Obamacare Mandate Delay Projected to Leave Additional 1 Million Uninsured

The delay, proposed in the latest House Republican counter to the health care law, would save the government $9.5 billion over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office projects.

Rocky rollout: HealthCare.gov.
Add to Briefcase
Clara Ritger
March 5, 2014, 8:07 a.m.

Roughly 1 mil­lion more people would forgo health in­sur­ance this year if Obama­care’s in­di­vidu­al-man­date pen­alty were delayed, ac­cord­ing to pro­jec­tions from the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice.

House Re­pub­lic­ans last week un­veiled a pro­pos­al to shift back by one year the im­ple­ment­a­tion of the tax pen­al­ties for con­sumers who choose not to com­ply with the Af­ford­able Care Act’s re­quire­ment to pur­chase health in­sur­ance. The House is sched­uled to vote on the pro­pos­al Wed­nes­day, and Re­pub­lic­ans have the votes they need to pass it.

Ac­cord­ing to CBO’s new cost-be­ne­fit ana­lys­is of the le­gis­la­tion, delay­ing the in­di­vidu­al-man­date pen­alty would save the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment some $9.5 bil­lion over the next dec­ade, due to lower en­roll­ment in Medi­caid and de­creased spend­ing on health in­sur­ance tax cred­its made avail­able to con­sumers who pur­chase cov­er­age on the law’s ex­changes.

Of the 1 mil­lion ex­pec­ted to forgo cov­er­age, CBO es­tim­ates that half would have en­rolled in Medi­caid or CHIP — the Chil­dren’s Health In­sur­ance Pro­gram for low-in­come youth — and half would have been covered by em­ploy­ers or ob­tained in­sur­ance in the ex­changes.

The meas­ure has vir­tu­ally no chance of be­com­ing law, however, as it is likely won’t go any­where in the Demo­crat­ic­ally con­trolled Sen­ate, and it would face a near-cer­tain veto from Pres­id­ent Obama.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.