Why LinkedIn Is Expanding Into China (And Facebook Isn’t)

The social network for professionals is hoping to tap the huge Sino market, and it believes it has less to lose than others by subjecting itself to the “Great Firewall” of censorship.

Buildings are shrouded in smog on November 7, 2013 in Shanghai, China. People were advised to stay indoors today as the Shanghai Environment Agency measured air pollution levels at five out of a possible six. 
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Feb. 24, 2014, 2 p.m.

Linked­In is mak­ing its move on China.

The pro­fes­sion­al net­work­ing site Monday even­ing an­nounced it is launch­ing a test ver­sion of a Chinese-lan­guage site in the coun­try, hop­ing to make gains in a mar­ket that in­cludes more than a half-bil­lion In­ter­net users.

The new site, de­scribed as op­er­at­ing in “sim­pli­fied Chinese,” is a huge step in­to a mar­ket that is con­sidered largely off-lim­its for most of Sil­ic­on Val­ley’s In­ter­net be­hemoths. It sup­ple­ments an Eng­lish ver­sion of Linked­In that has been avail­able in China for more than a dec­ade and cur­rently reaches 4 mil­lion users.

“Our mis­sion is to con­nect the world’s pro­fes­sion­als and cre­ate great­er eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­ity — and this is a sig­ni­fic­ant step to­wards achiev­ing that goal,” Linked­In CEO Jeff Wein­er said in a state­ment an­noun­cing the ex­pan­sion.

The Moun­tain View, Cal­if.-based com­pany, which boasts more than 270 mil­lion users in more than 200 coun­tries, is the only ma­jor U.S. so­cial net­work al­lowed to roam with­in main­land China’s heav­ily po­liced In­ter­net. Sim­il­ar sites, in­clud­ing You­Tube, Face­book, and Twit­ter, are blocked by the coun­try’s gov­ern­ment.

But Linked­In is not free from China’s no­tori­ously ag­gress­ive hu­man cen­sors — some­times re­ferred to as the “Great Fire­wall” — that sift through on­line con­tent to en­sure it doesn’t vi­ol­ate the coun­try’s tight In­ter­net reg­u­la­tions.

By choos­ing to launch a Chinese-lan­guage site, Linked­In is show­ing it is will­ing to op­er­ate in an en­ti­cing mar­ket that has be­deviled oth­er West­ern In­ter­net com­pan­ies for dec­ades. Oth­er tech firms, most not­ably Google, have his­tor­ic­ally spurned China’s cen­sor­ship and sur­veil­lance policies, and China’s gov­ern­ment like­wise has shown little in­terest in court­ing their ser­vices.

But Linked­In is ven­tur­ing where its rivals have re­fused be­cause there is no “dom­in­ant in­cum­bent play­er” — akin to the chal­lenge search gi­ant Baidu poses for Google — to com­pete with, said Blake Harp­er, an ana­lyst with the broker­age firm Wun­der­lich Se­cur­it­ies. In ad­di­tion, the com­pany’s val­ues of eco­nom­ic and busi­ness growth over per­son­al or polit­ic­al ex­pres­sion aligns more closely with the in­terests of China’s rul­ing party.

“Linked­In doesn’t really have to give up a lot to stay true to their core mis­sion,” Harp­er said. “With Twit­ter, [if] you can’t say something, that goes against their en­tire eth­os. With Google, it’s ‘you can’t show cer­tain search res­ults,’ but that’s what Google does.”

In short, users are less likely to use Linked­In to cri­ti­cize the Chinese gov­ern­ment or or­gan­ize polit­ic­al protests, and cen­sor­ship will al­ter the fun­da­ment­al ex­per­i­ence of the net­work less than it would for a site like Face­book.

Still, busi­ness and cen­sor­ship hurdles re­main. And though the com­pany won’t have to go up against a Baidu-style gi­ant, it will be forced to con­tend with sev­er­al rivals, in­clud­ing 51­job[dot]com, Zhaop­in, and Ruolin.

“Even when you do everything right and with due di­li­gence, it is really un­pre­dict­able as to what gov­ern­ment de­mands will come at you,” said Leslie Har­ris, former pres­id­ent of the Cen­ter for Demo­cracy and Tech­no­logy and a board mem­ber of the Glob­al Net­work Ini­ti­at­ive, an In­ter­net-free­dom group. “I don’t think you can as­sume that the dis­cus­sions that oc­cur on the net­work won’t raise con­cerns for the (Chinese) gov­ern­ment.”

Wein­er, Linked­In’s CEO, ad­mit­ted the ex­pan­sion in­to China is one that “raises dif­fi­cult ques­tions, but it is clear to us that the de­cision to pro­ceed is the right one.”

“Linked­In strongly sup­ports free­dom of ex­pres­sion and fun­da­ment­ally dis­agrees with gov­ern­ment cen­sor­ship,” Wein­er ad­ded. “At the same time, we also be­lieve that Linked­In’s ab­sence in China would deny Chinese pro­fes­sion­als a means to con­nect with oth­ers on our glob­al plat­form, thereby lim­it­ing the abil­ity of in­di­vidu­al Chinese cit­izens to pur­sue and real­ize the eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­it­ies, dreams, and rights most im­port­ant to them.”

Wein­er also vaguely pledged that con­tent would only be cen­sored “only when and to the ex­tent re­quired.” Ad­di­tion­ally, the com­pany prom­ised to be trans­par­ent with users about its busi­ness in China and pro­tect their rights and data.

Ru­mors that Linked­In was ready­ing a move in­to the most pop­u­lous coun­try in the world have cir­cu­lated for weeks, as the tech firm last month hired Derek Shen, founder of a Chinese site sim­il­ar to Groupon, to run its Chinese op­er­a­tions. The com­pany also re­cently in­teg­rated with WeChat, a Chinese chat plat­form, which boasts some 300 mil­lion reg­u­lar users.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
16 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
42 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×