A senior U.N. official this week suggested that Syria’s government is not entirely to blame for delays in an operation to destroy its chemical weapons.
The Middle Eastern nation’s security situation “impacts nearly every dimension” of an operation to remove and eliminate hundreds of tons of warfare chemicals from its violence-plagued territory, according to Angela Kane, U.N. high representative for disarmament affairs.
She spoke shortly before international authorities on Friday reportedly proposed giving President Bashar Assad’s regime until the end of next month to finish shipping out the stocks, a process it was earlier scheduled to complete more than two weeks ago. That proposal and an alternative timeline from Damascus appeared to leave the disarmament mission’s overseers with little hope of meeting their goal of fully destroying the Syrian chemical arsenal by the end of June.
Kane, though, noted that Damascus “completed initial actions before the established deadlines” for the operation, such as eliminating its chemical-arms preparation gear and offering data on its chemical-weapons inventory.
Still, the U.N. official stressed that the Syrian government ultimately remains “exclusively” responsible for making sure its chemical weapons are completely destroyed. Assad’s government admitted holding the stockpile and pledged to give it up last year, after a large-scale nerve gas release killed hundreds of people in a Damascus suburb controlled by its opponents.
The United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons have done “everything possible to facilitate the elimination of Syria’s chemical weapons,” she asserted in remarks prepared for delivery in New York earlier this week.
Kane provided little detail on specific security challenges faced by disarmament personnel. However, she said the obstacles partially mirror dangers faced by international investigators who last year confirmed at least five chemical strikes in the country.
Reaching one location could require those inspectors to negotiate with “up to 40 different groups, moving from checkpoint to checkpoint,” she said.
The U.N. official added that Assad’s government “does not control [significant parts] of its territory, including locations where chemical weapons were allegedly used or where chemical weapons facilities are located.”
Damascus has denied using its chemical arms in combat, and has placed blame for chemical strikes on rebel forces.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.