My View

How a Simple Test Can Save 120,000 Lives

Hepatitis C, the “silent epidemic” afflicting baby boomers, is twice as prevalent among African-Americans, but preventive measures may save $2.5 billion in health care costs, a CDC official says.

John Ward directs the CDC's Division of Viral Hepatitis. He earned his bachelor's from the University of Alabama in biology and history and his M.D. from UA-Birmingham.
National Journal
John Ward
Add to Briefcase
John Ward
Feb. 27, 2014, 5:36 a.m.

John Ward, 58, has spent his ca­reer at the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion, start­ing in 1984 work­ing on AIDS, then as ed­it­or of the Mor­bid­ity and Mor­tal­ity Weekly Re­port, and since 2005 as dir­ect­or of the vir­al hep­at­it­is di­vi­sion.

In this role, the Alabama nat­ive and his team lead an ef­fort to im­ple­ment a simple test to de­tect hep­at­it­is C, a vir­us iden­ti­fied 25 years ago that of­ten gives rise to liv­er dis­ease and is most pre­val­ent among Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans.

This in­ter­view, con­duc­ted by Jody Bran­non, has been ed­ited for length and clar­ity.

I’ve been in­ter­ested in com­mu­nic­able dis­eases throughout my ca­reer at CDC, and after the long-stand­ing di­vi­sion dir­ect­or left, I was for­tu­nate to be se­lec­ted to lead our work against a group of dis­eases trans­mit­ted in mul­tiple ways.

When we got here, we began to draw at­ten­tion to what’s been called a si­lent epi­dem­ic — 3.5 mil­lion to 5.3 mil­lion people liv­ing with hep­at­it­is, of B or C type — in­fec­ted in dif­fer­ent ways and now liv­ing with it for dec­ades. We began to see a rising rate of liv­er can­cer — a great ma­jor­ity caused by hep­at­it­is — and rising num­bers of deaths from it.

It af­fects Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans dis­pro­por­tion­ately. They have twice the rate of death from hep­at­it­is C as white Amer­ic­ans, and they have twice as high a rate of in­fec­tion. So we have called at­ten­tion to test­ing the baby-boomer gen­er­a­tion for hep­at­it­is C — people born from 1945 to 1965 — be­cause that pop­u­la­tion were young adults be­fore this vir­us was found in 1989 and be­fore pre­ven­tion meas­ures were put in place. They may have been ex­posed to hep­at­it­is through blood trans­fu­sions, ex­pos­ures in the health care set­tings, or through drug use, or oth­er ex­pos­ures.

This pop­u­la­tion has an in­creased rate of hav­ing hep­at­it­is C, and you re­main in­fec­ted for life. As years go by, the vir­us eats away si­lently at the liv­er and causes late symp­toms. So our big fo­cus is get­ting more people tested and aware of their in­fec­tion status, and, if they’re in­fec­ted, dir­ec­ted to prop­er treat­ment.

Ad­dress­ing health dis­par­it­ies and people with high pre­val­ence, the pre­val­ence is at least two times as high in black Amer­ic­ans as in white. So we want to be care­ful to share the right mes­sage to pro­viders and the com­munity it­self. There’s a simple blood test, and the very ex­cit­ing news is there are safe, short-act­ing cur­at­ive treat­ments for hep­at­it­is C.

If you test and cure them for C, you lower their rate for mor­tal­ity by 50 per­cent and for liv­er can­cer by 70 per­cent, so there’s a huge health pay­off through test­ing and treat­ment.

This wave of treat­ments is very new — only li­censed in Novem­ber or Decem­ber. It al­lows you to have an or­al treat­ment re­gi­men that can be a hand­ful of pills for 12 weeks — maybe 24 — of treat­ment. Be­fore that, and even now, some pa­tients re­quire in­jec­tions of in­ter­fer­on every week with side ef­fects that are quite no­tice­able.

The old treat­ment had a bad repu­ta­tion if you had to live with liv­er dis­eases. To get rid of your in­fec­tion, we have to cor­rect a lot of in­ac­cur­ate im­pres­sions — how they make you feel, what’s in­volved — and we’re at a dif­fer­ent place now.

It comes at an im­port­ant time with rising dis­ease and mor­tal­ity, which is totally pre­vent­able if we can get people tested and treated. We want all people born in that era to be tested for hep­at­it­is, re­ferred for care, and to re­ceive the treat­ments that are in­dic­ated.

In our eco­nom­ic stud­ies, when we look at the cost of avert­ing death and ex­tend­ing lives, we es­tim­ate that it costs about $32,000 to ex­tend a per­son’s life for one year. That’s the tra­di­tion­al way in­ter­ven­tions are eval­u­ated. That fol­lows well in the range of oth­er pre­vent­ive ser­vices for check­ing blood pres­sure, cho­les­ter­ol, and flu vac­cin­a­tions for older adults. It shows it­self to be a very reas­on­able in­ter­ven­tion that has a pay­off in avert­ing death for a reas­on­able amount of money.

We es­tim­ate that if we fully im­ple­ment this birth-co­hort strategy, we can identi­fy 800,000 people not aware they’re in­fec­ted, and avert 120,000 deaths and save $2.5 bil­lion in health care costs.

The obstacles are get­ting clini­cians aware of our re­com­mend­a­tions and help­ing them make it part of their routine prac­tice. The more that can be handled by your nurse or mid-level pro­vider rather than a doc­tor means it can be im­ple­men­ted more quickly. So we’re look­ing to in­sert an elec­tron­ic re­mind­er in­to a pa­tient’s re­cord, like for pa­tients whose birth­days are between 1945 and ‘65, auto­mat­ic­ally you’re offered this test. So we’re look­ing to get that in place.

The U.S. Pre­vent­ive Ser­vices Task Force also made a sim­il­ar re­com­mend­a­tion for test­ing for this group. The be­ne­fit of that is the USP­STF re­com­mend­a­tions are covered as a no-co-pay pre­vent­ive ser­vice. That means, for most private health care ser­vices, the pa­tient won’t have ex­penses, so that re­duces one bar­ri­er. Some­times pro­viders will listen to their pat­ents, and that re­in­forces our mes­sage. They draw blood and add the test on without ad­di­tion­al cost to the pa­tient more of­ten than not since it’s covered by in­sur­ance.

We’re also edu­cat­ing the pub­lic, so the pa­tient knows the im­port­ance, and then we’re gath­er­ing data to see where it’s work­ing and where it’s not and to im­prove it, with par­tic­u­lar at­ten­tion to Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans and com­munit­ies where pre­val­ence is highest.

I’ve had friends in my own com­munity and ac­quaint­ances who un­for­tu­nately have waited too late to be tested and treated, so they’d already de­veloped liv­er dis­ease so ad­vanced they could no longer be­ne­fit from treat­ment. The reas­on is that there are so few symp­toms un­til the ad­vanced stage that a pa­tient can­not rely on how they’re feel­ing. Only through test­ing is that pos­sible. The drugs work bet­ter when the liv­er dis­ease is milder, so the earli­er the test and treat­ment, the bet­ter.

Most pa­tients, when they learn of the reas­ons for test­ing, they read­ily ac­cept it, and I have ex­amples of people say­ing, “Thank you for catch­ing this in time.” In fact, CDC-sup­por­ted test­ing pro­grams get thank-you notes from people who pre­vi­ously didn’t know of their con­di­tion.

So pro­viders and doc­tors will provide a ser­vice that’s ap­pre­ci­ated by pa­tients. Among those people tested and treated and for­tu­nate to clear their in­fec­tion, they say, “I didn’t really know how bad I felt un­til I got rid of this in­fec­tion.” The days of feel­ing slug­gish, out of sorts, los­ing their get-up-and-go, they at­trib­ute to just get­ting older, when it was really hep­at­it­is C that was caus­ing symp­toms. They’re so mild and non­spe­cif­ic no one really seeks med­ic­al care, but ac­tu­ally they have it.

The pro­spect of sav­ing 120,000 lives — well, you don’t get those op­por­tun­it­ies in pub­lic health very of­ten. As­sem­bling at­ten­tion that this de­serves and get­ting pro­viders and the health com­munity on board is mak­ing a dif­fer­ence.

For more in­form­a­tion about the CDC’s Hep­at­it­is C pub­lic edu­ca­tion cam­paign, Know More Hep­at­it­is, please vis­it: ht­tp://­more­hep­at­it­is/



Are you part of the demo­graph­ic that is the Next Amer­ica? Are you a cata­lyst who fosters change for the next gen­er­a­tion? Or do you know someone who is? The Next Amer­ica wel­comes first-per­son per­spect­ives from act­iv­ists, thought lead­ers, and people rep­res­ent­at­ive of a di­verse na­tion. Email us. And please fol­low us on Twit­ter and Face­book.

Jody Brannon contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
McCabe Authorized Criminal Probe Of Sessions One Year Before Firing
1 hours ago

"Nearly a year before Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired senior FBI official Andrew McCabe for what Sessions called a 'lack of candor,'" McCabe launched a federal criminal investigation into whether Sessions withheld information from Congress regarding his contact with Russian operatives. "Democratic lawmakers have repeatedly accused Sessions of misleading them" during his testimony, "and called on federal authorities to investigate." When Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation, "several top Republican and Democratic lawmakers were informed of the probe during a closed-door briefing with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and McCabe."

Senate Passes Bill Combating Sex Trafficking Online
1 hours ago

The Senate passed the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act, or SESTA, by a vote of 97-2. The bill now heads to the White House, where President Trump is expected to sign it into law. SESTA lifts federal immunity for internet platforms involved in sex trafficking, "a move that prosecutors, victims and anti-trafficking activists are heralding as an essential step in cracking down on the crime." Opponents of SESTA argue had argued that lifting the immunity could open websites up to lawsuits based on user-generated content, which could lead to a crackdown on free speech.

How Trade Associations Come Down on the Tariffs
2 hours ago

The Economist

Mark Zuckerberg Responds To Cambridge Analytica Scandal
2 hours ago

In a lengthy Facebook post, Mark Zuckerberg responded to reports that Cambridge Analytica had accessed the personal data of 50 million users, and kept the data after being told by the social media company to delete it. "I started Facebook," wrote Zuckerberg, "and at the end of the day I'm responsible for what happens on our platform ... While this specific issue involving Cambridge Analytica should no longer happen with new apps today, that doesn't change what happened in the past." On Monday, Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, called for “Mr. Zuckerberg and other CEOs” to testify "about social media manipulation in the 2016 election."

White House Backs Omnibus Spending Bill
3 hours ago

"The White House is backing a $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill despite opposition from some House conservatives ... 'The President and the leaders discussed their support for the bill, which includes more funds to rebuild the military, such as the largest pay raise for our troops in a decade, more than 100 miles of new construction for the border wall and other key domestic priorities, like combatting the opioid crisis and rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure,' White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement." The details of the bill are expected to be released later today.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.