The top official at the National Security Agency suggested that the scope of its controversial phone-data collection program could be limited to keep only information related to terrorism.
“I think there’s yet another option where you look at what data you actually need and get only that data,” NSA Director Keith Alexander said, testifying at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing Thursday.
That option, he added, assumes the U.S. can “come up with a capability that just gets those that are predicated on a terrorist communication.”
Alexander’s comments are a stark contrast to the NSA’s bulk collection of phone metadata that privacy advocates, and some members of Congress, have criticized. As a former senior intelligence official told The Washington Post last year, the NSA wanted to collect “the whole haystack” rather than “a single needle in the haystack.”
Alexander said a proposal will be submitted to Congress “over the next several weeks.” Each of the options under consideration to modify the program has its pros and cons, he said, adding that officials are focused on how the program’s “agility” would be effected.
A panel commissioned by the White House suggested last year that phone companies or a private third party should hold the metadata, but the industry has shown little interest or support for that proposal. The Obama administration is currently weighing four options on what to do with the program.
Alexander, who will retire this spring, and the NSA have been under near constant criticism since June, when media outlets began to publicly disclose U.S. intelligence-gathering programs, largely using documents provided by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.
Alexander stressed throughout the hearing that the American people need to have a better understanding of what the NSA does, and that a “reset” is needed.
What We're Following See More »
"It was obvious he wasn't prepared." “He only mentioned her email scandal once." "I think he took things a little too personal and missed a lot of opportunities to make very good debate points." That's just a smattering of the reactions of some elected Republicans to Donald Trump's debate performance.
The conventional wisdom is already emerging that Donald Trump opened last night's debate well, but that he faded badly down the stretch. And most viewers apparently witnessed it. "The early Nielsen data confirms that viewership stayed high the entire time. Contrary to some speculation, there was not a big drop-off after the first hour of the 98-minute debate." Final data is still being tallied, but "Monday's face-off may well have been the most-watched debate in American history. CNN and other cable news channels saw big increases over past election years. So did some of the broadcast networks."
As Congress continues to bicker on riders to a continuing resolution, federal agencies have started working with the Office of Management and Budget to prepare for a government shutdown, which will occur if no continuing resolution is passed by 11:59 p.m. on Friday night. The OMB held a call with agencies on Sept. 23, one that is required one week before a possible shutdown. The government last shut down for 16 days in 2013, and multiple shutdowns have been narrowly avoided since then. It is expected that Congress will reach a deal before the clock strikes midnight, but until it does, preparations will continue.