Arizona Lawmaker Defends Controversial Religious Freedom Law: ‘The Pillars of Society Are Under Attack’

Sen. Al Melvin also tells CNN’s Anderson Cooper he should considering moving to the Grand Canyon State because “we’re more people-friendly here.”

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Feb. 25, 2014, 3:40 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4758) }}

For any­one dis­mayed that a small band of con­ser­vat­ive politi­cians have yet again hi­jacked Ari­zona’s im­age and cast the state as a place of in­tol­er­ance and bigotry, Monday night didn’t help.

In an in­ter­view with CNN’s An­der­son Cooper, Ari­zona State Sen. Al Melvin, a Re­pub­lic­an, spent more than 10 minutes de­fend­ing the law re­cently passed by both cham­bers of the Le­gis­lature that would make it leg­al for busi­nesses, un­der the aus­pices of “sin­cerely held” re­li­gious free­dom, to dis­crim­in­ate against oth­ers, which most ob­serv­ers see as an at­tack on the LGBT com­munity. The back-and-forth verbal spar­ring between Cooper and Melvin is a baff­ling case study of how to duck dif­fi­cult ques­tions, even for cable-news stand­ards. It fea­tured, among oth­er things, an amus­ing dis­cus­sion of what Je­sus would have dis­crim­in­ated against, wheth­er so­ci­ety judges di­vorce, and to what ex­tent the “me­dia frenzy” is to blame for Ari­zona’s once-again tar­nished repu­ta­tion.

“I’m against all dis­crim­in­a­tion, and I want max­im­um re­li­gious free­dom,” Melvin said sev­er­al times. “I know you’re try­ing to set me up and I’m not go­ing to stand for it.”

At one point, Melvin, who is run­ning for gov­ernor this year, avoided one of Cooper’s sev­er­al ques­tions by ex­plain­ing that Amer­ica was un­der siege by in­si­di­ous forces at­tempt­ing to dis­rupt its cul­tur­al fab­ric.

“All of the pil­lars of so­ci­ety are un­der at­tack in the United States,” Melvin said. “The fam­ily, the tra­di­tion­al fam­ily, tra­di­tion­al mar­riage, main­line churches, the Boy Scouts — you name it.”

When Cooper tried to corner Melvin with a series of lo­gic­al ques­tions about how the law could be ap­plied to just about any­body, in­clud­ing un­wed moth­ers or di­vorced people, Melvin replied, “I don’t know of any­body in Ari­zona who would dis­crim­in­ate against an­oth­er hu­man be­ing.”

A clearly shocked Cooper replied: “Really? I know people in New York who do. No one in Ari­zona dis­crim­in­ates?”Melvin stuck to his guns by of­fer­ing Cooper some life ad­vice. “Maybe you should move to Ari­zona; we’re more people-friendly here.”

The full video is worth a watch.

Gov. Jan Brew­er, a Re­pub­lic­an, has un­til Sat­urday to sign or veto the meas­ure, and she has re­mained mum while in­sist­ing that she is still in full-blown de­lib­er­a­tion mode. As it was with the state’s wildly con­tro­ver­sial im­mig­ra­tion law passed in 2010 that made it a state crime to be an il­leg­al im­mig­rant, no one out­side Brew­er’s tight circle has any con­crete in­dic­a­tion as to how she might vote. She ul­ti­mately did sign that law, but the Su­preme Court struck down key sec­tions of it in 2012.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4757) }}

His­tory, however, sug­gests that Brew­er will ul­ti­mately veto the re­li­gious-free­dom bill, des­pite that pri­or sup­port, which was in large part to se­cure her reelec­tion. Brew­er has fre­quently stood in the way of the state’s exteme con­ser­vat­ives and their agenda, in­clud­ing op­pos­i­tion to Medi­caid ex­pan­sion un­der Obama­care, which she em­braced, or a push to al­low guns on col­lege cam­puses.

As protests con­tin­ue to mount in Ari­zona against the re­li­gious-free­dom le­gis­la­tion, three Re­pub­lic­an state sen­at­ors who voted for it flipped their stances on Monday and said they now be­lieve the meas­ure is ill-con­ceived. Sev­er­al mem­bers of Ari­zona’s con­gres­sion­al del­eg­a­tion, in­clud­ing Sens. John Mc­Cain and Jeff Flake, both Re­pub­lic­ans, have also come out in op­pos­i­tion to the le­gis­la­tion.

What We're Following See More »
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
1 days ago

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
23 hours ago

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
10 hours ago

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.