Lawmakers from Missile States Worry Pentagon Is Studying Closing Silos

Construction takes place in the late 1950s on silos that will eventually house U.S. intercontinental ballistic missiles. A number of lawmakers are concerned the Pentagon has begun the environmental studies necessary for shutting down some of the underground launch complexes for Minuteman 3 missiles.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
Add to Briefcase
Rachel Oswald
Feb. 21, 2014, 9:53 a.m.

A group of law­makers from states that host stra­tegic nuc­le­ar mis­siles are con­cerned the Pentagon could be study­ing clos­ing down some of the weapon silos.

In the last day, mul­tiple let­ters from both cham­bers of Con­gress have been sent to U.S. De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel, de­mand­ing to know wheth­er his de­part­ment is vi­ol­at­ing re­cent fed­er­al law by con­duct­ing en­vir­on­ment­al stud­ies re­lated to the coun­try’s force of un­der­ground-based in­ter­con­tin­ent­al bal­list­ic mis­siles.

“We write to make very clear our strenu­ous op­pos­i­tion to any at­tempt by the De­part­ment of De­fense to cir­cum­vent ex­ist­ing law to pro­ceed with an En­vir­on­ment­al Im­pact Study or an En­vir­on­ment­al As­sess­ment on the elim­in­a­tion of Minute­man 3 silos,” reads one bi­par­tis­an let­ter from Sen­at­ors Jon Test­er (D-Mont.), John Ho­even (R-N.D.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and John Walsh (D-Mont.).

Con­gress in its om­ni­bus fisc­al 2014 spend­ing law has for­bid­den the Pentagon from us­ing ap­pro­pri­ated funds “to con­duct any en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact ana­lys­is re­lated to Minute­man 3 silos that con­tain a mis­sile.”

“If the De­fense De­part­ment is in fact pur­su­ing such a course, we de­mand the leg­al jus­ti­fic­a­tion for how it could so dir­ectly con­tra­dict the let­ter of the law and the re­peatedly stated will of Con­gress,” the four sen­at­ors said.

The Pentagon did not re­turn re­quests for com­ment by press time on wheth­er it was pur­su­ing en­vir­on­ment­al stud­ies of shut­ting down the silos. It is not clear ex­actly what made the law­makers be­lieve the as­sess­ments were tak­ing place, though Cap­it­ol Hill aides on Thursday told the Great Falls Tribune that House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee staff had heard the Air Force was be­gin­ning the stud­ies.

The U.S. Air Force presently de­ploys roughly 450 nuc­le­ar-tipped stra­tegic mis­siles in silos split evenly among three states:  Montana, North Dakota and Wyom­ing. Though the sen­at­ors and rep­res­ent­at­ives from those states are ter­rit­ori­al of the land-based mis­sile mis­sion, a draw-down to no more than 420 of the weapons is in the off­ing; it is only a mat­ter of when.

The New START ac­cord re­quires both the United States and Rus­sia by 2018 to each cap their ar­sen­als of stra­tegic de­liv­ery vehicles — en­com­passing heavy bombers, sub­mar­ine-launched bal­list­ic mis­siles, and silo-based mis­siles — at 700 apiece, with an ad­di­tion­al 100 sys­tems al­lowed in re­serve by each side.

The Pentagon has yet to start im­ple­ment­ing sub­stan­tial re­duc­tions to its stra­tegic de­liv­ery force. However, when they be­gin, they are ex­pec­ted to hap­pen first in the Ohio-class sub­mar­ine fleet, fol­lowed by the elim­in­a­tion of some nuc­le­ar-cap­able air­craft and end­ing with the ground-based mis­siles.

“We strongly be­lieve main­tain­ing our cur­rent ICBM cap­ab­il­ity is vi­tal to pro­mot­ing peace and keep­ing our coun­try and al­lies safe from cur­rent and emer­ging threats,” reads a let­ter sent to the Pentagon on Thursday by Rep­res­ent­at­ives Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Kev­in Cramer (R-N.D.), Cyn­thia Lum­mis (R-Wyo.), Cory Gard­ner (R-Colo.) and Doug Lam­born (R-Colo.). “We are also con­cerned that be­gin­ning an ICBM en­vir­on­ment­al as­sess­ment could sig­ni­fic­antly dam­age the mor­ale of air­men work­ing on this cru­cial mis­sion.”

The en­lis­ted crews and of­ficers charged with op­er­at­ing the Air Force’s Minute­man 3 ar­sen­al in re­cent months have come un­der much pub­lic scru­tiny, amid a move to side­line more than 90 launch con­trol of­ficers who were im­plic­ated in a probe in­to wide­spread-cheat­ing on routine mis­sile-fir­ing cer­ti­fic­a­tion ex­ams. There were also re­cent rev­el­a­tions about an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to drug pos­ses­sion by some of­ficers at Glob­al Strike Com­mand, which over­sees mis­sile and nuc­le­ar bomber op­er­a­tions.

What We're Following See More »
TWO MONTHS AFTER REFUSING AT CONVENTION
Cruz to Back Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST
WHO TO BELIEVE?
Two Polls for Clinton, One for Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

With three days until the first debate, the polls are coming fast and furious. The latest round:

  • An Associated Press/Gfk poll of registered voters found very few voters committed, with Clin­ton lead­ing Trump, 37% to 29%, and Gary John­son at 7%.
  • A Mc­Clatchy-Mar­ist poll gave Clin­ton a six-point edge, 45% to 39%, in a four-way bal­lot test. Johnson pulls 10% support, with Jill Stein at 4%.
  • Rasmussen, which has drawn criticism for continually showing Donald Trump doing much better than he does in other polls, is at it again. A new survey gives Trump a five-point lead, 44%-39%.
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
TRUMP NO HABLA ESPANOL
Trump Makes No Outreach to Spanish Speakers
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "is on the precipice of becoming the only major-party presidential candidate this century not to reach out to millions of American voters whose dominant, first or just preferred language is Spanish. Trump has not only failed to buy any Spanish-language television or radio ads, he so far has avoided even offering a translation of his website into Spanish, breaking with two decades of bipartisan tradition."

Source:
$1.16 MILLION
Clintons Buy the House Next Door in Chappaqua
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Bill and Hillary Clinton have purchased the home next door to their primary residence in tony Chappaqua, New York, for $1.16 million. "By purchasing the new home, the Clinton's now own the entire cul-de-sac at the end of the road in the leafy New York suburb. The purchase makes it easier for the United States Secret Service to protect the former president and possible future commander in chief."

Source:
×