New York Might Be First to Regulate Bitcoin

State regulator still positive on the virtual currency but warns it won’t be allowed to develop in a vacuum.

National Journal
Catherine Hollander
Add to Briefcase
Catherine Hollander
Feb. 21, 2014, midnight

Bit­coin may be emer­ging from a few weeks of neg­at­ive head­lines, but one of the most out­spoken fin­an­cial reg­u­lat­ors says he still sees prom­ise in the vir­tu­al cur­rency.

“I do think it holds a lot of prom­ise (if money laun­der­ing can be ad­equately ad­dressed), both on its own and in terms of caus­ing ex­ist­ing pay­ments sys­tem tech­no­lo­gies to up their game,” Ben­jamin Lawsky, New York’s su­per­in­tend­ent of fin­an­cial ser­vices, wrote Thursday in a two-hour ques­tion-and-an­swer ses­sion on so­cial news site Red­dit.

Lawsky has spoken pub­licly about the fu­ture of bit­coin, a de­cent­ral­ized cur­rency cre­ated in 2008 by a per­son or people un­der the pseud­onym Satoshi Na­kamoto, and its peers be­fore. Earli­er this month, he said there could be a “ker­nel of something here that will have a pro­found im­pact on the fu­ture of pay­ments tech­no­logy and our fin­an­cial sys­tem,” even as he cited re­cent prob­lems with the bit­coin ex­change Mt. Gox and ac­know­ledged reg­u­lat­ors are not the ex­perts, ne­ces­sar­ily, on crypto­cur­rency.

On Thursday, he wrote of his per­son­al evol­u­tion on the sub­ject, cit­ing a not-quite “Rocky-IV-fi­nal-scene about-face,” but say­ing he and his col­leagues had be­come more sup­port­ive as they learned more about crypto­cur­ren­cies.

If Lawsky thinks vir­tu­al cur­rency holds prom­ise, he’s also made it clear that it’s not go­ing to de­vel­op free of reg­u­la­tion, as some bit­coin ad­voc­ates have urged. His state might be the first to de­vel­op bit­coin-spe­cif­ic reg­u­la­tion, and that could be a boon to busi­ness if firms that deal with vir­tu­al cur­rency de­cide to loc­ate where there’s more cer­tainty on the reg­u­lat­ory front. It wouldn’t ne­ces­sar­ily mean that oth­er states would use New York’s frame­work as a tem­plate for their own.

“It’s pos­sible we’ll go first,” Lawsky said in an in­ter­view after his Red­dit ses­sion. He then poin­ted to an an­nounce­ment Thursday morn­ing from the Con­fer­ence of State Bank Su­per­visors that it was form­ing an Emer­ging Pay­ments Task Force — which Lawsky will be part of — to study vir­tu­al cur­ren­cies and oth­er new pay­ment sys­tems as evid­ence his was not the only state pre­par­ing to of­fer guid­ance.

“But, again, it’s not about go­ing first. It’s much more im­port­ant that we get it right,” Lawsky said. His of­fice will draft a frame­work “for the next months,” he said. He de­clined to say when that frame­work would be is­sued.

So far, Lawsky has only offered broad out­lines of po­ten­tial vir­tu­al-cur­rency reg­u­la­tions. Last week, he said New York was con­sid­er­ing a spe­cial “BitLi­cense” for firms, al­though the pre­cise re­quire­ments the li­cense would in­volve are un­known. Asked wheth­er his de­part­ment would reg­u­late bit­coin ATMs, Lawsky wrote Thursday that he didn’t yet know. He has em­phas­ized the need to find the right bal­ance — to set the guard­rails, in reg­u­lat­or­speak — that will al­low in­nov­a­tion but not per­mit money-laun­der­ing or leave con­sumers at risk.

“That’s the mil­lion-dol­lar ques­tion we wrestle with every day,” he said Thursday.

The Red­dit “Ask Me Any­thing” ses­sion was part of Lawsky’s push to write “open-source” reg­u­la­tion. Last month, the New York Fin­an­cial Ser­vices De­part­ment held a pub­lic hear­ing on vir­tu­al cur­rency reg­u­la­tion that drew 14,000 par­ti­cipants on­line, Lawsky said.

The idea for the Red­dit ses­sion came from one of Lawsky’s roughly 1,850 Twit­ter fol­low­ers, Matt An­der­son, deputy su­per­in­tend­ent for pub­lic af­fairs, con­firmed. Lawsky said it was sold as a “pro­duct­ive way to, in one fell swoop, get a lot of ques­tions and a lot of com­ments and a lot of dia­logue.” And it did garner far more ques­tions and com­ments than Lawsky answered in the two-hour peri­od Thursday af­ter­noon. Now comes the in­tern­al rule-writ­ing pro­cess.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Taps Lt. Gen. McMaster as NSC Head
2 minutes ago

"President Donald Trump announced Monday that Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster will serve as his next national security adviser, filling the void left last week by the sudden dismissal of Michael Flynn. ... Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, who had been serving as the acting national security adviser since Flynn's exit, will return to his role as chief of staff of the National Security Council." The pick was widely praised on both sides of the aisle.

Pruitt Confirmed As EPA Head
3 days ago
Harward Turns Down NSC Job
4 days ago

"Ret. Vice Adm. Bob Harward turned down President Donald Trump's offer to be national security adviser Thursday, depriving the administration of a top candidate for a critical foreign policy post days after Trump fired Michael Flynn." Among the potential reasons: his family, his lack of assurances that he could build his own team, and that "the White House seems so chaotic."

House Votes to Let States Block Planned Parenthood Funds
4 days ago

"The House passed a resolution Thursday re-opening the door for states to block Planned Parenthood from receiving some federal funds. The measure, which passed 230-188, would reverse a last-minute rule from the Obama administration that said conservative states can't block the women's health and abortion provider from receiving family planning dollars under the Title X program."

Alexander Acosta to Get Nod for Labor
4 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.