A decades-old political scandal and grainy FBI footage are usually the stuff of Hollywood movies, not TV ads for Senate candidates. But a candidate from South Dakota is turning to the glitz and glamor of Tinseltown and his own brush with a dark chapter in U.S. political history to argue voters should send him back to Washington.
Larry Pressler, a former three-term Republican senator who has launched something of a quixotic independent bid for South Dakota’s open Senate seat, will run a new TV this Sunday that highlights his role in the Abscam scandal, an FBI sting operation that led to the conviction of a handful of Capitol Hill lawmakers back in the early 1980s. Pressler not only turned down the bribe, but was filmed by a secret FBI camera doing so.
The scandal later became the plot for the Academy Award-nominated movie American Hustle. And because the Oscars are this Sunday, Pressler’s saw a unique opportunity to highlight his ethical pedigree.
“American Hustle shows the FBI making real-life bribes to Washington politicians,” Pressler says in his ad. “I know, because as your U.S. senator, I turned them down.”
The spot then shows the FBI’s black-and-white footage, which appears to be taken from hidden camera, of Pressler telling disguised agents that “it would not be proper” to accept a campaign contribution.
“This is the type of honest leadership I would bring to Washington, D.C.,” the independent candidate says.
The ad, according to Pressler, will run in South Dakota during the Academy Awards. It was not immediately clear how large the ad buy is.
Pressler surprised many this year when he unexpectedly declared he would run as an independent candidate for the state’s open Senate seat. His bid is considered a long shot: Republicans have largely coalesced behind former Gov. Mike Rounds, and the state’s conservative bent will make it difficult for any other candidate to claim victory.
Still, Pressler held the office for 18 years. And now he has a critically acclaimed movie helping him make the case that he deserves another six.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."