Sen. Feinstein: CIA Hacked Congress and Possibly ‘Violated’ Constitution

The Senate Intelligence Committee leader accused the CIA of interfering with its investigation into the agency’s old interrogation programs.

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 26: Committee chairman Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) (C), ranking member Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) (R) and Sen. John Rockefeller (D-WV) (L) listen during a hearing before the Senate (Select) Intelligence Committee September 26,2 103 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The hearing was focused on the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) Legislation.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
March 11, 2014, 6:11 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4807) }}

The power­ful chair­wo­man of the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee charged the CIA on Tues­day morn­ing with cov­ertly re­mov­ing key doc­u­ments from com­puters used by her pan­el’s staff to in­vest­ig­ate the gov­ern­ment’s in­ter­rog­a­tion prac­tices.

In an im­pas­sioned 40-minute speech on the Sen­ate floor ac­cus­ing the in­tel­li­gence agency of pos­sibly vi­ol­at­ing the Con­sti­tu­tion, Di­anne Fein­stein la­cer­ated the CIA for ac­cess­ing in Janu­ary the com­puter files used by com­mit­tee staffers to re­view the CIA’s now-de­funct in­ter­rog­a­tion pro­grams. By do­ing so, the in­tel­li­gence agency would have vi­ol­ated a clear agree­ment that it had made with Fein­stein’s com­mit­tee that it would re­frain from mon­it­or­ing its re­view.

“I have grave con­cerns that the CIA search may well have vi­ol­ated the sep­ar­a­tion-of-powers prin­ciples em­bod­ied in the United States Con­sti­tu­tion, in­clud­ing the speech and de­bate clause,” the Cali­for­nia Demo­crat said. “It may have un­der­mined the con­sti­tu­tion­al frame­work es­sen­tial to ef­fect­ive con­gres­sion­al over­sight of in­tel­li­gence activ­it­ies or any oth­er gov­ern­ment func­tion.”

John Bren­nan, the CIA’s cur­rent dir­ect­or, flatly denied Fein­stein’s ac­cus­a­tions, telling NBC News re­port­er An­drea Mitchell later in the day that “the al­leg­a­tions of the CIA hack­ing in­to com­puters … [are] bey­ond the scope of reas­on.”

And Sen. Saxby Cham­b­liss, the com­mit­tee’s top Re­pub­lic­an, said he did not agree with Fein­stein’s con­clu­sions.

“We have some dis­agree­ments as to what the find­ings are,” Cham­b­liss said. “Right now we don’t know what the facts are,” he said, adding that the com­mit­tee will at­tempt to re­solve the is­sue in­tern­ally.

Fein­stein, who is fre­quently re­garded as one of the in­tel­li­gence com­munity’s most res­ol­ute de­fend­ers, said she has also asked the CIA for an apo­logy and re­cog­ni­tion of wrong­do­ing. So far, however, she said she has re­ceived neither — and she stopped just short of say­ing that in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials lied to her pan­el.

“How can its of­fi­cial re­sponse to our study stand fac­tu­ally in con­flict with its own in­tern­al re­view?” Fein­stein asked.

Fein­stein’s pre­pared re­marks, which she said were de­livered to cor­rect mis­in­form­a­tion cir­cu­lat­ing in the press, ar­rive a week after she con­firmed the CIA was un­der in­vest­ig­a­tion by the Justice De­part­ment for po­ten­tially spy­ing on her com­mit­tee. The in­tel­li­gence agency is barred from spy­ing on Amer­ic­ans, and sur­repti­tious tap­ping in­to com­puters used by mem­bers of Con­gress and its staff presents con­cerns about the sep­ar­a­tion of powers en­shrined in the Con­sti­tu­tion.

To­ward the end of her lengthy speech, Fein­stein enu­mer­ated the laws she be­lieves the CIA may have broken: the Fourth Amend­ment, which pro­tects from un­reas­on­able search and seizure; the Com­puter Fraud and Ab­use Act; and Ex­ec­ut­ive Or­der 12333, which bars do­mest­ic sur­veil­lance.

Im­me­di­ately after Fein­stein’s speech, Sen­ate Pres­id­ent Pro Tem­pore Patrick Leahy told the cham­ber, “I’ve heard thou­sands of speeches on this floor. I can­not think of any speech by any mem­ber of either party as im­port­ant as the one the sen­at­or from Cali­for­nia just gave.” Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id later piled on: “There’s no one that has more cour­age and con­vic­tion than Di­anne Fein­stein.”

Con­gress cre­ated the House and Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence com­mit­tees in the 1970s to over­see the CIA, the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency, and oth­er spy agen­cies after un­cov­er­ing a string of spy­ing ab­uses.

What We're Following See More »
LEGACY PLAY
Sanders and Clinton Spar Over … President Obama
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”

THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

DIRECT APPEAL TO MINORITIES, WOMEN
Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
15 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

Source:
WEEKEND DATA DUMP
State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Source:
×