For Rick Santorum, It’s 2012 All Over Again

Santorum’s linguistic gripes and emphasis on the blue-collar vote is the same speech he’s been giving for years.

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Lucia Graves
March 7, 2014, 11:02 a.m.

For any­one who fol­lowed the 2012 pres­id­en­tial-elec­tion cycle, Rick San­tor­um’s speech Fri­day prob­ably soun­ded fa­mil­i­ar.

In 2012, San­tor­um had so­lid­i­fied his role as the nice guy in the race. And in his speech at the Con­ser­vat­ive Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Con­fer­ence this year, he re­minded every­one why.

“We’re told we have to put aside what we be­lieve is the best in­terest of the coun­try so that a Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate can win,” he told a packed audi­ence. “That may res­ult in a win for a Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate but it will be a dev­ast­at­ing loss for Amer­ica.”

He em­phas­ized con­ser­vat­ive val­ues like re­claim­ing the “true beau­ti­ful in­sti­tu­tion of mar­riage” over fight­ing with fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans, and waxed nos­tal­gic about everything he did back in his fa­vor­ite year: 2012.

“I didn’t run to carry the agenda,” he said with­in the first few minutes of his speech. “I didn’t run to put forth is­sues. I ran be­cause I wanted us to win the White House.” He also drew a dir­ect line between his race in 2012 and Re­agan’s 1976 race, stress­ing that Re­agan won not be­cause he was a cul­tur­al con­ser­vat­ive but be­cause he fo­cused on work­ing Amer­ic­ans.

That fed per­fectly in­to one of San­tor­um’s top gripes from 2012: the term “middle-class,” or class-any­thing, really.

“Do you really ac­cept the idea that there are classes in Amer­ica?” he de­man­ded of the as­sembled con­ser­vat­ives, ex­plain­ing they should really all use the term “work­ing Amer­ic­ans” in­stead. Be­cause un­like Demo­crats (who pre­sum­ably hate work and love wel­fare), “we be­lieve work is a good thing.”

“They use the class rhet­or­ic be­cause they’re all about di­vid­ing,” he said, “That’s what they do, they di­vide. Let them di­vide; let us uni­fy!”

He made that point to con­sid­er­able cheers. It’s also one he’s made be­fore.

At an event with his GOP primary com­pet­it­ors in Janu­ary 2012, he chided Mitt Rom­ney for us­ing pre­cisely this lan­guage:

The gov­ernor used a term earli­er that I shrink from. It’s one that I don’t think we should be us­ing as Re­pub­lic­ans, “middle class.” There are no classes in Amer­ica. We are a coun­try that don’t al­low for titles. We don’t put people in classes. There may be middle-in­come people, but the idea that some­how or an­oth­er we’re go­ing to buy in­to the class-war­fare ar­gu­ments of Barack Obama is something that should not be part of the Re­pub­lic­an lex­icon.

Pre­vi­ously he had at­tacked Obama with a very sim­il­ar talk­ing point. “You’ll nev­er hear the word ‘class’ come out of my mouth,” he said. “Classes? We spe­cific­ally re­jec­ted that. Look in the Con­sti­tu­tion.”

He likes the point so much, in fact, that he kept us­ing it even after he left the cam­paign trail. While speak­ing at a GOP fun­draiser in Au­gust of last year, he told the audi­ence:

Don’t use the term the oth­er side uses. What does Barack Obama talk about all the time? The middle class,” he said at a fun­draiser hos­ted by the Ly­on County GOP. “Since when in Amer­ica do we have classes? Since when in Amer­ica are people stuck in areas or defined places called a class? That’s Marx­ism talk.

A tweet by Slate‘s Dave Wei­gel summed it up: “San­tor­um giv­ing the same ‘I could have won in 2012 be­cause blue col­lar’ speech he’s giv­en for a year.”

In­deed, it looks like mostly what we were get­ting was a sales pitch. San­tor­um’s book on how the GOP can ap­peal to blue-col­lar work­ers is ex­pec­ted out later this year. And if Re­pub­lic­ans’ struggle to cap­ture the blue-col­lar vote in the last elec­tion cycle is any in­dic­a­tion, the book will sell.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.