Confessions of a Former RT Employee

A freelancer explains why he went to work for the Kremlin-funded network.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Lucia Graves
March 5, 2014, midnight

Meet Sam Knight, the Wash­ing­ton-based journ­al­ist and acerbic tweeter who, be­fore he turned to freel­an­cing, spent a sum­mer work­ing for the Eng­lish-lan­guage out­let for RT. The net­work, formerly known as Rus­sia Today, has been the toast of the me­dia this week as events in Ukraine con­tin­ue to un­fold.

First it was lam­pooned for go­ing soft on Putin, as when it called Rus­sia a “sta­bil­iz­ing force in Ukraine.” Later its D.C.-based host, Abby Mar­tin, was praised for de­noun­cing Rus­sia’s in­va­sion of Ukraine on air and pro­claim­ing her ed­it­or­i­al in­de­pend­ence from the net­work (later still, and this is not totally re­lated, it was re­vealed that she’s an avid 9/11 truth­er!).

As someone who worked for RT, Knight couldn’t read with a straight face RT’s state­ment about let­ting its journ­al­ists freely ex­press them­selves. In a con­ver­sa­tion with Na­tion­al Journ­al, he dis­cussed his per­son­al ex­per­i­ences with the net­work.

So what was it like?

I re­mem­ber be­ing told that cer­tain top­ics were out of bounds. Rus­sia wasn’t mak­ing head­lines in the sum­mer of 2012 (when I was there) like it is today. But when we wanted to cov­er China, for ex­ample, we were warned against crit­ic­al cov­er­age of for­eign coun­tries — an af­front to journ­al­ism for do­mest­ic con­sump­tion, if you think about it, when Beijing sup­press­ing in­de­pend­ent labor uni­ons and gut­ting en­vir­on­ment­al reg­u­la­tions has a dir­ect ef­fect on Amer­ic­an work­ers. Yet there was a lot of cov­er­age of the Que­bec stu­dent protests and anti-aus­ter­ity protests in Spain and Greece and such. And they were im­port­ant stor­ies and well worth cov­er­ing, to be fair, but the im­pli­cit mes­sage was clear: For­eign af­fairs from an Amer­ic­an per­spect­ive were ac­cept­able as long as they wer­en’t of­fens­ive to Mo­scow.

So why did you work for them?

I knew what show I was work­ing for: Alyona Minkovski is hon­est and was a great boss and host. She had a great team, and when the Huff­ing­ton Post snapped her up I felt vin­dic­ated. All of the stor­ies we did about tar­get­ing killing, sur­veil­lance, the Trans Pa­cific Part­ner­ship, the crack­down on the Oc­cupy move­ment, the pris­on in­dus­tri­al com­plex, etc. were all well ahead of the curve, if you look at some of the head­lines today. I did feel a little weird work­ing for a net­work with ties to the Krem­lin, sure, but the journ­al­ism job mar­ket is tough these days — par­tic­u­larly if you’re an Amer­ic­an seek­ing to cov­er your own gov­ern­ment in a non-su­per­fi­cial man­ner.

Would you warn people away from work­ing there?

There’s go­ing to con­tin­ue to be a steady sup­ply of people ready to both work for and watch RT. The cor­por­ate me­dia is staffed with fleshy bags of walk­ing sy­co­phancy — pathet­ic ex­cuses for journ­al­ists, really — and a lot of these stor­ies about RT reek of pro­jec­tion and in­sec­ur­ity. These “Neo-nazis in Kiev are over­stated,” or “Putin is just do­ing this be­cause he can” stor­ies are child­ish and ab­surd, boil­ing the en­tire con­flict down to black and white “demo­cracy vs. au­thor­it­ari­an­ism” or a car­toon­ish pan­to­mime por­trait of a guy, who, in real­ity, has sup­port that can’t be eas­ily dis­missed — both at home and in Crimea. This doesn’t ex­cuse RT’s cov­er­age of the con­flict. But it’s state-owned. What are these jin­go­ist­ic Amer­ic­an hacks’ ex­cuses?

What We're Following See More »
DECLINES TO HEAR APPEAL
SCOTUS Leaves Political Ad Disclosure Law In Place
1 hours ago
BREAKING

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal to the "federal disclosure rules for political advertising," leaving in place the ruling by a lower court upholding a law requiring the disclosure of donors to political ads. The appeal came from "a Denver-based libertarian think tank that wanted to run an ad without being forced to divulge its major donors," which argued that the requirement was a violation of first amendment rights under the Court's Citizens United decision.

Source:
ENLISTS THEIR HELP IN REPEAL/REPLACE
Trump Meets with Health Execs
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
WOULD CUT NON-DEFENSE BY SAME AMOUNT
Trump Budget Would Bump Defense Spending by $54 Billion
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration is proposing a budget it says will increase defense spending by $54 billion and cut non-defense spending by the same amount. The White House is sending a topline budget proposal reflecting those figures to federal agencies on Monday afternoon, according to an Office of Management and Budget official." An unnamed OMB official said most federal agencies would face cutbacks.

Source:
WILL THE DINNER HAPPEN?
Trump To Skip Correspondents Dinner
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Donald Trump announced in a tweet on Saturday that he would not attend the White House Correspondents' Association dinner in April. The move did not come as a surprise, another moment in his ongoing battle with the media, which he has dubbed the "enemy" of the American people and repeatedly refers to as "fake news." Multiple outlets have already cancelled their events surrounding the dinner and several are considering skipping the event outright.

FOLLOWS ARMY SECRETARY
Navy Secretary Nominee To Withdraw
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Phillip Bilden, Donald Trump's nominee for Navy secretary, has decided to withdraw his nomination after he was unable to sufficiently untangle his financial commitments. Bilden follows Vincent Viola, who withdrew his nomination for Army secretary.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login