Even though a recently released defense-strategy report scarcely mentions Russia, don’t expect the Pentagon to brush it aside anytime soon.
A “wholesale redo” of the review, which broadly outlines the Defense Department’s strategy every four years, isn’t necessary — despite the crisis in Ukraine, Christine Wormuth, deputy undersecretary of defense for strategy, plans, and force development, said Monday.
The 64-page document, which came out March 4, made little mention of Russia, dedicating just one paragraph to outlining the possible risks it may pose to Washington’s or its allies’ interests.
The document did note that some of Russia’s military actions could “violate the sovereignty of its neighbors” and “present risks,” adding that the United States will try to work with Russia to “reduce the risk of military miscalculation.”
But the Pentagon’s review is “kind of broadly envisioned and would allow us to kind of do the kinds of things that we need to do to both support the government of Ukraine and reassure our NATO allies,” Wormuth said.
But if the Defense Department wants to be able to tackle a swath of issues outlined in the defense review — ranging from containing Russian influence or shifting the U.S. focus to the Asia-Pacific region — it will need Congress to cough up the extra $115 billion over five years the administration has requested in its five-year budget plan, Wormuth said.
“This is not a post-Cold War, early-90s kind of security environment,” said Wormuth, who is also the president’s nominee to become the department’s undersecretary for policy. “You can’t live in a mansion if you’re working on a middle-class salary. At a certain point we are going to have to ask ourselves, ‘What kind of nation do we want to be?’ “
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.