Who Owns Weather, the Feds or the States?

Lawmakers agree on the need to improve disaster relief, but how is more complicated.

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Sophie Novack
Feb. 25, 2014, 3:08 a.m.

Who is ul­ti­mately re­spons­ible for dis­aster re­lief?

For the gov­ernors tasked with hold­ing their states to­geth­er amid nat­ur­al dis­asters, the de­bate over emer­gency re­sponse is not a par­tis­an struggle — it’s about strik­ing the right bal­ance between fed­er­al and loc­al re­spons­ib­il­ity.

“There is no such thing as a Re­pub­lic­an or Demo­crat­ic re­sponse to a dis­aster,” Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn said at a Na­tion­al Journ­al State of the States event Monday. “You have to bring all re­sources to bear at that mo­ment. That’s when people really need the gov­ern­ment.”

Quinn, a Demo­crat, has made dis­aster re­lief and pre­pared­ness a ma­jor part of his work as gov­ernor, and he be­lieves in the im­port­ance of every state in­vest­ing in pre­pared­ness and re­cov­ery to pro­tect against severe weath­er. He signed the Illinois Jobs Now! pro­gram five years ago, which in­cludes ma­jor in­vest­ment in sus­tain­able in­fra­struc­ture for this reas­on.

Quinn, however, is also a strong ad­voc­ate of fed­er­al in­volve­ment in bat­tling nat­ur­al dis­asters. He is push­ing for a change to what he says are un­fair reg­u­la­tions from the Fed­er­al Emer­gency Man­age­ment Agency that de­term­ine wheth­er a par­tic­u­lar area gets fed­er­al aid for dis­aster re­lief. Cur­rently linked to pop­u­la­tion, this reg­u­la­tion dis­ad­vant­ages Illinois, which has the densely pop­u­lated metro area of Chica­go but many emp­ti­er rur­al areas around it, Quinn ar­gues.

Yet while Quinn aims to bal­ance loc­al and fed­er­al in­volve­ment, some ex­perts main­tain that states are too de­pend­ent on fed­er­al aid when it comes to nat­ur­al-dis­aster re­lief.

“There were 95 de­clar­a­tions out of FEMA in 2013, and it was the first time in 16 years when there were less than 100,” says Matt May­er, chief op­er­at­ing of­ficer of the Liberty Found­a­tion of Amer­ica and a mem­ber of the pan­el at Monday’s event. He says the fed­er­al share of dis­aster re­lief has in­creased from 5 per­cent for Hur­ricane Di­ane in 1955 to 50 per­cent for Hur­ricane Kat­rina, to 80 per­cent to Su­per­storm Sandy. “The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment is broke; it doesn’t have a lot of money [for dis­aster re­lief].”

May­er and oth­er pan­el­ists ar­gue that states ought to have more re­spons­ib­il­ity for cov­er­ing smal­ler re­lief ef­forts. Fed­er­al fund­ing could be used to in­centiv­ize states to in­vest in build­ing and pre­pared­ness so that they aren’t re­ly­ing so much on the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment after dis­aster strikes.

“They’re all try­ing put their hands out in­stead [of] up,” May­er says. “This is not a Re­pub­lic­an or Demo­crat­ic is­sue — Re­pub­lic­ans are put­ting out their hands too.”

Find­ing the bal­ance between loc­al and fed­er­al in­volve­ment can be a chal­lenge even for FEMA. “I’m not sure it’s an in­cent­ive is­sue, so much as a co­ordin­a­tion is­sue some­times,” says Timothy Man­ning, deputy ad­min­is­trat­or of the fed­er­al agency. While severe weath­er may re­quire fed­er­al re­lief funds, Man­ning says the vast ma­jor­ity of dis­asters nev­er ex­ceed the ca­pa­city of state gov­ern­ments.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.