Why LinkedIn Is Expanding Into China (And Facebook Isn’t)

The social network for professionals is hoping to tap the huge Sino market, and it believes it has less to lose than others by subjecting itself to the “Great Firewall” of censorship.

Buildings are shrouded in smog on November 7, 2013 in Shanghai, China. People were advised to stay indoors today as the Shanghai Environment Agency measured air pollution levels at five out of a possible six. 
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Feb. 24, 2014, 2 p.m.

Linked­In is mak­ing its move on China.

The pro­fes­sion­al net­work­ing site Monday even­ing an­nounced it is launch­ing a test ver­sion of a Chinese-lan­guage site in the coun­try, hop­ing to make gains in a mar­ket that in­cludes more than a half-bil­lion In­ter­net users.

The new site, de­scribed as op­er­at­ing in “sim­pli­fied Chinese,” is a huge step in­to a mar­ket that is con­sidered largely off-lim­its for most of Sil­ic­on Val­ley’s In­ter­net be­hemoths. It sup­ple­ments an Eng­lish ver­sion of Linked­In that has been avail­able in China for more than a dec­ade and cur­rently reaches 4 mil­lion users.

“Our mis­sion is to con­nect the world’s pro­fes­sion­als and cre­ate great­er eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­ity — and this is a sig­ni­fic­ant step to­wards achiev­ing that goal,” Linked­In CEO Jeff Wein­er said in a state­ment an­noun­cing the ex­pan­sion.

The Moun­tain View, Cal­if.-based com­pany, which boasts more than 270 mil­lion users in more than 200 coun­tries, is the only ma­jor U.S. so­cial net­work al­lowed to roam with­in main­land China’s heav­ily po­liced In­ter­net. Sim­il­ar sites, in­clud­ing You­Tube, Face­book, and Twit­ter, are blocked by the coun­try’s gov­ern­ment.

But Linked­In is not free from China’s no­tori­ously ag­gress­ive hu­man cen­sors — some­times re­ferred to as the “Great Fire­wall” — that sift through on­line con­tent to en­sure it doesn’t vi­ol­ate the coun­try’s tight In­ter­net reg­u­la­tions.

By choos­ing to launch a Chinese-lan­guage site, Linked­In is show­ing it is will­ing to op­er­ate in an en­ti­cing mar­ket that has be­deviled oth­er West­ern In­ter­net com­pan­ies for dec­ades. Oth­er tech firms, most not­ably Google, have his­tor­ic­ally spurned China’s cen­sor­ship and sur­veil­lance policies, and China’s gov­ern­ment like­wise has shown little in­terest in court­ing their ser­vices.

But Linked­In is ven­tur­ing where its rivals have re­fused be­cause there is no “dom­in­ant in­cum­bent play­er” — akin to the chal­lenge search gi­ant Baidu poses for Google — to com­pete with, said Blake Harp­er, an ana­lyst with the broker­age firm Wun­der­lich Se­cur­it­ies. In ad­di­tion, the com­pany’s val­ues of eco­nom­ic and busi­ness growth over per­son­al or polit­ic­al ex­pres­sion aligns more closely with the in­terests of China’s rul­ing party.

“Linked­In doesn’t really have to give up a lot to stay true to their core mis­sion,” Harp­er said. “With Twit­ter, [if] you can’t say something, that goes against their en­tire eth­os. With Google, it’s ‘you can’t show cer­tain search res­ults,’ but that’s what Google does.”

In short, users are less likely to use Linked­In to cri­ti­cize the Chinese gov­ern­ment or or­gan­ize polit­ic­al protests, and cen­sor­ship will al­ter the fun­da­ment­al ex­per­i­ence of the net­work less than it would for a site like Face­book.

Still, busi­ness and cen­sor­ship hurdles re­main. And though the com­pany won’t have to go up against a Baidu-style gi­ant, it will be forced to con­tend with sev­er­al rivals, in­clud­ing 51­job[dot]com, Zhaop­in, and Ruolin.

“Even when you do everything right and with due di­li­gence, it is really un­pre­dict­able as to what gov­ern­ment de­mands will come at you,” said Leslie Har­ris, former pres­id­ent of the Cen­ter for Demo­cracy and Tech­no­logy and a board mem­ber of the Glob­al Net­work Ini­ti­at­ive, an In­ter­net-free­dom group. “I don’t think you can as­sume that the dis­cus­sions that oc­cur on the net­work won’t raise con­cerns for the (Chinese) gov­ern­ment.”

Wein­er, Linked­In’s CEO, ad­mit­ted the ex­pan­sion in­to China is one that “raises dif­fi­cult ques­tions, but it is clear to us that the de­cision to pro­ceed is the right one.”

“Linked­In strongly sup­ports free­dom of ex­pres­sion and fun­da­ment­ally dis­agrees with gov­ern­ment cen­sor­ship,” Wein­er ad­ded. “At the same time, we also be­lieve that Linked­In’s ab­sence in China would deny Chinese pro­fes­sion­als a means to con­nect with oth­ers on our glob­al plat­form, thereby lim­it­ing the abil­ity of in­di­vidu­al Chinese cit­izens to pur­sue and real­ize the eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­it­ies, dreams, and rights most im­port­ant to them.”

Wein­er also vaguely pledged that con­tent would only be cen­sored “only when and to the ex­tent re­quired.” Ad­di­tion­ally, the com­pany prom­ised to be trans­par­ent with users about its busi­ness in China and pro­tect their rights and data.

Ru­mors that Linked­In was ready­ing a move in­to the most pop­u­lous coun­try in the world have cir­cu­lated for weeks, as the tech firm last month hired Derek Shen, founder of a Chinese site sim­il­ar to Groupon, to run its Chinese op­er­a­tions. The com­pany also re­cently in­teg­rated with WeChat, a Chinese chat plat­form, which boasts some 300 mil­lion reg­u­lar users.

What We're Following See More »
FROM THE RIGHT AND THE CENTER
Nine Senate Republicans Vote Against BRCA
4 hours ago
THE LATEST
TURNED OVER NOTES
Manafort Testifies in Closed Session
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Paul Manafort, who served as a top aide to President Trump’s 2016 campaign, on Tuesday provided congressional investigators notes he took during a Trump Tower meeting with a Russian lawyer that has emerged as a focus in the investigation of Russian interference in the election. Manafort’s submission, which came as he was interviewed in a closed session by staff members for the Senate Intelligence Committee, could offer a key contemporaneous account of the June 2016 session."

Source:
PENCE BREAKS THE TIE
Senate Will Debate House Bill
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

By the narrowest of margins, the Senate voted 51-50 this afternoon to begin debate on the House's legislation to repeal and replace Obamacare. Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins defected from the GOP, but Vice President Pence broke a tie. Sen. John McCain returned from brain surgery to cast his vote.

Source:
WON’T SAY IF HE’LL FIRE HIM
Trump “Disappointed” in Sessions
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

“'It’s not like a great loyal thing about the endorsement,'” Mr. Trump said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. 'I’m very disappointed in Jeff Sessions.'”

Source:
MURKOWSKI, COLLINS VOTE NAY
Republicans Reach 50 Votes to Proceed on Health Bill
11 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login