A leading U.S. lawmaker on defense issues said Washington should formally protest Moscow’s suspected violation of an arms control pact.
“I think that we should hold them accountable” for breaking the terms of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, said Representative Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), the outgoing chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. “They should know they are going to be held accountable.”
The Obama administration has told its NATO allies that it is concerned about a seeming Russian contravention of the bilateral agreement, which prohibits the United States and Russia from developing, testing or possessing any ballistic or cruise missile with ranges between 300 and 3,400 miles. However, the U.S. government to date has refrained from making a formal accusation of a treaty violation.
Washington reportedly is concerned about the Russian military’s trial launches of an unspecified, new ground-fired cruise missile in recent years.
Speaking on the sidelines of a luncheon at the National Press Club, McKeon told Global Security Newswire that the United States should declare Moscow in material breach of the INF accord, regardless of concerns that doing so could prompt the Kremlin to unilaterally withdraw from the treaty.
“Why not? If we’re worried of the ramifications of accusing them of something we feel strongly that they’ve done, then why have a treaty?” he said. “If you have a treaty and you violate it then why would you start to talk about another treaty or expanding a treaty?”
Russia in recent years has hinted it could pull out of the nuclear agreement as a response to evolving intermediate-range missile threats in its region.
At the same time, the Obama administration has made known its desire to initiate bilateral arms-control talks with Russia on a new treaty that would reduce each of the two former Cold War rivals’ arsenals of deployed long-range nuclear weapons to approximately 1,000 warheads.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.