Pentagon Proposes Military Pension Overhaul

The report is meant to provide options for an ongoing compensation and retirement commission.

SLUG: ph-shooting DATE: March 05, 2010 NEG NUMBER: 212525 LOCATION: Pentagon City Metro Stop PHOTOGRAPHER: GERALD MARTINEAU, for TWP CAPTION: We photograph people who decided to walk to the Pentagon, including many in uniform, rather than take a shuttle bus. Photo shows them crossing Army-Navy Drive.
Washington Post/Getty Images
Jordain Carney
Add to Briefcase
Jordain Carney
March 7, 2014, 10:52 a.m.

Des­pite be­ing con­sidered a third rail by many mem­bers of Con­gress, the Pentagon is rolling out pro­pos­als to over­haul its mil­it­ary re­tire­ment sys­tem — in­clud­ing of­fer­ing cash earli­er but lower­ing the life­time value for many ser­vice mem­bers, ac­cord­ing to a 44-page doc­u­ment ob­tained by Mil­it­ary Times.

Some key takeaways from the re­port:

  • The re­port lays out two con­cepts for po­ten­tial re­forms, but they would both mean a lower life­time mon­et­ary value for many fu­ture ser­vice mem­bers, com­pared with the cur­rent sys­tem.
  • Un­der one pro­pos­al, act­ive and re­serve mem­bers would get “par­tial be­ne­fits” once they re­tire from the mil­it­ary un­til they reach their early 60s. Pentagon of­fi­cials have re­peatedly poin­ted out that many mil­it­ary re­tir­ees go on to have second ca­reers be­fore leav­ing the work­force.
  • Un­der the second pro­pos­al, act­ive forces would get full be­ne­fits after they re­tire from the mil­it­ary — but the mon­et­ary value would be smal­ler than what ser­vice mem­bers get today. And re­serve mem­bers would have be­ne­fits kick in at age 60.
  • Both pro­pos­als re­quire ser­vice mem­bers to serve 20 years be­fore they are fully ves­ted in the re­tire­ment plans.
  • In both con­cepts out­lined, the Pentagon would con­trib­ute a cer­tain per­cent­age of an­nu­al base pay after two years of ser­vice to a 401(k)-like plan. Ser­vice mem­bers would be­come ves­ted if they con­tin­ue serving after six years.
  • Both pro­pos­als would of­fer a bo­nus around the 12-year mark to try to boost re­ten­tion in mid-ca­reer ser­vice mem­bers. De­fense De­part­ment of­fi­cials and mem­bers of Con­gress worry that chan­ging the cur­rent mil­it­ary sys­tem will hurt the mil­it­ary’s chances of keep­ing top tal­ent.
  • The pro­pos­als grand­fath­er in cur­rent mil­it­ary mem­bers and re­tir­ees.

The re­port stresses that the pro­pos­als are only meant to be food for thought for a com­mis­sion look­ing at com­pens­a­tion and re­tire­ment changes. Rear Adm. John Kirby, the Pentagon press sec­ret­ary, said the com­mis­sion asked for the De­fense De­part­ment to provide op­tions, and the Pentagon doesn’t side with one over the oth­er.

The Mil­it­ary Com­pens­a­tion and Re­tire­ment Mod­ern­iz­a­tion Com­mis­sion’s re­port isn’t ex­pec­ted un­til Feb­ru­ary 2015, and top Pentagon of­fi­cials in­clud­ing act­ing Deputy De­fense Sec­ret­ary Christine Fox have pledged to hold off on form­ally re­com­mend­ing any changes un­til after the com­mis­sion’s work is com­plete.

The re­port is a com­plex bal­an­cing act of try­ing to re­form a sys­tem without af­fect­ing the mil­it­ary’s abil­ity to re­tain top tal­ent and re­cog­niz­ing, as De­fense of­fi­cials have said, that something has got to give.

But per­son­nel costs have long been con­sidered sac­red ground for Con­gress, and law­makers are quickly over­turn­ing most of a $6 bil­lion cut to work­ing-age mil­it­ary re­tir­ee pen­sions in­cluded in Decem­ber’s budget agree­ment. The Pentagon is already fa­cing an up­hill battle on a hand­ful of changes it is hop­ing to make as part of its fisc­al 2015 budget re­quest.

What We're Following See More »
OUTLAYS TO DECREASE 2% PER YEAR
Trump Budget Would Cut $1.4 Trillion from Non-Defense Spending
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
Source:
MORE PROBLEMS FOR WHITE HOUSE
Flynn Lied To Investigators About Foreign Payments
6 hours ago
BREAKING
COMEY WANTS TO TALK TO MUELLER FIRST
Chaffetz Postpones Comey’s Testimony
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Former FBI Director Jim Comey won't be testifying before Jason Chaffetz's House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Wednesday as originally planned. Chaffetz, the committee chairman, "announced Monday that Comey wants to speak with Robert Mueller, the former FBI director now serving as a special counsel overseeing the agency's investigation into the Trump campaign's ties to Russia during the 2016 campaign, before testifying publicly."

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many Examples of Plagiarism Did CNN Find in Sheriff Clarke’s Thesis?
8 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Forty-seven. The Milwaukee official is up for a position in the Department of Homeland Security.

Source:
TOOTHLESS?
UN Security Council Condemns N. Korea Launch
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login