Democrats Put Hillary Clinton at Risk by Dismissing Benghazi Criticism

New poll finds the attack still hurts Clinton, and her allies are doing her no favors by pretending it’s a nonissue.

Hillary Clinton arrives to speak on September 12, 2012 on the killing of US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and 3 staff members at the US Consulate building in Benghazi, Libya, from the Treaty Room of the US Department of State, in Washington, DC.
National Journal
March 5, 2014, midnight

Demo­crats have ad­op­ted a dis­missive, al­most be­mused pos­ture when it comes to the con­ser­vat­ive fix­a­tion with the 2012 at­tack on the dip­lo­mat­ic out­post in Benghazi, Libya, con­fid­ent in the know­ledge that the facts bear little re­semb­lance to what they see as the Right’s con­spir­acy the­or­ies.

On one hand, they’re cor­rect. Count­less con­gres­sion­al com­mit­tee re­ports, ad­min­is­tra­tion probes, and journ­al­ist­ic in­vest­ig­a­tions have cleared then-Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton of any wrong­do­ing, and found there was little else the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion could have done once the at­tacks began. “Ghazi” has be­come short­hand for a par­tis­an-driv­en scan­dal.

But Demo­crats are in deni­al if they think Benghazi won’t be an is­sue in the 2016 pres­id­en­tial race, should Clin­ton run.

A new poll from Pew Re­search Cen­ter and USA Today shows the danger. When re­spond­ents were asked to name in their own words the biggest neg­at­ive for Clin­ton from her long ca­reer in pub­lic ser­vice, the most com­mon re­sponse was Benghazi. Sure, it’s only 15 per­cent who gave that an­swer, but that’s still a lot.

And it’s not just Re­pub­lic­ans; Demo­crats also picked it more of­ten than any­thing else, with 8 per­cent list­ing the at­tack as Clin­ton’s biggest neg­at­ive.

Just be­cause Demo­crats be­lieve there was noth­ing ne­far­i­ous about Clin­ton’s role in Benghazi doesn’t mean there are no grounds from which to cri­ti­cize her. Be­sides, they should have learned from “a gov­ern­ment takeover of health care” and “you didn’t build that” that bump­er-stick­er slo­gans can still de­liv­er blows. That’s polit­ics.

Re­spond­ents to the Pew sur­vey wer­en’t giv­en a list of op­tions to choose from, but had to vo­lun­teer their own an­swers — al­most 20 per­cent couldn’t come up with any neg­at­ive at all — and it’s not a good thing for Clin­ton that a plur­al­ity of voters had Benghazi on the top of their minds.

Bill Clin­ton and his dal­li­ances were the next most fre­quent an­swer, at 9 per­cent. The rest of the re­sponses — her party af­fil­i­ation, “gen­er­al dis­like,” “dis­hon­estly,” and “ca­reer politi­cian” — were offered by 2 per­cent or 3 per­cent of re­spond­ents each.

And you can bet that Re­pub­lic­ans will put Benghazi front and cen­ter if Clin­ton runs, says Tim Miller, the ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Amer­ica Rising, a Re­pub­lic­an su­per PAC ded­ic­ated to op­pos­i­tion re­search. While he ac­know­ledges that there’s been some “silly-sea­son” claims on Benghazi from his own side, “there is a cent­ral ar­gu­ment about com­pet­ence and pre­pared­ness that’s worth dis­cuss­ing.”

His group is work­ing on an “au­thor­it­at­ive tick­tock” of the at­tack based on ex­ist­ing sources, which he says will be used to raise dif­fi­cult ques­tions about Clin­ton and the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s hand­ling of events sur­round­ing the at­tack, from dip­lo­mat­ic se­cur­ity be­fore­hand to how the White House re­spon­ded af­ter­ward.

Clin­ton’s ten­ure at the State De­part­ment is one of her biggest as­sets, as the Pew poll clearly shows. But just 12 per­cent vo­lun­teered it as the most pos­it­ive as­pect of her ca­reer, slightly few­er than those who cited Benghazi as the most neg­at­ive.

It would be polit­ic­al mal­prac­tice for Re­pub­lic­ans to leave her ten­ure at State un­ques­tioned, and Benghazi rep­res­ents the clearest way for them to go after Clin­ton’s biggest strength. “The over­throw of [Muam­mar] Qad­dafi is seen as one of her sig­na­ture ac­com­plish­ments,” Miller notes of the former Liby­an dic­tat­or.

Benghazi un­der­mines one of Clin­ton’s key mes­sages, says Katie Pack­er Gage, who was Mitt Rom­ney’s deputy cam­paign man­ager in 2012 and re­cently star­ted a con­sult­ing firm aimed at help­ing Re­pub­lic­ans per­form bet­ter with fe­male voters. “When she ran last time, she made the case that she was the one who could take that 3:00 a.m. phone call. Well, that 3:00 a.m. phone call came for her, from Benghazi, and I’m not sure that was a par­tic­u­larly strong mo­ment for her as sec­ret­ary of State,” Gage says.

Demo­crats point out that the at­tack didn’t seem to cause Pres­id­ent Obama much harm dur­ing the 2012 elec­tion, even though it was much fresh­er in people’s minds then. And they ar­gue that the Re­pub­lic­an ob­ses­sion with the at­tack could back­fire when they over­reach, as House Over­sight Com­mit­tee Chair­man Dar­rell Issa has while try­ing to tie Clin­ton to Benghazi.

Be­sides, it’s only 15 per­cent of re­spond­ents, they say. “Un­like many in the GOP who re­main ob­sessed with point­ing fin­gers, Sec­ret­ary Clin­ton im­me­di­ately put policies in­to place to en­sure this tragedy nev­er oc­curs again,” says Ad­rienne El­rod, the com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or of Cor­rect the Re­cord, a Demo­crat­ic su­per PAC. “This poll shows that the GOP’s re­lent­less at­tempts to politi­cize a tragedy aren’t work­ing and that a ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans don’t buy it.”

But in a tight race, 15 per­cent might be something Clin­ton needs to ser­i­ously worry about. It might be­hoove her al­lies to stop laugh­ing at it.

What We're Following See More »
FOR IMPROPER SPENDING, INFLUENCE
Trump Inauguration Spending Now Under Investigation
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal prosecutors in Manhattan are investigating whether President Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee misspent some of the record $107 million it raised from donations, people familiar with the matter said. The criminal probe by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, which is in its early stages, also is examining whether some of the committee’s top donors gave money in exchange for access to the incoming Trump administration, policy concessions or to influence official administration positions."

Source:
WOULD HAVE CROSSED NATIONAL FORESTS
Federal Judges Nix Proposed Atlantic Pipeline
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a rare rebuke to energy companies in the Trump era, "a panel of federal judges has rejected permits for the Atlantic Coast natural gas pipeline to cross two national forests and the Appalachian trail in Virginia, finding that the national Forest Service 'abdicated its responsibility' and kowtowed to private industry in approving the project. The harshly worded, 60-page decision issued Thursday by three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is part of a string of legal setbacks for the 600-mile pipeline. The $7 billion project, being built by a consortium of companies led by Dominion Energy, is planned to carry natural gas from West Virginia, through Virginia and into North Carolina."

Source:
PINS KHASHOGGI KILLING ON MBS
Senate Moves to End Support for Saudi War
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
REP. POLIQUIN HAD CHALLENGED THE LAW
Federal Judge Upholds Ranked-Choice Voting in Maine
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A federal judge on Thursday rejected Republican U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin’s constitutional claims against ranked-choice voting and denied the incumbent’s request for a new election against Democratic Congressman-elect Jared Golden. U.S. District Court Judge Lance Walker ruled that, contrary to the arguments of Poliquin’s legal team, the U.S. Constitution does not require that whichever congressional candidates receives the most votes—or 'a plurality'—be declared the winner. Instead, Walker ruled the Constitution grants states broad discretion to run elections."

Source:
SAUDI ARABIA, ISRAEL, AND THE UAE
Mueller Probing Middle East Countries' Influence Campaigns
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Officials working under Special Counsel Robert Mueller are investigating Middle Eastern countries' attempts to influence American politics, and are set to release the findings in early 2019. "Various witnesses affiliated with the Trump campaign have been questioned about their conversations with deeply connected individuals from the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Israel ... Topics in those meetings ranged from the use of social-media manipulation to help install Trump in the White House to the overthrow of the regime in Iran." Investigators are also probing meetings organized by Lebanese-American businessman George Nader, and Joel Zamel, "a self-styled Mark Zuckerberg of the national-security world with deep ties to Israeli intelligence."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login