As a meteorology student at a Pennsylvania college, Matthew Stepp didn’t aspire to be a TV weatherman but he loved the research on the forces of nature. “I was always a science nerd,” he said.
He went on to earn a master’s degree in science, technology, and public policy at the Rochester Institute of Technology, and just five years after graduation, Stepp, 29, has become the leader of Washington’s newest think tank, the Center for Clean Energy Innovation.
Housed at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, the center is unique among research organizations in the capital. “We’re the only one directly focused on energy-innovation policy,” Stepp said.
The goal is to address climate change by advocating for government policies that encourage development of low-carbon technologies. In doing so, the center will be “technology-neutral,” Stepp said, meaning it will look for ways to generally promote innovation in the energy world.
“We want to see the same kind of technology development for clean energy as we saw with fracking,” he said, referring to the advancements in drilling techniques that led to the current U.S. oil and gas boom.
Among the subjects the center will address are American research and development programs, tax policy, trade issues, science and math education, and advanced manufacturing. It plans to put out its first report in late March or early April offering policymakers an agenda for action on clean-energy development, Stepp said.
Stepp, a Philadelphia native, finished his master’s in 2009 and landed a fellowship at the National Academy of Sciences assisting the Transportation Research Board. He later moved to the Breakthrough Institute, where he worked on green-energy issues, before moving to the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation in 2010 as an energy policy analyst.
What We're Following See More »
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."
"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."
"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.
The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."