Iowa Loss Calls Trump’s On the Ground Operation into Question

Trump offering free food and lodging for volunteers who help in New Hampshire.

Feb. 5, 2016, 8:43 a.m.

After a dis­ap­point­ing second place fin­ish­ing in Iowa for real es­tate mogul Don­ald Trump (R), the strength of his cam­paign’s ground game in New Hamp­shire is be­ing called in­to ques­tion.

Dav­id Car­ney, a GOP strategist and hus­band of former HP CEO Carly Fior­ina’s (R) state dir­ect­or: “They have a lot of vo­lun­teers and they’re proud about that, but vo­lun­teers is not a ground game. … They’re ba­sic­ally just pick­ing up the phone book.”

“Dis­cern­ing the strength of any can­did­ate’s ground game can be dif­fi­cult. Mr. Trump has one key in­gredi­ent: an army of vo­lun­teers drawn to him by his pop­ular­ity and his mes­sage. But pre­ci­sion counts, as Iowa demon­strated. And what Mr. Trump ap­pears to lack is what could provide that pre­ci­sion: a dir­ect-mail pro­gram, a com­pre­hens­ive tar­get­ing ef­fort to identi­fy his sup­port­ers and their in­tens­ity, and a ded­ic­ated poll­ster to help pin­point the voters to whom his tele­vi­sion ads might ap­peal.” (New York Times)

HELP WANTED. Trump’s cam­paign is of­fer­ing some sup­port­ers “de­ploy­ment be­ne­fits” to head up to New Hamp­shire and vo­lun­teer: free food, free lodging, and “po­ten­tial op­por­tun­it­ies to be near Mr. Trump.” (New York Times)

PLAY­ING TO THE CROWD. “There were early signs that the elect­or­ate was ready for an in­sur­gency like the one Mr. Trump has in­spired this elec­tion. And some of the most power­ful of those in­dic­at­ors came from New Hamp­shire.”

Former Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) nar­rowly lost his bid for a New Hamp­shire Sen­ate seat, “1 per­cent to 49, but his cam­paign re­cog­nized something that the na­tion­al party seemed for months to miss: The party’s base was deeply angry, and white work­ing-class voters, like those in New Hamp­shire, felt neg­lected by and ali­en­ated from the polit­ic­al sys­tem.”

“Mr. Trump has emerged as the cham­pi­on of those voters who feel neg­lected, in large part by vis­cer­ally amp­li­fy­ing Mr. Brown’s mes­sage that the bor­ders are not se­cure, Amer­ica is not safe from ter­ror­ism, the eco­nomy is lag­ging and im­mig­rants are poised to do harm to the United States. Mr. Brown, as it hap­pens, en­dorsed Mr. Trump this week.” (New York Times)

REALLY TRY­ING. “Stung by his second-place fin­ish in Iowa, Don­ald Trump is fa­cing new pres­sure to prove he can trans­late his massive crowds and poll leads in­to elec­tion wins. And his team ap­peared in­tent to demon­strate on Thursday that they’d learned from any past mis­takes.”

“Trump’s cam­paign in­creased the day’s planned events for New Hamp­shire from two to five — the most he’d ever ad­vert­ised on the trail. He vis­ited with loc­al busi­ness own­ers, an­swer­ing ques­tions and sign­ing auto­graphs, then offered a pep talk to sev­er­al dozen loc­al po­lice.”

“A hand­ful of re­port­ers were also in­vited in­to his cam­paign headquar­ters to chat with staff and vo­lun­teers as he held a private meet­ing — a move that would have been un­heard of in Iowa, where his team im­posed a strict ‘ra­dio si­lence’ policy and shrouded its op­er­a­tion in secrecy.” (AP)

OVER IT. “The day after ac­cus­ing Ted Cruz of win­ning the Iowa caucuses un­fairly and ask­ing for a re­match in the state, Don­ald Trump says he’s now over it.”

Trump: “I’m so much in­to this, in­to New Hamp­shire, that I just — I don’t care about that any­more. … This is the place I’m fo­cused on now.” (CNN)

THE NEXT DE­BATE. “Don­ald Trump will not com­mit to at­tend­ing the next Fox News Re­pub­lic­an primary de­bate on March 3, a move that threatens to re­ignite the ran­cor between the GOP fron­trun­ner and the cable net­work.”

Trump: “It’s a long ways away. We’ll see.” (CNN)

What We're Following See More »
Mueller Has Interviewed Press Sec. Sarah Sanders
4 hours ago

"Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has interviewed White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, she told CNN on Friday...The interview is one of the final known interviews by Mueller's team. It was conducted late last year, around the same time as the special counsel interviewed then-White House chief of staff John Kelly, well after a number of other senior officials, including former White House communications director Hope Hicks and former press secretary Sean Spicer, were brought in for questioning."

Gov. Newsom Says California Will Sue Trump Over Emergency Declaration
4 hours ago

"Gov. Gavin Newsom said Friday that California was planning to sue the Trump administration over its declaration of a national emergency on the southern border with Mexico, delivering on a promise state Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra made last week 'to reject this foolish proposal in court the moment it touches the ground.'...'No other state is going to be impacted by this declaration of emergency more than the state of California,' the governor said. Becerra said attorneys were reviewing the declaration and would develop the legal argument to take to court in the near future."

Trump Signs Border Deal
4 hours ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Stone Under Gag Order
6 hours ago

"A federal judge on Friday ordered Roger Stone, his attorneys and the special counsel’s office to halt all public commentary about the case involving charges that the longtime Donald Trump associate lied to Congress and obstructed its Russia investigation. In a four-page order, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson sided with Mueller that Stone and his attorneys 'must refrain from making statements to the media or in public settings that pose a substantial likelihood of material prejudice to this case.'"

Supreme Court Will Rule on Census Citizenship Question
8 hours ago

"The Supreme Court added a politically explosive case to its low-profile docket Friday, agreeing to decide by the end of June whether the Trump administration can add a question about citizenship to the 2020 Census form sent to every American household. The census hasn’t asked the question of each household since 1950, and a federal judge last month stopped the Commerce Department from adding it to the upcoming count. He questioned the motives of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, and said the secretary broke a 'veritable smorgasbord' of federal rules by overriding the advice of career officials."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.