What Can Venture Capitalists Do for Recently Released Prisoners?

New York state is about to find out.

National Journal
Elahe Izad
Add to Briefcase
Elahe Izad
March 6, 2014, 1:41 a.m.

On Fri­days, people re­cently re­leased from pris­on head to Cen­ter for Em­ploy­ment Op­por­tun­it­ies in New York City for an ori­ent­a­tion ses­sion. It’s the start of a year-long re­la­tion­ship in which they work on a trans­ition­al work crew, learn how to search for a job with a crim­in­al con­vic­tion, and fig­ure out how to hold down steady em­ploy­ment.

“People who are at the highest risk are closest to re­lease [from pris­on]. If you can get over that hump, we think that’s keep­ing people from re-of­fend­ing,” says Marta Nel­son, Ex­ec­ut­ive Dir­ect­or of CEO New York City.

While the pro­gram may seem like any oth­er re­cidiv­ism-pre­ven­tion ini­ti­at­ive, what makes it a one-of-a-kind is how it’s fun­ded: by private, high-net-worth in­vestors.

In Decem­ber 2013, Gov. An­drew Cuomo an­nounced the start of New York’s Pay for Suc­cess pro­gram, the first state-led so­cial-im­pact bond. Private in­vestors put up $13.5 mil­lion to ex­pand a so­cial pro­gram with a proven track re­cord, and they ex­pect a re­turn on their in­vest­ment if the pro­gram meets spe­cif­ic per­form­ance stand­ards. The state ends up sav­ing money it would have oth­er­wise spent on in­car­cer­at­ing people, and in­vestors can even earn a profit.

“The bot­tom line is it does not mat­ter where you work — a For­tune 500 com­pany, in the gov­ern­ment, or a non­profit — we’re all tax­pay­ers and we all have to pay to in­car­cer­ate people,” says Al­phonso Dav­id, Cuomo’s deputy sec­ret­ary for civil rights.

The pro­gram fo­cuses on people at a high risk of end­ing up back in pris­on; CEO has re­duced re­cidiv­ism among its par­ti­cipants up to 22 per­cent, ac­cord­ing to a study by MDRC, a non­par­tis­an so­cial-policy re­search or­gan­iz­a­tion. The Pay for Suc­cess in­vest­ment al­lows CEO to serve an ad­di­tion­al 500 people every year.

“It pays non­profit pro­viders or ser­vice pro­viders like us what it ac­tu­ally costs to do what we do, and al­lows us to go out and do it without be­ing con­cerned with how to raise money, day to day or week to week,” says Nel­son.

It costs a lot of money to put and keep people in pris­on. New York spends an av­er­age of $60,000 per in­mate and $3.6 bil­lion a year on pris­ons. Ideally, pub­lic money would be go­ing in­to pre­vent­ing re­cidiv­ism, which is 40 per­cent in New York state. But of­ten that’s not the case.

“There is a grow­ing body of evid­ence on a lot of these top­ics about ef­fect­ive in­ter­ven­tions, but those in­ter­ven­tions are too costly, too risky, too big, or the re­turned be­ne­fits are too far in­to the fu­ture for gov­ern­ment to be will­ing to fund it it­self,” says John Ro­man, seni­or fel­low at the Urb­an In­sti­tute.

In New York, private in­vestors put up money, which gets paid up-front to CEO at reg­u­lar in­ter­vals. These sorts of fin­an­cing struc­tures are pop­u­lar in the United King­dom, and are start­ing to catch on in the U.S. The Labor De­part­ment awar­ded $12 mil­lion to New York to start it.

Bank of Amer­ica and Mer­rill Lynch se­cured money from more than 40 in­vestors, who put in an av­er­age of $300,000 each, in­clud­ing former Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Larry Sum­mers and the Sorensen Found­a­tion.

“They all say what ex­cited them is this is a vehicle that will al­low them to in­vest in people’s lives ac­tu­ally im­prov­ing, and that’s a source of re­turn,” says Tracy Pa­landji­an, CEO of So­cial Fin­ance, which brought all the parties to­geth­er in the com­plex ar­range­ment.

CEO must re­duce re­cidiv­ism by at least 8 per­cent or in­crease em­ploy­ment by at least 5 per­cent for in­vestors to get their money back. But they can get more if the pro­gram ex­ceeds those mark­ers. The max­im­um pay­out to in­vestors is around $21.5 mil­lion, some of which comes from the Labor De­part­ment grant and some from the state. New York would still stand to save $7.8 mil­lion. The first re­pay­ment will be in four years.

“The source of the re­turn is not a tra­di­tion­al zero-sum trans­ac­tion in the sense that the in­vestors profit comes at the profit of someone’s loss,” Pa­landji­an says. “It’s about cre­at­ing value to­geth­er, so even after the gov­ern­ment re­pays in­vestors, they’re still net.”

One of the best meth­ods to re­duce re­cidiv­ism is to fo­cus on people at a high risk for end­ing up back in pris­on, and cre­at­ing highly spe­cial­ized coun­sel­ing for their in­di­vidu­al needs, says Thomas MacLel­lan, the Na­tion­al Gov­ernors As­so­ci­ation dir­ect­or of home­land se­cur­ity and pub­lic safety. For some, that’s em­ploy­ment. For oth­ers, there could be phys­ic­al and men­tal-health chal­lenges first.

Un­der­ly­ing any kind of anti-re­cidiv­ism pro­gram is the need for good, sol­id data, MacLel­lan adds. Pro­ponents of so­cial-im­pact bonds ar­gue that the private sec­tor forces ef­fi­ciency and over­sight in the way that gov­ern­ment doesn’t. But it’s still on states to fig­ure out what mat­ters most to them when it comes to pub­lic safety policy.

“Com­pound­ing this whole thing is the value. For some states, it’s lock­ing them up and throw­ing away the key,” says MacLel­lan. “Cor­rect­ive sys­tems are re­flec­tions of value, and not re­search and sci­ence.”

What We're Following See More »
CAN’T WITHHOLD FUNDING
Trump’s Sanctuary Cities Order Blocked
11 hours ago
BREAKING
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
WHITE HOUSE BLOCKING DOC REQUEST
Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
12 hours ago
BREAKING

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Source:
SENATE JUDICIARY HEARING
Sally Yates to Testify on May 8
17 hours ago
THE LATEST
MESSAGE TO PUTIN
U.S. To Conduct Exercises In Estonia
17 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The U.S. deployed "F-35 joint strike fighters" to Estonia on Tuesday. The "jets will stay in Estonia for several weeks and will be a part of training flights with U.S. and other NATO air forces." The move comes at a time of high tension between the U.S. and Estonia's neighbor, Russia. The two nations have been at odds over a number of issues recently, most of all being Vladimir Putin's support of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in light of Assad's chemical weapons attack on his own people in the midst of a civil war.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login