This week, Maryland gubernatorial candidate Doug Gansler did something that’s going to sound familiar: He compared the shift in public opinion on marijuana legalization to the shift in opinion on gay marriage.
“The collective body of intelligence was that this is wrong to do this, we’re not doing this right; let’s not deny people their fundamental right to happiness,” said Gansler of America’s quickly evolving stance on marriage equality. “I think a similar kind of trend is happening with marijuana.”
What’s less familiar? The sentiment is coming from the state’s top law enforcement official.
Speaking at The Baltimore Sun‘s Newsmaker Forum, Gansler, Maryland’s sitting attorney general, proceeded to make the case that marijuana reform is more-or-less inevitable. “Will we end up getting to legalization? I think we will. My view is, though, it ought to be done very incrementally and in lockstep and make sure we do it the right way. Because once you go too far you can’t go back.”
The backdrop is a primary campaign in which one of Gansler’s opponents, dark-horse candidate Heather Mizeur, a state delegate, has backed full legalization. And another candidate, Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown, has joined her in pushing for a state decriminalization measure that would reduce penalties for carrying an ounce of weed to a $100 fine and no jail time. (Under current law, people caught with under 10 grams of the stuff can be fined up to $500 and given 90 days in jail.) Mizeur has said Brown’s stance, while welcome, doesn’t go far enough.
Not one to be left behind, Gansler now says he too believes in decriminalization for small amounts of marijuana, as well as legalization of medical marijuana, though he balked at full legalization. The significance isn’t lost on pot advocacy groups.
“I think the fact that all three candidates seeking the Democratic nomination have found it beneficial to tout their marijuana-reform credentials speaks volumes about how far the discussion on this issue has come in just a few short years,” said pro-legalization group Marijuana Majority’s Tom Angell. “Just a couple election cycles ago, we’d consider ourselves lucky to get one candidate in a race who was willing to publicly say that maybe we should take another look at the marijuana laws, and those comments would often come from those who some might call ‘fringe candidates.’”
Watch Gansler’s full interview with The Baltimore Sun (the bit about marijuana comes just after the 24-minute mark):
What We're Following See More »
The White House on Wednesday laid out its plan for tax reform, with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin saying it would be "the biggest tax cut and the largest tax reform in the history of our country." The tax code would be broken down into just three tax brackets, with the highest personal income tax rate cut from 39.6 percent to 35 percent. The plan would also slash the tax rate on corporations and small businesses from 35 percent to 15 percent. "The White House plan is a set of principles with few details, but it’s designed to be the starting point of a major push to urge Congress to pass a comprehensive tax reform package this year," said National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."
The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.