Vets Bill Goes Down as Military Sexual-Assault Bills Come Up

Angry over process, Republicans withhold votes needed to get vets bill to the floor.

U.S. Bernard Sanders (I-VT) covers his face during a 2009 hearing. Sanders is considering introducing a bill that would end liability limits for the nuclear power industry in the event of a disaster.
National Journal
Feb. 27, 2014, 7:37 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans scuttled a $21 bil­lion vet­er­ans’ pack­age in the Sen­ate on Thursday, but have agreed to al­low com­pet­ing mil­it­ary sexu­al-as­sault bills to move to the floor for votes.

The vet­er­ans’ bill from Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Ver­mont in­de­pend­ent, went down on a pro­ced­ur­al vote 56-41 be­cause Re­pub­lic­ans, denied the abil­ity to of­fer amend­ments, with­held the votes needed to get it to the floor.

Mean­while, long-stalled votes on com­pet­ing mil­it­ary sexu­al-as­sault le­gis­la­tion offered by Demo­crat­ic Sens. Kirsten Gil­librand of New York and Claire Mc­Caskill of Mis­souri are fi­nally ex­pec­ted to ad­vance.

After Re­pub­lic­ans ob­jec­ted to mov­ing for­ward with the bills earli­er in the week, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id and Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell struck a deal late Wed­nes­day to ex­ped­ite de­bate and al­low the meas­ures to pro­ceed as early as next week.

The Gil­librand bill would re­form the mil­it­ary justice sys­tem by strip­ping com­mand­ers of the power to de­cide which sexu­al-as­sault cases are pro­sec­uted. Gil­librand has 55 votes lined up for her bill and could man­age to pass it if she can find 60 votes needed to get the le­gis­la­tion to the floor.

Mc­Caskill’s bill in­cludes a host of non­con­tro­ver­sial re­forms, in­clud­ing dis­al­low­ing a sol­dier’s good mil­it­ary char­ac­ter to be con­sidered in the de­fense of a sexu­al as­sault and meas­ures to make it easi­er for vic­tims to chal­lenge un­fair dis­charges from the ser­vice.

The Sanders bill ex­pands vet­er­ans’ be­ne­fits in edu­ca­tion and health care, and it would re­verse a cost-of-liv­ing ad­just­ment on mil­it­ary re­tir­ees’ pen­sions that was in­cluded in last year’s budget deal. Vet­er­ans’ groups strongly sup­port the le­gis­la­tion, and some cried foul at the closed pro­cess for com­plic­at­ing its chances.

Re­pub­lic­ans op­posed the bill’s off­set, which re­lied on sav­ings from the draw­down of the wars in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan and wanted to of­fer al­tern­at­ives. But among their wish list was a vote on Ir­an sanc­tions, which Re­id said was not rel­ev­ant to the bill and would not be al­lowed.

“The Amer­ic­an Le­gion would very much like to have seen Re­id open up the bill to amend­ments, to help the bill get through the pro­cess,” said Louis Celli, a le­gis­lat­ive dir­ect­or with the group. “We would op­pose non-ger­mane amend­ments like Ir­an, but this par­tis­an­ship and games­man­ship has got to stop so that Amer­ic­an people can get the laws back that we need to help vet­er­ans.”

What We're Following See More »
FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T BLOCK SUBPOENA OF BANK RECORDS
Trump Loses in Court Again
1 days ago
THE LATEST
SAYS HE CAN'T DO IT WHILE INVESTIGATIONS CONTINUE
Trump Pulls the Plug on Infrastructure
1 days ago
THE LATEST
ADMINISTRATION IS 0-FOR-1 ON STONEWALLING THIS WEEK
Parties Go to Court Today Over Trump Banking Records
1 days ago
THE LATEST
ARRIVAL UNDER "EXTREME SECRECY"
Tillerson Talking to House Foreign Affairs
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was spotted entering a congressional office building on Tuesday morning for what a committee aide told The Daily Beast was a meeting with the leaders of the House Foreign Affairs committee and relevant staff about his time working in the Trump administration. ... Tillerson’s arrival at the Capitol was handled with extreme secrecy. No media advisories or press releases were sent out announcing his appearance. And he took a little noticed route into the building in order to avoid being seen by members of the media."

Source:
DEMAND DOCUMENTS AND TESTIMONY
House Subpoenas Hope Hicks, Annie Donaldson
2 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login