House GOP in a Fix Over Fixing Flood Insurance

Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) (R) listens during a news conference on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the U.S. Capitol on March 31, 2011 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Billy House
Add to Briefcase
Billy House
Feb. 26, 2014, 8:20 a.m.

House lead­ers — awash in in­de­cision over how to ad­dress dra­mat­ic hikes to fed­er­al flood-in­sur­ance premi­ums dur­ing a midterm elec­tion year — ab­ruptly post­poned a Thursday vote on a bill be­cause of a lack of sup­port.

Some rank-and-file Re­pub­lic­ans had ex­pressed con­fid­ence as late as Tues­day night that the bill emer­ging in talks with Demo­crats would be ac­ted on this week — only to be told by Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor dur­ing a closed-door ses­sion Wed­nes­day morn­ing that the vote is be­ing put off.

The de­vel­op­ment vividly un­der­scores how fed­er­al flood in­sur­ance — and the need to fix it — blurs the lines between tea-party and con­ser­vat­ive fisc­al polit­ics and the needs and de­mands of con­stitu­ents.

Even some mem­bers of the 40 or so usu­al “hell no” caucus — in­clud­ing many who re­fused to go along with pay­ing for Su­per­storm Sandy dam­age else­where in the coun­try — are plead­ing with Speak­er John Boehner and oth­er GOP lead­ers to take ac­tion to ad­dress the rising premi­ums be­cause of pres­sure from their dis­tricts. Even if that means un­do­ing some re­cently en­acted fisc­al re­forms to bring the pro­gram out of $24 bil­lion in red ink.

What to do was a fo­cus of a meet­ing be­ing held early Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon by the con­ser­vat­ive Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee, a group of 175 House mem­bers.

Adding to the pres­sure, though, is that there have been warn­ings by out­side con­ser­vat­ive groups Her­it­age Ac­tion and Club for Growth that they op­pose the bill that was emer­ging this week in talks with House Demo­crats — and that they would in­clude the vote on their le­gis­lat­ive score­cards.

And some key House chair­men are also said to have more-privately pressed ob­jec­tions to that bill, ar­guing that re­cently en­acted fisc­al re­forms would be gut­ted.

The Club for Growth, in a news re­lease later Wed­nes­day, even singled out Fin­an­cial Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Jeb Hensarling for praise in op­pos­ing the bill, which it said would un­wind and partly re­peal the much-needed re­forms en­acted in 2012.

“House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship wants to stick tax­pay­ers with the bill for high­er sub­sidies to beach­front prop­er­ties, but Con­gress­man Hensarling took a prin­cipled stand,” said Club for Growth Pres­id­ent Chris Chocola.

“As the House Fin­an­cial Ser­vices Com­mit­tee chair­man, Con­gress­man Hensarling has long ad­voc­ated for re­form­ing the flood in­sur­ance pro­gram, so it’s no sur­prise that GOP lead­ers are re­fus­ing to run the bill through his com­mit­tee, and in­stead, are ne­go­ti­at­ing dir­ectly with the Demo­crats,” the state­ment ad­ded. “Re­pub­lic­ans in the House could learn a lot by fol­low­ing Con­gress­man Hensarling’s lead when it comes to pro­tect­ing tax­pay­ers and in­creas­ing eco­nom­ic free­dom.”

There was no im­me­di­ate com­ment from Boehner or Can­tor’s of­fice.

Mean­while, Rep. Bill Cas­sidy, R-La., who is run­ning for a Sen­ate seat and has po­si­tioned him­self as a lead­er in the ef­fort, down­played the delay. He said he re­mains con­fid­ent the bill will soon move for­ward and that “this is an op­por­tun­ity to put good policy be­fore polit­ics.”

“We are di­li­gently work­ing on im­prove­ments to the bill that the Sen­ate al­tern­at­ive le­gis­la­tion failed to ad­dress. We have care­fully built a co­ali­tion and draf­ted a sol­id pro­pos­al that has garnered wide­spread sup­port. Now, small changes are be­ing made to en­sure pas­sage of the bill and to en­sure FEMA im­ple­ments it cor­rectly,” Cas­sidy said.

At is­sue are pro­vi­sions of a 2012 bill co­sponsored by Rep. Max­ine Wa­ters — the rank­ing Demo­crat on the Fin­an­cial Ser­vices Com­mit­tee — and former Rep. Judy Big­gert, R-Ill. The meas­ure, passed against the back­drop of a long-term budget­ary crisis, ad­jus­ted the rate maps of the Na­tion­al Flood In­sur­ance Pro­gram and made oth­er changes de­signed to fix the pro­gram that is tens of bil­lions of dol­lars in debt (now $24 bil­lion).

But what’s en­sued are huge spikes in some flood-in­sur­ance premi­ums in coastal states like Louisi­ana, Flor­ida, and Con­necti­c­ut, and what some loc­al gov­ern­ments say has been a para­lys­is in their real-es­tate mar­kets.

The Sen­ate has already passed a bill that would out­right delay the Big­gert-Wa­ters Act’s ad­just­ments to rate maps for four years.

But many House con­ser­vat­ives say that goes too far.

At the same time, House Re­pub­lic­ans have found dif­fi­culty find­ing the right blend of tweaks to the 2012 law to deal with the fast-rising premi­ums, while also main­tain­ing the force and spir­it of its re­forms to the ail­ing flood in­sur­ance pro­gram have been dif­fi­cult.

The com­plaints about the bill that was sched­uled to be voted on Thursday in­cluded that it would un­der­mine the cur­rent law’s goal of end­ing tax­pay­er sub­sidies for the roughly one-fifth of the na­tion­al poli­cy­hold­ers who re­ceive them and would ex­tend in­to per­petu­ity sub­sidies for roughly 700,000 older primary homes, even if they are resold by the cur­rent own­er.

The meas­ure also would roll back rate in­creases for prop­er­ties that have been resold since Big­gerts-Wa­ters law was passed in mid-2012.

“This bill rep­res­ents a fun­da­ment­al be­tray­al of the free-mar­ket prin­ciples and fisc­al re­spons­ib­il­ity the House lead­er­ship claims to em­brace,” said R.J. Lehmann, a seni­or fel­low at R Street In­sti­tute, which char­ac­ter­izes it­self as a “free mar­ket” or “liber­tari­an” think tank.

What We're Following See More »
Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
2 days ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Trump Draws Laughs, Boos at Al Smith Dinner
3 days ago

After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."

McMullin Leads in New Utah Poll
3 days ago

Evan McMul­lin came out on top in a Emer­son Col­lege poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clin­ton took third with 24%. Gary John­son re­ceived 5% of the vote in the sur­vey.

Quinnipiac Has Clinton Up by 7
3 days ago

A new Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity poll finds Hillary Clin­ton lead­ing Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” van­ished from the uni­versity’s early Oc­to­ber poll. A new PPRI/Brook­ings sur­vey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a vir­tu­al dead heat, with Trump tak­ing 41% of the vote to Clin­ton’s 40% in a four-way match­up.

Trump: I’ll Accept the Results “If I Win”
3 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.