The Obama administration isn’t dropping its 2015 defense budget until next week, but one provision in it already appears doomed: a push to relocate or close military bases.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel on Monday outlined the Defense Department’s budget request for the coming fiscal year, asking Congress to approve another round of base realignment and closure in 2017.
But Pentagon officials are already hearing that the request would be “dead on arrival on Capitol Hill,” acting Deputy Defense Secretary Christine Fox said Tuesday at a defense budget conference in Washington.
The last round of BRAC, which occurred in 2005, overshot initial cost projections by approximately $14 billion, and in a time of fiscal austerity members of Congress are wary of trying again.
Fox acknowledged that “nobody looks forward to closing bases or facilities,” and it wouldn’t be the first time members have blocked the Pentagon. Defense officials included a request in its past two budget requests, only to be shot down.
Despite Congress’s reluctance, 91 percent of National Journal‘s Security Insiders said earlier this month that Congress needs to allow the Pentagon to close military bases.
But voting to close bases also has a P.R.-angle for members of Congress — who while largely voting to support the smaller budget numbers — don’t want to be responsible for closing bases, and costing jobs, in their own districts and states.
DOD officials believe they have approximately 25 percent more bases than they need for the force reductions the military is undergoing — both in connection to the budget and separately, Fox said.
The savings the Defense Department hopes to achieve through another BRAC round will be included in the soon-to-be-released budget, Fox noted, but added that it “doesn’t show a lot of the long-term savings that we hope to get.”
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.