What Jan Brewer’s Gay Bill Veto Means for Arizona — and the Country

By choosing to veto, Brewer has helped restore part of the state’s reputation and delivered a loud warning shot to social conservatives.

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Feb. 26, 2014, 2:49 p.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4767) }}

Ari­zona Gov. Jan Brew­er on Wed­nes­day night ve­toed her state’s con­tro­ver­sial bill that would let busi­nesses re­fuse ser­vice to gay and les­bi­an cus­tom­ers on re­li­gious grounds be­cause it “does not ad­dress a spe­cif­ic or press­ing con­cern re­lated to re­li­gious liberty.”

“Re­li­gious liberty is a core Amer­ic­an and Ari­zona value. So is nondis­crim­in­a­tion,” Brew­er said dur­ing a press con­fer­ence at the state Cap­it­ol. “After weigh­ing all of the ar­gu­ments, I have ve­toed Sen­ate Bill 1062 mo­ments ago.”

The Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernor had little choice but to turn back a two-page bill that had drawn in­tense na­tion­al scru­tiny since its pas­sage by the state Le­gis­lature last week. In ad­di­tion to mass protests in the state, sev­er­al or­gan­iz­a­tions and busi­nesses had strongly urged Brew­er to hand down a veto. The Na­tion­al Foot­ball League was re­portedly con­sid­er­ing mov­ing next year’s Su­per Bowl from the state if Brew­er signed the bill in­to law.

In ad­di­tion, both of Ari­zona’s sen­at­ors, Re­pub­lic­ans John Mc­Cain and Jeff Flake, had pressed Brew­er to kill the bill. Mitt Rom­ney pushed for a veto, and three Re­pub­lic­an state sen­at­ors who ori­gin­ally voted for the meas­ure suc­cumbed to polit­ic­al pres­sure and re­versed their po­s­i­tions.

Close ob­serv­ers of Ari­zona polit­ics will find the veto un­sur­pris­ing, and yet it’s an­oth­er ex­ample of Brew­er’s meth­od­ic­al polit­ic­al cal­cu­lus that has defined her ten­ure as gov­ernor, an of­fice she as­sumed after Janet Na­pol­it­ano resigned in 2009 to lead the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment.

The veto will help sal­vage some of Ari­zona’s tar­nished repu­ta­tion, which has been un­deni­ably battered in re­cent years, be­gin­ning with Brew­er’s de­cision in 2010 to sign a “self-de­port­a­tion” law against il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion that drew wide­spread con­dem­na­tion but also helped her se­cure reelec­tion that year. Key sec­tions of that law were struck down by the Su­preme Court in 2012, and cost Ari­zona an es­tim­ated $140 mil­lion in lost rev­en­ue due to boy­cotts.

Ari­zona’s na­tion­al im­age con­tin­ued to de­teri­or­ate, however. In 2011, a gun­man opened fire at a con­stitu­ent event in Tuc­son for then-Rep. Gab­ri­elle Gif­fords, killing six and wound­ing 13, in­clud­ing Gif­fords. The vi­ol­ence garnered in­tense na­tion­al at­ten­tion and promp­ted Pima County Sher­iff Clar­ence Dupnik to de­clare that “Ari­zona is the mecca for pre­ju­dice and bigotry.”

But today, Ari­zona is not go­ing to be de­rided as a place of pre­ju­dice or bigotry. By choos­ing not to sign, Brew­er has gone from a gov­ernor who helped se­cure her state’s repu­ta­tion­al de­mise in 2010, when rhet­or­ic against il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion reached its apex, to a gov­ernor who pre­ven­ted an­oth­er wave of eco­nom­ic boy­cotts and en­dur­ing scru­tiny, a move un­der­scor­ing just how much polit­ics on so­cial is­sues — es­pe­cially gay rights — have changed around the coun­try.

“I call them like I see them,” Brew­er said. “Des­pite the cheers or boos from the crowd.” 

As an ac­ci­dent­al Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernor who be­came the face of a charged move­ment against il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion in 2010, as a fierce, fin­ger-wag­ging en­emy to the feds, and as an un­likely cham­pi­on of Medi­caid ex­pan­sion un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act, Brew­er has al­ways done ex­actly that. Es­pe­cially when the cam­er­as are watch­ing.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4768) }}

What We're Following See More »
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×