Members of Congress: We’re the Worst Ever

What does it mean when even the most skilled lawmakers in Congress are giving up?

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Lucia Graves
March 11, 2014, 8:23 a.m.

Grid­lock and ac­ri­mo­ni­ous par­tis­an­ship are noth­ing new to vet­er­an law­makers. But in an in­ter­view pub­lished Monday in The Hill, they said something that is: The 113th Con­gress just might be the most ter­rible ever.

“It’s cer­tainly the worst Con­gress since I’ve been in Con­gress,” said Rep. Henry Wax­man, a Cali­for­nia Demo­crat who’s served on Cap­it­ol Hill for 40 years. “We’ve got­ten very little done.”

And Wax­man, who was first elec­ted in 1972, has the con­gres­sion­al bona fides to make that dia­gnos­is.

It’s not just that he’s been there a long time; he knows how to work the sys­tem. “I have prob­ably passed more le­gis­la­tion in­to law than any sit­ting mem­ber of the House,” Wax­man told Na­tion­al Journ­al back in April, “with the pos­sible ex­cep­tion of John Din­gell.” (At least one ana­lyst con­firmed his self-as­sess­ment.)

Din­gell, the longest-serving mem­ber in his­tory, also called the 113th Con­gress more un­pro­duct­ive than any he’d seen. “We only passed 55, 57 bills,” the Michigan Demo­crat told The Hill. “That in­dic­ates a very low level of pro­ductiv­ity.”

Wax­man and Din­gell are part of what Na­tion­al Journ­al has re­ferred to as “The Ex­odus of Prob­lem Solv­ers on Cap­it­ol Hill.” As Norm Orn­stein wrote in Feb­ru­ary, the re­tir­ees share a com­mon char­ac­ter­ist­ic: “They rep­res­ent a heav­ily dis­pro­por­tion­ate share of those who would fit com­fort­ably in a Prob­lem-Solv­ing Caucus if one ex­is­ted.” If the most skilled politi­cians have giv­en up, what can we ex­pect of the rest of them? The up­shot is that the re­mainder of the year will likely be even more un­pro­duct­ive than what we have seen so far, with policy areas like im­mig­ra­tion and tax re­form dwarfed by con­cerns about midterm elec­tions.

Of course, most law­makers re­tire for per­son­al reas­ons. But Din­gell has ex­pli­citly cited dis­sat­is­fac­tion with the body’s ef­fic­acy as among his in­cent­ives to leave, telling The New York Times that Con­gress had be­come “ob­nox­ious.”

That sen­ti­ment is re­mark­ably in tune with Amer­ic­ans’ per­cep­tions of Con­gress. In Decem­ber of last year, Gal­lup polling found voters’ ap­prov­al of Con­gress av­er­aged 14 per­cent in 2013, the low­est since their polling began. Earli­er this year, the body’s ap­prov­al rat­ing stood at just 13 per­cent.

There’s been plenty of spec­u­la­tion about why those num­bers are so low. A new work­ing pa­per pub­lished by two polit­ic­al-sci­ence gradu­ates sug­ges­ted it’s be­cause politi­cians tend to vastly over­es­tim­ate how con­ser­vat­ive their elect­or­ate is. And an art­icle in For­bes some­what pre­dict­ably blamed the me­dia. But it’s time we con­sidered a dif­fer­ent al­tern­at­ive.

Maybe, just maybe, Amer­ic­ans think Con­gress is the worst ever be­cause it is, in fact, the worst ever.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
2 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
2 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
2 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login