mu­lated an­swers. Noth­ing was canned with him.

If the es­tab­lish­ment doesn’t co­alesce be­hind a can­did­ate soon, it will have to fig­ure out a way to make peace with Cruz. He’d be hard to love, but pos­sible to tol­er­ate.

What We're Following See More »
LOTS TO DISCUSS
European Commission President to Visit White House
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

With President Trump back from a trip in which he seemed to undermine European alliances while cozying up to Vladimir Putin, the White House has announced that European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker will visit on July 25. According to a statement, the two "will focus on improving transatlantic trade and forging a stronger economic partnership."

501(c)4 GROUPS AFFECTED
IRS Relaxes Reporting Rules for Dark Money Groups
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS
POOR REVIEWS HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC
House Launches Investigation Into VA Nursing Homes
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The House Veterans Affairs Committee has launched an investigation into care at the VA’s 133 nursing homes after learning the agency had given almost half of them the lowest possible score in secret, internal rankings. The probe follows an investigation by The Boston Globe and USA TODAY that showed 60 VA nursing homes ... rated only one out of five stars for quality last year in the agency’s own ranking system." Internal documents revealed that "patients in more than two-thirds of VA nursing homes were more likely to suffer pain and serious bedsores than their private sector counterparts, and that "VA nursing homes scored worse than private nursing homes on a majority of key quality indicators, including rates of anti-psychotic drug prescription and decline in daily living skills."

Source:
"LIGHT-TOUCH" REGULATION
House Republican Introduces Net Neutrality Legislation
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Colorado Representative Mike Coffman has introduced a bill "that would codify free internet regulations into law" by instituting the "basic outlines of the Federal Communication Commission’s 2015 Open Internet order." Coffman's bill amends the 1934 Telecommunications Act by "banning providers from controlling traffic quality and speed and forbidding them from participating in paid prioritization programs or charging access fees from edge providers." The GOP congressman has also "signed on to a Democrat-led effort to reinstate the net neutrality rules that the FCC voted to repeal late last year."

Source:
LINKED TO NRA
DOJ Indicts Another Russian National
21 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login