Sen. Feinstein: CIA Hacked Congress and Possibly ‘Violated’ Constitution

The Senate Intelligence Committee leader accused the CIA of interfering with its investigation into the agency’s old interrogation programs.

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 26: Committee chairman Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) (C), ranking member Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) (R) and Sen. John Rockefeller (D-WV) (L) listen during a hearing before the Senate (Select) Intelligence Committee September 26,2 103 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The hearing was focused on the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) Legislation.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
March 11, 2014, 6:11 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4807) }}

The power­ful chair­wo­man of the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee charged the CIA on Tues­day morn­ing with cov­ertly re­mov­ing key doc­u­ments from com­puters used by her pan­el’s staff to in­vest­ig­ate the gov­ern­ment’s in­ter­rog­a­tion prac­tices.

In an im­pas­sioned 40-minute speech on the Sen­ate floor ac­cus­ing the in­tel­li­gence agency of pos­sibly vi­ol­at­ing the Con­sti­tu­tion, Di­anne Fein­stein la­cer­ated the CIA for ac­cess­ing in Janu­ary the com­puter files used by com­mit­tee staffers to re­view the CIA’s now-de­funct in­ter­rog­a­tion pro­grams. By do­ing so, the in­tel­li­gence agency would have vi­ol­ated a clear agree­ment that it had made with Fein­stein’s com­mit­tee that it would re­frain from mon­it­or­ing its re­view.

“I have grave con­cerns that the CIA search may well have vi­ol­ated the sep­ar­a­tion-of-powers prin­ciples em­bod­ied in the United States Con­sti­tu­tion, in­clud­ing the speech and de­bate clause,” the Cali­for­nia Demo­crat said. “It may have un­der­mined the con­sti­tu­tion­al frame­work es­sen­tial to ef­fect­ive con­gres­sion­al over­sight of in­tel­li­gence activ­it­ies or any oth­er gov­ern­ment func­tion.”

John Bren­nan, the CIA’s cur­rent dir­ect­or, flatly denied Fein­stein’s ac­cus­a­tions, telling NBC News re­port­er An­drea Mitchell later in the day that “the al­leg­a­tions of the CIA hack­ing in­to com­puters … [are] bey­ond the scope of reas­on.”

And Sen. Saxby Cham­b­liss, the com­mit­tee’s top Re­pub­lic­an, said he did not agree with Fein­stein’s con­clu­sions.

“We have some dis­agree­ments as to what the find­ings are,” Cham­b­liss said. “Right now we don’t know what the facts are,” he said, adding that the com­mit­tee will at­tempt to re­solve the is­sue in­tern­ally.

Fein­stein, who is fre­quently re­garded as one of the in­tel­li­gence com­munity’s most res­ol­ute de­fend­ers, said she has also asked the CIA for an apo­logy and re­cog­ni­tion of wrong­do­ing. So far, however, she said she has re­ceived neither — and she stopped just short of say­ing that in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials lied to her pan­el.

“How can its of­fi­cial re­sponse to our study stand fac­tu­ally in con­flict with its own in­tern­al re­view?” Fein­stein asked.

Fein­stein’s pre­pared re­marks, which she said were de­livered to cor­rect mis­in­form­a­tion cir­cu­lat­ing in the press, ar­rive a week after she con­firmed the CIA was un­der in­vest­ig­a­tion by the Justice De­part­ment for po­ten­tially spy­ing on her com­mit­tee. The in­tel­li­gence agency is barred from spy­ing on Amer­ic­ans, and sur­repti­tious tap­ping in­to com­puters used by mem­bers of Con­gress and its staff presents con­cerns about the sep­ar­a­tion of powers en­shrined in the Con­sti­tu­tion.

To­ward the end of her lengthy speech, Fein­stein enu­mer­ated the laws she be­lieves the CIA may have broken: the Fourth Amend­ment, which pro­tects from un­reas­on­able search and seizure; the Com­puter Fraud and Ab­use Act; and Ex­ec­ut­ive Or­der 12333, which bars do­mest­ic sur­veil­lance.

Im­me­di­ately after Fein­stein’s speech, Sen­ate Pres­id­ent Pro Tem­pore Patrick Leahy told the cham­ber, “I’ve heard thou­sands of speeches on this floor. I can­not think of any speech by any mem­ber of either party as im­port­ant as the one the sen­at­or from Cali­for­nia just gave.” Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id later piled on: “There’s no one that has more cour­age and con­vic­tion than Di­anne Fein­stein.”

Con­gress cre­ated the House and Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence com­mit­tees in the 1970s to over­see the CIA, the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency, and oth­er spy agen­cies after un­cov­er­ing a string of spy­ing ab­uses.

Elahe Izadi contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×