Even though a recently released defense-strategy report scarcely mentions Russia, don’t expect the Pentagon to brush it aside anytime soon.
A “wholesale redo” of the review, which broadly outlines the Defense Department’s strategy every four years, isn’t necessary — despite the crisis in Ukraine, Christine Wormuth, deputy undersecretary of defense for strategy, plans, and force development, said Monday.
The 64-page document, which came out March 4, made little mention of Russia, dedicating just one paragraph to outlining the possible risks it may pose to Washington’s or its allies’ interests.
The document did note that some of Russia’s military actions could “violate the sovereignty of its neighbors” and “present risks,” adding that the United States will try to work with Russia to “reduce the risk of military miscalculation.”
But the Pentagon’s review is “kind of broadly envisioned and would allow us to kind of do the kinds of things that we need to do to both support the government of Ukraine and reassure our NATO allies,” Wormuth said.
But if the Defense Department wants to be able to tackle a swath of issues outlined in the defense review — ranging from containing Russian influence or shifting the U.S. focus to the Asia-Pacific region — it will need Congress to cough up the extra $115 billion over five years the administration has requested in its five-year budget plan, Wormuth said.
“This is not a post-Cold War, early-90s kind of security environment,” said Wormuth, who is also the president’s nominee to become the department’s undersecretary for policy. “You can’t live in a mansion if you’re working on a middle-class salary. At a certain point we are going to have to ask ourselves, ‘What kind of nation do we want to be?’ “
What We're Following See More »
Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.
"It was obvious he wasn't prepared." “He only mentioned her email scandal once." "I think he took things a little too personal and missed a lot of opportunities to make very good debate points." That's just a smattering of the reactions of some elected Republicans to Donald Trump's debate performance.