House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa and ranking member Elijah Cummings don’t exactly get along well, as was apparent during a Wednesday morning hearing: Cummings began a lengthy speech denouncing the chair’s investigative tactics while Issa held down the mute button on Cummings’s microphone.
Both are calling for an apology following the outburst, and Issa, in true House Oversight Committee form, is calling on his Democratic colleagues to launch a kind of investigation.
“He owes me an apology,” Issa said Wednesday afternoon. “I think he should be dealt with by his leadership. You know the conduct of the House…. We’d dismissed the only witness and his conduct was inappropriate and rather shocking.”
The incident began following a very brief Oversight hearing with former IRS official Lois Lerner, which ended abruptly after Lerner invoked her Fifth Amendment right. Issa officially adjourned the hearing, but not before Cummings took to the mic.
“Mr. Chairman you cannot run a committee like this “¦ we are better than that as a country, we are better than that as a committee, I have asked for a few minutes to ask — ” Cummings said before Issa cut his microphone.
“We’re adjourned, close it down,” Issa said, as Cummings began shouting into the dead microphone. After a minute, Issa just got up and left. (Watch the video of the full exchange here.)
Issa isn’t sure exactly where Cummings’s attack came from. “We talked about it before the hearing. He asked would there be opening statements? I said no, there wouldn’t be, we’d already opened in May. And he understood that,” Issa explained later Wednesday. “And then he asked if he could ask a question after adjournment. I said, ‘What is your question?’ and he went into effectively an opening statement accusing me of having all the hearings based on false premise. And so then — we’d already adjourned, I simply walked away.”
For his part, Cummings says Issa should be the one to say he’s sorry. He and the other 16 Democratic members of the Oversight Committee penned a letter to Issa Wednesday, asking for an apology. “We believe your actions today were disrespectful and abusive, and they impugn the integrity of this Committee and undermine the credibility of its work. They also make it appear that the Committee is more concerned with political spectacle than gathering facts in a balanced and impartial manner,” they wrote.
For now, Democratic leadership seems to be sticking by their man. “The behavior displayed today by Chairman Issa during the Oversight and Government reform hearing was unacceptable and deplorable,” Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said in a statement to National Journal. “This is not how our democracy works and it’s not the way to provide responsible government oversight. Ranking Member Cummings and Democrats should have the opportunity to be heard. If anyone deserves an apology, Mr. Cummings does.”
Hoyer also tweeted his support for the ranking member Wednesday morning.
Updated: Wednesday at 5:50 p.m. with comments from Hoyer.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."