Why Jan Brewer Will Veto Arizona’s Antigay Bill

The Republican governor’s decision is politically calculated and underscores the country’s sizable shift on gay-rights issues. And we’ve seen this from her before.

Dustin Volz
Feb. 25, 2014, 8:29 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4759) }}

Four years ago, it was il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion. Today, it’s gay rights.

She has sur­prised us be­fore, but Ari­zona Gov. Jan Brew­er is likely go­ing to veto the state’s con­tro­ver­sial bill that would let busi­nesses re­fuse ser­vice to gay and les­bi­an cus­tom­ers on re­li­gious grounds, a move that again shows how much na­tion­al polit­ics have moved on so­cial is­sues.

The de­term­in­a­tion, first re­por­ted Tues­day by NBC News, will bol­ster the un­con­ven­tion­al gov­ernor’s im­age as a politi­cian es­cap­ing neat, par­tis­an defin­i­tions. But it also re­af­firms her status as a states­wo­man keenly aware of the polit­ics of the mo­ment, both in her state and around the coun­try.

It seems like a life­time ago, but Ari­zona, un­der Brew­er’s stew­ard­ship, be­came the poster child for the “self-de­port­a­tion” move­ment in 2010, when the Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernor chose to sign a meas­ure that made it a state crime to be in the state il­leg­ally. The move cast Ari­zona as a cru­cible of hate in the eyes of many and cost its state eco­nomy an es­tim­ated $140 mil­lion dol­lars in lost rev­en­ue.

But the de­cision un­ques­tion­ably helped win reelec­tion for Brew­er, who had been in­stalled as gov­ernor just 15 months earli­er after Janet Na­pol­it­ano resigned to head the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment. And des­pite a cres­cendo of protests across the coun­try, oth­er states, in­clud­ing Alabama, Geor­gia, In­di­ana, South Car­o­lina, and Utah, passed sim­il­ar laws in the fol­low­ing year. (The Su­preme Court struck down key sec­tions of Ari­zona’s law in 2012.)

Now, Brew­er is again poised to cap­it­al­ize on the polit­ic­al zeit­geist of the coun­try. In beat­ing down a bill blas­ted by even many fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans as dis­crim­in­at­ory, Brew­er’s de­cision fol­lows a string of court de­cisions, le­gis­lat­ive ef­forts, and ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions that have widened the rights of same-sex couples, who now qual­i­fy for full mar­riage rights in 17 states as well as in the eyes of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment.

Bey­ond the polit­ic­al cal­cu­la­tions, Brew­er, who has un­til Sat­urday to make a de­cision on the bill, has also proved she is not nearly as con­ser­vat­ive as her state Le­gis­lature, or her com­mon ca­ri­ca­tures, would lead us to be­lieve. She has fre­quently con­foun­ded her own party by stand­ing as a bul­wark against her Re­pub­lic­an state House’s agenda, in­clud­ing its op­pos­i­tion to Medi­caid ex­pan­sion un­der Obama­care, which she em­braced, or a push to al­low guns on col­lege cam­puses.

As protests con­tin­ue to mount in Ari­zona against the re­li­gious-free­dom le­gis­la­tion, three Re­pub­lic­an state sen­at­ors who voted for it flipped their po­s­i­tions on Monday and said they now be­lieve the meas­ure is ill-con­ceived. Sev­er­al mem­bers of Ari­zona’s con­gres­sion­al del­eg­a­tion, in­clud­ing Sens. John Mc­Cain and Jeff Flake, both Re­pub­lic­ans, have also come out in op­pos­i­tion to the le­gis­la­tion.

“I just [last night] en­cour­aged her again to veto it,” Flake told Na­tion­al Journ­al on Tues­day. “But I’m not go­ing to speak for her.”

Flake doesn’t have to. As an ac­ci­dent­al Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernor who be­came the face of a charged move­ment against il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion in 2010, as a fierce, fin­ger-wag­ging en­emy to the feds, and as an un­likely cham­pi­on of Medi­caid ex­pan­sion un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act, Brew­er has al­ways spoken for her­self. Es­pe­cially when the cam­er­as are watch­ing.

And she just might chal­lenge the state con­sti­tu­tion and run for an­oth­er term.

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.