My Big Fat Republican Family

Can the GOP come together on growing apart? At CPAC, Paul Ryan offers a new frame on GOP infighting.

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Brian Resnick
March 6, 2014, 9:22 a.m.

We read it all the time: The Re­pub­lic­an Party is in the midst of a civil war. It’s tea-party con­ser­vat­ives against es­tab­lish­ment Re­pub­lic­ans. It’s the ideo­logy of Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, and Mike Lee (liber­tari­an, isol­a­tion­ist, and dog­mat­ic) against the party of John Mc­Cain, Lind­sey Gra­ham, and Mitch Mc­Con­nell (prag­mat­ic, mil­it­ary hawks). The con­ven­tion­al wis­dom is that these ideo­lo­gic­al fis­sures will keep the party from gain­ing the mo­mentum it needs for polit­ic­al takeover in the com­ing elec­tions.

But can this pre­vail­ing head­line on the GOP be spun in­to a pos­it­ive?

At the Con­ser­vat­ive Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Con­fer­ence Thursday, Rep. Paul Ry­an tried a new frame for GOP fric­tion: Di­versity of ideas is a good thing.

“The way the Left tells it, the Re­pub­lic­an Party is in a civil war,” the Wis­con­sin Re­pub­lic­an said. “It’s tea party versus es­tab­lish­ment — liber­tari­ans versus so­cial con­ser­vat­ives. There’s in­fight­ing, con­flict, back­bit­ing, dis­cord. Look, I’m Ir­ish — that’s my idea of a fam­ily re­union. I don’t see this great di­vide in our party. What I see is a vi­brant de­bate.”

The mes­sage: Let’s re­place “in­fight­ing” with the eu­phem­ism “cre­at­ive ten­sion.”

Tell that to Cruz and Lee, who con­tin­ued their usu­al jabs at the Re­pub­lic­an es­tab­lish­ment in their speeches today.

Lee stayed in step with his tea-party re­sponse to the State of the Uni­on — with the mes­sage that the tea party is a force of pos­it­ive dis­rup­tion. “Most of the speak­ers you’ll hear this week will come to in­spire you, or flat­ter you, or claim solid­ar­ity with you,” he said. “I have come to chal­lenge you.”

He con­tin­ued, “The Wash­ing­ton es­tab­lish­ment can join us, fol­low us, or get out of the way.”

Cruz, like­wise, spoke dis­par­agingly of mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­ans. Talk­ing about re­cent Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates, he said, “Those are good men, those are de­cent men — but when you don’t stand and draw a clear dis­tinc­tion, when you don’t stand for prin­ciple, Demo­crats cel­eb­rate.”

In con­trast, New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie (per­haps the high­light of the morn­ing’s lineup) used lan­guage of solid­ar­ity in his well-re­ceived speech. “We have to start talk­ing about what we are for, not what we are against,” he said. “Our ideas are bet­ter than their ideas, and that’s what we have to stand up for.” As Pew and oth­er polling out­lets have found, however, that Re­pub­lic­an idea is in flux. For in­stance, on the re­cent budget de­bates, Pew found that while 64 per­cent of tea-party Re­pub­lic­ans say it’s im­port­ant to stick to po­s­i­tions, 60 per­cent of main­stream Re­pub­lic­ans say com­prom­ise is more im­port­ant.

Watch­ing CPAC this morn­ing, it’s clear that the uni­fy­ing theme is a dis­gust with the cur­rent pres­id­ent (Bobby Jin­dal in no un­clear terms called Pres­id­ent Obama stu­pid). But is that enough to write the party’s next pres­id­en­tial plat­form? For now, the cre­at­ive ten­sion car­ries on.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.