For Darrell Issa and Elijah Cummings, Sorry Is the Hardest Word

Both congressmen are asking for an apology after an explosive disagreement at a Wednesday morning hearing. But it may be too late to apologize.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa gets up to leave as ranking member U.S. Rep. Elijah Cummings continues to speak after Issa adjourned the hearing in the Rayburn House Office Building March 5, 2014 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sarah Mimms
March 5, 2014, 12:04 p.m.

House Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Re­form Com­mit­tee Chair­man Dar­rell Issa and rank­ing mem­ber Eli­jah Cum­mings don’t ex­actly get along well, as was ap­par­ent dur­ing a Wed­nes­day morn­ing hear­ing: Cum­mings began a lengthy speech de­noun­cing the chair’s in­vest­ig­at­ive tac­tics while Issa held down the mute but­ton on Cum­mings’s mi­cro­phone.

Both are call­ing for an apo­logy fol­low­ing the out­burst, and Issa, in true House Over­sight Com­mit­tee form, is call­ing on his Demo­crat­ic col­leagues to launch a kind of in­vest­ig­a­tion.

“He owes me an apo­logy,” Issa said Wed­nes­day af­ter­noon. “I think he should be dealt with by his lead­er­ship. You know the con­duct of the House…. We’d dis­missed the only wit­ness and his con­duct was in­ap­pro­pri­ate and rather shock­ing.”

The in­cid­ent began fol­low­ing a very brief Over­sight hear­ing with former IRS of­fi­cial Lois Lern­er, which ended ab­ruptly after Lern­er in­voked her Fifth Amend­ment right. Issa of­fi­cially ad­journed the hear­ing, but not be­fore Cum­mings took to the mic.

“Mr. Chair­man you can­not run a com­mit­tee like this “¦ we are bet­ter than that as a coun­try, we are bet­ter than that as a com­mit­tee, I have asked for a few minutes to ask — ” Cum­mings said be­fore Issa cut his mi­cro­phone.

“We’re ad­journed, close it down,” Issa said, as Cum­mings began shout­ing in­to the dead mi­cro­phone. After a minute, Issa just got up and left. (Watch the video of the full ex­change here.)

Issa isn’t sure ex­actly where Cum­mings’s at­tack came from. “We talked about it be­fore the hear­ing. He asked would there be open­ing state­ments? I said no, there wouldn’t be, we’d already opened in May. And he un­der­stood that,” Issa ex­plained later Wed­nes­day. “And then he asked if he could ask a ques­tion after ad­journ­ment. I said, ‘What is your ques­tion?’ and he went in­to ef­fect­ively an open­ing state­ment ac­cus­ing me of hav­ing all the hear­ings based on false premise. And so then — we’d already ad­journed, I simply walked away.”

For his part, Cum­mings says Issa should be the one to say he’s sorry. He and the oth­er 16 Demo­crat­ic mem­bers of the Over­sight Com­mit­tee penned a let­ter to Issa Wed­nes­day, ask­ing for an apo­logy. “We be­lieve your ac­tions today were dis­respect­ful and ab­us­ive, and they im­pugn the in­teg­rity of this Com­mit­tee and un­der­mine the cred­ib­il­ity of its work. They also make it ap­pear that the Com­mit­tee is more con­cerned with polit­ic­al spec­tacle than gath­er­ing facts in a bal­anced and im­par­tial man­ner,” they wrote.

For now, Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship seems to be stick­ing by their man. “The be­ha­vi­or dis­played today by Chair­man Issa dur­ing the Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment re­form hear­ing was un­ac­cept­able and de­plor­able,” Minor­ity Whip Steny Hoy­er said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al. “This is not how our demo­cracy works and it’s not the way to provide re­spons­ible gov­ern­ment over­sight. Rank­ing Mem­ber Cum­mings and Demo­crats should have the op­por­tun­ity to be heard. If any­one de­serves an apo­logy, Mr. Cum­mings does.”

Hoy­er also tweeted his sup­port for the rank­ing mem­ber Wed­nes­day morn­ing.

Up­dated: Wed­nes­day at 5:50 p.m. with com­ments from Hoy­er.

What We're Following See More »
TROUBLE LOOMING?
Durbin Says Government Shutdown Possible
2 minutes ago
THE LATEST
AT LEAST 19 TODAY
Jewish Community Keeps Receiving Threats
9 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
DECLINES TO HEAR APPEAL
SCOTUS Leaves Political Ad Disclosure Law In Place
3 hours ago
BREAKING

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal to the "federal disclosure rules for political advertising," leaving in place the ruling by a lower court upholding a law requiring the disclosure of donors to political ads. The appeal came from "a Denver-based libertarian think tank that wanted to run an ad without being forced to divulge its major donors," which argued that the requirement was a violation of first amendment rights under the Court's Citizens United decision.

Source:
ENLISTS THEIR HELP IN REPEAL/REPLACE
Trump Meets with Health Execs
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
WOULD CUT NON-DEFENSE BY SAME AMOUNT
Trump Budget Would Bump Defense Spending by $54 Billion
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration is proposing a budget it says will increase defense spending by $54 billion and cut non-defense spending by the same amount. The White House is sending a topline budget proposal reflecting those figures to federal agencies on Monday afternoon, according to an Office of Management and Budget official." An unnamed OMB official said most federal agencies would face cutbacks.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login