The Pentagon’s Push to Close Bases Is ‘Dead on Arrival’

A top Defense official said the department is already hearing that its request is doomed.

National Journal
Jordain Carney
Add to Briefcase
Jordain Carney
Feb. 25, 2014, 9:49 a.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion isn’t drop­ping its 2015 de­fense budget un­til next week, but one pro­vi­sion in it already ap­pears doomed: a push to re­lo­cate or close mil­it­ary bases.

De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel on Monday out­lined the De­fense De­part­ment’s budget re­quest for the com­ing fisc­al year, ask­ing Con­gress to ap­prove an­oth­er round of base re­align­ment and clos­ure in 2017.

But Pentagon of­fi­cials are already hear­ing that the re­quest would be “dead on ar­rival on Cap­it­ol Hill,” act­ing Deputy De­fense Sec­ret­ary Christine Fox said Tues­day at a de­fense budget con­fer­ence in Wash­ing­ton.

The last round of BRAC, which oc­curred in 2005, over­shot ini­tial cost pro­jec­tions by ap­prox­im­ately $14 bil­lion, and in a time of fisc­al aus­ter­ity mem­bers of Con­gress are wary of try­ing again.

Fox ac­know­ledged that “nobody looks for­ward to clos­ing bases or fa­cil­it­ies,” and it wouldn’t be the first time mem­bers have blocked the Pentagon. De­fense of­fi­cials in­cluded a re­quest in its past two budget re­quests, only to be shot down.

Des­pite Con­gress’s re­luct­ance, 91 per­cent of Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Se­cur­ity In­siders said earli­er this month that Con­gress needs to al­low the Pentagon to close mil­it­ary bases.

But vot­ing to close bases also has a P.R.-angle for mem­bers of Con­gress — who while largely vot­ing to sup­port the smal­ler budget num­bers — don’t want to be re­spons­ible for clos­ing bases, and cost­ing jobs, in their own dis­tricts and states.

DOD of­fi­cials be­lieve they have ap­prox­im­ately 25 per­cent more bases than they need for the force re­duc­tions the mil­it­ary is un­der­go­ing — both in con­nec­tion to the budget and sep­ar­ately, Fox said.

The sav­ings the De­fense De­part­ment hopes to achieve through an­oth­er BRAC round will be in­cluded in the soon-to-be-re­leased budget, Fox noted, but ad­ded that it “doesn’t show a lot of the long-term sav­ings that we hope to get.”

What We're Following See More »
PLENTY OF MISTAKES IN COVERT TESTS
Report: U.S. Ill-Equipped to Detect Dirty Bomb
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

A DHS report "found gaping holes in domestic nuclear detection and defense capabilities and massive failures during covert testing." A team put in place to assess our readiness capabilities found significant issues in detecting dangerous radioactive and nuclear materials, failing to do so in 30 percent of covert tests conducted over the course of the year. In far too many cases, the person operating the detection device had no idea how to use it. And when the operator did get a hit, he or she relayed sensitive information over unsecured open radio channels."

Source:
WON’T INTERFERE IN STRUCTURING NSC OFFICE
White House to Give McMaster Carte Blanche
6 hours ago
THE LATEST
RESTROOM ISSUES RETURN
Trump To Rescind Trans Protections
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Donald Trump is planning to reverse an Obama-era order requiring that schools allow students to use the bathroom that coincides with their gender identity. Trump "has green-lighted the plan for the Justice Department and Education Department to send a “Dear Colleague” letter to schools rescinding the guidance." A case is going before the Supreme Court on March 28 in which Gavin Grimm, a transgender high school student, is suing his high school for forbidding him to use the men's room.

Source:
NAIVE, RISK TAKER
Russia Compiling Dossier on Trump’s Mind
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Retired Russian diplomats and members of Vladimir Putin's staff are compiling a dossier "on Donald Trump's psychological makeup" for the Russian leader. "Among its preliminary conclusions is that the new American leader is a risk-taker who can be naïve, according to a senior Kremlin adviser."

Source:
“HORRIBLE” AND “PAINFUL”
Trump Addresses Threats On Jewish Community Centers
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login