GOP Goes Head Hunting in EPA Climate Probe

The smoke stacks at American Electric Power's (AEP) Mountaineer coal power plant in New Haven, West Virginia, October 30, 2009. In cooperation with AEP, the French company Alstom unveiled the world's largest carbon capture facility at a coal plant, so called 'clean coal,' which will store around 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide a year 2,1 kilometers (7,200 feet) underground.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
March 12, 2014, 10:41 a.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans are get­ting more ag­gress­ive in their ef­fort to trans­form ob­scure pro­vi­sions of a 2005 en­ergy law in­to the strands that un­ravel EPA’s car­bon-emis­sions rules for newly con­struc­ted power plants.

The En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee’s GOP lead­ers, in a new let­ter to the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency, de­mand the names of people at EPA who de­term­ined that the pro­posed emis­sions rules don’t run afoul of the En­ergy Policy Act of 2005.

The let­ter also seeks a slew of in­tern­al doc­u­ments.

Here’s what the fight is about: The 2005 law au­thor­izes tax cred­its and En­ergy De­part­ment fund­ing for pro­jects us­ing tech­no­logy that traps car­bon emis­sions from coal-based en­ergy pro­jects.

But pro­vi­sions in the same law say a tech­no­logy can’t form the basis for fu­ture EPA reg­u­la­tions simply be­cause it’s de­ployed at these “clean-coal” pro­jects.

EPA rules pro­posed in Septem­ber would re­quire fu­ture coal-fired power plants to trap and store a sub­stan­tial amount of their car­bon emis­sions.

The 2005 pro­vi­sions sud­denly mat­ter be­cause EPA has poin­ted to En­ergy De­part­ment-backed pro­jects when mak­ing the case that car­bon cap­ture and stor­age is far enough along to form the basis for the rule.

But EPA says it’s in the clear, be­cause this hand­ful of pro­jects backed un­der the 2005 law are far from the sole basis for the agency’s de­term­in­a­tion that CCS is ready for prime time.

The agency, in a de­tailed memo re­leased sev­er­al weeks ago, said it also re­viewed pro­jects that aren’t fun­ded un­der the 2005 law and oth­er in­form­a­tion.

But Re­pub­lic­ans say they’re not con­vinced. The let­ter seeks ex­pans­ive doc­u­ment­a­tion from EPA on the top­ic, such as in­tern­al emails and com­mu­nic­a­tions with oth­er agen­cies.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
13 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×