New York Might Be First to Regulate Bitcoin

State regulator still positive on the virtual currency but warns it won’t be allowed to develop in a vacuum.

National Journal
Catherine Hollander
Add to Briefcase
Catherine Hollander
Feb. 21, 2014, midnight

Bit­coin may be emer­ging from a few weeks of neg­at­ive head­lines, but one of the most out­spoken fin­an­cial reg­u­lat­ors says he still sees prom­ise in the vir­tu­al cur­rency.

“I do think it holds a lot of prom­ise (if money laun­der­ing can be ad­equately ad­dressed), both on its own and in terms of caus­ing ex­ist­ing pay­ments sys­tem tech­no­lo­gies to up their game,” Ben­jamin Lawsky, New York’s su­per­in­tend­ent of fin­an­cial ser­vices, wrote Thursday in a two-hour ques­tion-and-an­swer ses­sion on so­cial news site Red­dit.

Lawsky has spoken pub­licly about the fu­ture of bit­coin, a de­cent­ral­ized cur­rency cre­ated in 2008 by a per­son or people un­der the pseud­onym Satoshi Na­kamoto, and its peers be­fore. Earli­er this month, he said there could be a “ker­nel of something here that will have a pro­found im­pact on the fu­ture of pay­ments tech­no­logy and our fin­an­cial sys­tem,” even as he cited re­cent prob­lems with the bit­coin ex­change Mt. Gox and ac­know­ledged reg­u­lat­ors are not the ex­perts, ne­ces­sar­ily, on crypto­cur­rency.

On Thursday, he wrote of his per­son­al evol­u­tion on the sub­ject, cit­ing a not-quite “Rocky-IV-fi­nal-scene about-face,” but say­ing he and his col­leagues had be­come more sup­port­ive as they learned more about crypto­cur­ren­cies.

If Lawsky thinks vir­tu­al cur­rency holds prom­ise, he’s also made it clear that it’s not go­ing to de­vel­op free of reg­u­la­tion, as some bit­coin ad­voc­ates have urged. His state might be the first to de­vel­op bit­coin-spe­cif­ic reg­u­la­tion, and that could be a boon to busi­ness if firms that deal with vir­tu­al cur­rency de­cide to loc­ate where there’s more cer­tainty on the reg­u­lat­ory front. It wouldn’t ne­ces­sar­ily mean that oth­er states would use New York’s frame­work as a tem­plate for their own.

“It’s pos­sible we’ll go first,” Lawsky said in an in­ter­view after his Red­dit ses­sion. He then poin­ted to an an­nounce­ment Thursday morn­ing from the Con­fer­ence of State Bank Su­per­visors that it was form­ing an Emer­ging Pay­ments Task Force — which Lawsky will be part of — to study vir­tu­al cur­ren­cies and oth­er new pay­ment sys­tems as evid­ence his was not the only state pre­par­ing to of­fer guid­ance.

“But, again, it’s not about go­ing first. It’s much more im­port­ant that we get it right,” Lawsky said. His of­fice will draft a frame­work “for the next months,” he said. He de­clined to say when that frame­work would be is­sued.

So far, Lawsky has only offered broad out­lines of po­ten­tial vir­tu­al-cur­rency reg­u­la­tions. Last week, he said New York was con­sid­er­ing a spe­cial “BitLi­cense” for firms, al­though the pre­cise re­quire­ments the li­cense would in­volve are un­known. Asked wheth­er his de­part­ment would reg­u­late bit­coin ATMs, Lawsky wrote Thursday that he didn’t yet know. He has em­phas­ized the need to find the right bal­ance — to set the guard­rails, in reg­u­lat­or­speak — that will al­low in­nov­a­tion but not per­mit money-laun­der­ing or leave con­sumers at risk.

“That’s the mil­lion-dol­lar ques­tion we wrestle with every day,” he said Thursday.

The Red­dit “Ask Me Any­thing” ses­sion was part of Lawsky’s push to write “open-source” reg­u­la­tion. Last month, the New York Fin­an­cial Ser­vices De­part­ment held a pub­lic hear­ing on vir­tu­al cur­rency reg­u­la­tion that drew 14,000 par­ti­cipants on­line, Lawsky said.

The idea for the Red­dit ses­sion came from one of Lawsky’s roughly 1,850 Twit­ter fol­low­ers, Matt An­der­son, deputy su­per­in­tend­ent for pub­lic af­fairs, con­firmed. Lawsky said it was sold as a “pro­duct­ive way to, in one fell swoop, get a lot of ques­tions and a lot of com­ments and a lot of dia­logue.” And it did garner far more ques­tions and com­ments than Lawsky answered in the two-hour peri­od Thursday af­ter­noon. Now comes the in­tern­al rule-writ­ing pro­cess.

What We're Following See More »
IRANIANS CAME WITHIN 1,000 METERS
U.S. Navy Vessel Fired Flare at Iranian Boat on Monday
1 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.

Source:
ON SANCTUARY CITIES
White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
28 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

AT LEAST 30 TO BE ASSESSED
Trump to Order Review of National Monuments
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.

Source:
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login