The White House unveiled a package of executive actions Thursday designed to limit the potential for abuses of the patent system, but it chose to leverage the attention to again demand action on the issue from the quiet halls of Congress.
In doing so, administration officials also made clear that the ball remains squarely in the Senate’s court, and that the upper chamber must forge its own path on how to best fight “patent trolls,” or companies that buy up cheap patents and use them for profit by filing questionable infringement lawsuits against others.
“This is an area where you can see a sweet spot for bipartisan compromise,” said Gene Sperling, director of the president’s National Economic Council. “We’re not here to negotiate where that sweet spot is, but there is one and people should be able to find it.”
Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker was more blunt: “We need Congress to step up at once,” she said. She praised the House for passing the Innovation Act, an omnibus stab at litigation reform, in December with sweeping bipartisan support before again declaring that “we need the Senate to act as well.”
The three new executive actions announced Thursday all involve improving the workings of the Patent and Trademark Office, the federal body responsible for judging patent filings. Each was met warmly by reform advocates, who deemed them a good-faith strike against the problem of low quality and overly broad patents.
But only so much can be done if Congress doesn’t send a bill to the president’s desk, said Morgan Reed, executive director of the App Association. “It’s in the Senate’s shoebox, so to speak, to move the ball forward [and] get us improved legislation.”
The Senate’s challenge is not one of simple party politics — it’s much more difficult. There are at least three reform provisions that are still causing negotiators ulcers, and stakeholders don’t fall neatly on any one side.
Still, there is cause for hope. Earlier this month, reform crusaders were buoyed by news that Sens. Chuck Schumer and Orrin Hatch were working on a compromise that would bundle two of their pet issues — expansion of a patent quality review program and a requirement that plaintiffs place a bond ensuring they pay up if they lose an infringement case, respectively — together in a package deal.
After publicly discussing the orders Thursday afternoon, the administration convened a roundtable discussion with about 25 key stakeholders. Led by Michelle Lee, the acting head of the patent office, the meeting ran long and had people genuinely mulling over how to reach consensus in the Senate Judiciary Committee, according to those who attended.
“It’s the first time I’ve seen all the sides get in one room and talk,” said attendee Matthew Levy, patent counsel with the Computer and Communication Industry Association. “Everybody showed a real willingness to talk and express their concerns and where they were willing to bend and where they couldn’t.”
“There was a real spirit of trying to communicate and at least work toward a compromise.”
What We're Following See More »
"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."
"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."
Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.