Bitcoin may be emerging from a few weeks of negative headlines, but one of the most outspoken financial regulators says he still sees promise in the virtual currency.
“I do think it holds a lot of promise (if money laundering can be adequately addressed), both on its own and in terms of causing existing payments system technologies to up their game,” Benjamin Lawsky, New York’s superintendent of financial services, wrote Thursday in a two-hour question-and-answer session on social news site Reddit.
Lawsky has spoken publicly about the future of bitcoin, a decentralized currency created in 2008 by a person or people under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, and its peers before. Earlier this month, he said there could be a “kernel of something here that will have a profound impact on the future of payments technology and our financial system,” even as he cited recent problems with the bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox and acknowledged regulators are not the experts, necessarily, on cryptocurrency.
On Thursday, he wrote of his personal evolution on the subject, citing a not-quite “Rocky-IV-final-scene about-face,” but saying he and his colleagues had become more supportive as they learned more about cryptocurrencies.
If Lawsky thinks virtual currency holds promise, he’s also made it clear that it’s not going to develop free of regulation, as some bitcoin advocates have urged. His state might be the first to develop bitcoin-specific regulation, and that could be a boon to business if firms that deal with virtual currency decide to locate where there’s more certainty on the regulatory front. It wouldn’t necessarily mean that other states would use New York’s framework as a template for their own.
“It’s possible we’ll go first,” Lawsky said in an interview after his Reddit session. He then pointed to an announcement Thursday morning from the Conference of State Bank Supervisors that it was forming an Emerging Payments Task Force — which Lawsky will be part of — to study virtual currencies and other new payment systems as evidence his was not the only state preparing to offer guidance.
“But, again, it’s not about going first. It’s much more important that we get it right,” Lawsky said. His office will draft a framework “for the next months,” he said. He declined to say when that framework would be issued.
So far, Lawsky has only offered broad outlines of potential virtual-currency regulations. Last week, he said New York was considering a special “BitLicense” for firms, although the precise requirements the license would involve are unknown. Asked whether his department would regulate bitcoin ATMs, Lawsky wrote Thursday that he didn’t yet know. He has emphasized the need to find the right balance — to set the guardrails, in regulatorspeak — that will allow innovation but not permit money-laundering or leave consumers at risk.
“That’s the million-dollar question we wrestle with every day,” he said Thursday.
The Reddit “Ask Me Anything” session was part of Lawsky’s push to write “open-source” regulation. Last month, the New York Financial Services Department held a public hearing on virtual currency regulation that drew 14,000 participants online, Lawsky said.
The idea for the Reddit session came from one of Lawsky’s roughly 1,850 Twitter followers, Matt Anderson, deputy superintendent for public affairs, confirmed. Lawsky said it was sold as a “productive way to, in one fell swoop, get a lot of questions and a lot of comments and a lot of dialogue.” And it did garner far more questions and comments than Lawsky answered in the two-hour period Thursday afternoon. Now comes the internal rule-writing process.
What We're Following See More »
"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."
President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."