Why Putin Isn’t Worried About Sanctions

The Russian president won’t feel their effect — but ordinary Russian citizens will.

Matryoshka dolls in the likeness of then-Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and President Obama stand on display at a souvenir stall St. Petersburg in 2010.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Marina Koren
March 3, 2014, 9:19 a.m.

When ten­sions es­cal­ated in East­ern Europe last week, Pres­id­ent Obama warned Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin that mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion in Ukraine would lead to “costs.”

Now that a Rus­si­an par­lia­ment-ap­proved in­cur­sion in­to Crimea, a sov­er­eign ter­rit­ory of Ukraine, is well un­der­way, the United States and oth­er world powers are de­term­in­ing ex­actly what those costs are.

Sev­en of the Group of Eight lead­ing in­dus­tri­al na­tions, in­clud­ing the U.S., have sus­pen­ded pre­par­a­tions for an or­gan­iz­a­tion sum­mit in So­chi in June “un­til the en­vir­on­ment comes back where the G-8 is able to have mean­ing­ful dis­cus­sion.” Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry, who is trav­el­ing to Kiev on Tues­day, said eco­nom­ic sanc­tions and travel re­stric­tions for in­di­vidu­al Rus­si­an of­fi­cials are on the table. Some mem­bers of Con­gress are push­ing for the pres­id­ent to im­pose trade sanc­tions, while oth­ers are call­ing for Rus­sia’s im­me­di­ate ex­pul­sion from the G-8.

Brit­ish Prime Min­is­ter Dav­id Camer­on is draw­ing up his own set of sanc­tions against Rus­sia, and Switzer­land, Liecht­en­stein, and Aus­tria have frozen the as­sets of ous­ted Ukrain­i­an Pres­id­ent Vikt­or Ya­nukovych and 19 of his of­fi­cials on or­ders from the new Ukrain­i­an gov­ern­ment.

Such polit­ic­al rep­rim­ands are all well and good for na­tions that want to avoid any mil­it­ary con­front­a­tion with Rus­sia. But they won’t quell Rus­si­an ag­gres­sion in Ukraine.

World lead­ers are boy­cot­ting dip­lo­mat­ic dis­cus­sions and threat­en­ing sanc­tions? Big deal, says the Krem­lin.

This week­end, Ger­man Chan­cel­lor An­gela Merkel told Obama that Putin soun­ded out of touch with real­ity when she spoke with him on the phone. The Rus­si­an pres­id­ent, she said, was “in an­oth­er world.”

That’s be­cause he is. Right now, Putin has tun­nel vis­ion, and it’s aimed right at Crimea. At the south­w­est tip of the pen­in­sula lies Sevastopol, the warm-wa­ter port that nev­er freezes over. Sevastopol houses a cru­cial nav­al base, leased by Rus­sia from Ukraine, of the Black Sea fleet.

The base sig­nals the end of Rus­sia’s mil­it­ary route in­to the Medi­ter­ranean, which makes it a power­ful stra­tegic as­set for the coun­try. Putin won’t give it up without a fight, and sanc­tions won’t change that. Pre­serving Rus­si­an in­terests reigns su­preme. An in­ter­ven­tion in Ukraine is un­doubtedly risky, but so is los­ing the base, and by ex­ten­sion Mo­scow’s power­ful glob­al stand­ing. For Putin, the fal­lout from los­ing the base far out­weighs the ef­fects of sanc­tions and polit­ic­al snub­bing.

The Rus­si­an pres­id­ent is bet­ting that any sanc­tions would be re­l­at­ively short-lived. Push­ing Putin too far could be dan­ger­ous. Many European na­tions haven’t for­got­ten about their deep eco­nom­ic ties to Rus­sia, in­clud­ing their de­pend­ence on its crude oil and nat­ur­al-gas ex­ports. For West­ern Europe, im­ple­ment­ing ser­i­ous eco­nom­ic sanc­tions would be un­wise, as Rus­sia could re­tali­ate by cut­ting off the gas pipelines that run through Ukraine to Europe. And U.S. sanc­tions would barely make a dent in the Rus­si­an eco­nomy: Rus­sia ac­counts for less than 2 per­cent of Amer­ic­an trade.

So far, West­ern Europe is sidestep­ping sanc­tions. The European Uni­on and the gov­ern­ments of Ger­many and France have pushed for me­di­ation between Mo­scow and Kiev, not sanc­tions. The or­gan­iz­a­tion’s emer­gency meet­ing on Monday is “ex­pec­ted to res­ult in a strongly worded state­ment of con­dem­na­tion, but no im­me­di­ate pun­it­ive meas­ures,” ac­cord­ing to the EurAct­ive Net­work, which re­ports E.U. policy news. Any ac­tion by the United Na­tions is un­likely, thanks to Rus­sia’s veto power as a per­man­ent mem­ber of the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil.

The in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity can fire off as many warn­ings as it likes for now. The chances of Putin listen­ing are slim. “Rus­sia was, is, and will be an em­pire with an etern­al ap­pet­ite for ex­pan­sion. And it will gath­er whatever spuri­ous reas­ons it needs to in­su­late it­self ter­rit­ori­ally from what it still per­ceives to be a large and grow­ing NATO threat,” writes Ju­lia Ioffe at The New Re­pub­lic. “Try­ing to har­ness Rus­sia with our own lo­gic just makes us miss Putin’s next steps.”

But if world powers are ser­i­ous about im­pos­ing sanc­tions against Rus­sia, the time ap­pears to be now. Rus­sia’s eco­nomy has taken a hit since the stan­doff in East­ern Europe began in earn­est a few weeks ago. On Monday, the Rus­si­an stock mar­ket fell by 13 per­cent, and the ruble dropped to a his­tor­ic low against the dol­lar. Rus­sia only re­cently over­came double-di­git in­fla­tion, Quartz re­ports, and the plum­met­ing value of the ruble could push in­fla­tion back up.

Ul­ti­mately, eco­nom­ic sanc­tions likely won’t stop Putin from push­ing to se­cure Crimea for Rus­si­an in­terests. Nor will sym­bol­ic pen­al­ties and White House phone calls al­ter the course in East­ern Europe. But the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity’s pun­ish­ments will be felt most acutely by or­din­ary Rus­si­ans, many of whom don’t want to go to war.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.