Judge: Feds Can’t Stop Your Drone Delivery

Are beer-by-drone orders now legal?

National Journal
Dustin Volz
March 7, 2014, 5:56 a.m.

An ad­min­is­trat­ive judge ruled late Thursday that the gov­ern­ment does not pos­sess clear au­thor­ity to ban the com­mer­cial use of drones in the U.S., a de­cision that could have mo­nu­ment­al rami­fic­a­tions for the bud­ding in­dustry — and im­me­di­ately al­low the beer-by-drone de­liv­er­ies many have been wait­ing for.

The de­cision from Na­tion­al Trans­port­a­tion Safety Board Judge Patrick Ger­aghty as­serts that doc­u­ments cited by the Fed­er­al Avi­ation Ad­min­is­tra­tion to jus­ti­fy its drone ban were meant for in­tern­al use by of­fi­cials or failed to com­ply with prop­er rule-mak­ing guidelines.

Ger­aghty also said the agency’s ex­ist­ing reg­u­la­tions on air­craft do not en­com­pass small aer­i­al sys­tems, mean­ing that com­mer­cial drone use could be con­sidered leg­al im­me­di­ately.

The case, Pirk­er v. Huerta, in­volved a Swiss drone op­er­at­or who was fined $10,00 for reck­lessly pi­lot­ing a drone dur­ing the film­ing of a com­mer­cial for the Uni­versity of Vir­gin­ia. Though the FAA has sent nu­mer­ous or­ders to cease drone op­er­a­tions, Raphael Pirk­er was the first to be hit with a fine for vi­ol­at­ing the ban.

Drone evan­gel­ists shouldn’t rush to cel­eb­rate too soon, however. The de­cision can still be ap­pealed to the full Na­tion­al Trans­port­a­tion Safety Board and a fed­er­al judge, mean­ing the start-and-stop in­dustry may have to con­tin­ue to wait be­fore clear, defin­it­ive guid­ance is provided by au­thor­it­ies.

But some drone en­tre­pren­eurs aren’t wait­ing for the dust to settle. The FAA told a Wis­con­sin brew­ery and fish­ing-lure com­pany Janu­ary it couldn’t use drones to de­liv­er six-packs of beer to ice fish­er­men toil­ing away on a Min­nesota lake. Though ice fish­ing sea­son is over, the busi­ness is now think­ing about how else it can use its drones to at­tract some at­ten­tion.

“I didn’t real­ize this de­cision was go­ing on,” said Jack Supple, pres­id­ent of Lake­maid Beer. “But I am go­ing to con­tact my [drone] op­er­at­or to see if we can do some tests today or to­mor­row.”

Be­fore Thursday’s rul­ing, the FAA had re­cently be­gun con­sid­er­ing case-by-case waivers for cer­tain com­mer­cial uses of drones for spe­cif­ic in­dus­tries, such as ag­ri­cul­ture. The agency said Thursday it was still re­view­ing Ger­aghty’s de­cision, a po­s­i­tion the drone lobby also struck.

In­terest in the end­less pos­sib­il­it­ies of com­mer­cial drones soared late last year, after Amazon kicked off the hol­i­day shop­ping sea­son with a demon­stra­tion of a test de­liv­ery drone on 60 Minutes.

In Novem­ber, the FAA re­leased a road map de­tail­ing its five-year goals for drone in­teg­ra­tion. The agency said that it ex­pec­ted 7,500 un­manned air­craft to dot the skies with­in that in­ter­val, and that 30,000 could take flight by 2025.

The FAA was sched­uled to set new drone rules by Septem­ber 2015, when it had hoped to de­vel­op a clear plan to safely in­teg­rate the tech­no­logy in­to com­mer­cial air­space. But last month fed­er­al reg­u­lat­ors told Con­gress the agency likely wouldn’t be ready to fully in­teg­rate by that tar­get, fol­low­ing a pat­tern of missed dead­lines set by Con­gress.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4385) }}

What We're Following See More »
How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
56 minutes ago
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
3 hours ago

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
3 hours ago

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Congress Can’t Seem Not to Pay Itself
6 hours ago

Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.

How Far Away from Cleveland is the California GOP Staying?
7 hours ago

Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."