The Last Drug Czar?

The mixed record of Obama’s outgoing drug chief.

Gil Kerlikowske heads for a press conference at the Mexican Foreign Ministry building on June 22, 2011 in Mexico City.
National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
Lucia Graves
March 13, 2014, 7:06 a.m.

It might as well have been a life­time ago when Gil Ker­likowske began his job as the na­tion’s top drug of­fi­cial back in 2009.

When Pres­id­ent Obama ap­poin­ted him to be dir­ect­or of the Of­fice of Na­tion­al Drug Con­trol Policy — a po­s­i­tion known as the “drug czar” — only a dozen-plus states had leg­al­ized med­ic­al marijuana; a poll show­ing a minor­ity of Amer­ic­ans sup­port leg­al­iz­a­tion could still be con­sidered “re­cord break­ing;” and the dis­par­ity in sen­tences for users of crack and users of co­caine was still 100-1. The idea that two states would soon fully leg­al­ize the re­cre­ation­al use of marijuana seemed ab­surd.

Ker­likowske was fresh off a gig as po­lice chief in Seattle, a city known for ex­per­i­ment­ing with pro­gress­ive drug pro­grams, giv­ing re­formers some hope and drug war­ri­ors some heart­burn. But after a ten­ure that proved to be re­l­at­ively con­ven­tion­al, Ker­likowske has been tapped to head Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion, and is ex­pec­ted to be re­placed by someone who could rep­res­ent a sea change in fed­er­al drug policy.

When Ker­likowske was first ap­poin­ted, re­formers hoped it signaled a shift from the typ­ic­al fed­er­al ap­proach em­phas­iz­ing ar­rest and pro­sec­u­tion to a more mod­ern one, centered around edu­ca­tion and pre­ven­tion. It was a no­tion Ker­likowske had paid con­sid­er­able lip ser­vice to, prom­ising in his first in­ter­view as drug czar to end the “war on drugs” and, later, to pro­mote pub­lic health solu­tions and a “21st cen­tury” ap­proach.

People on the en­force­ment side of things wor­ried that would come at the ex­pense of law en­force­ment. As it turns out, they needn’t have wor­ried.

“He’s been an ex­tremely valu­able part­ner and someone we could re­li­ably ex­pect to work with us, co­oper­ate with us, and ap­prise us of where the ad­min­is­tra­tion was headed,” said Jim Pasko, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Fraternal Or­der of Po­lice, the na­tion’s largest law-en­force­ment labor or­gan­iz­a­tion. “We were very happy with him.”

The White House budget for 2014 de­votes 57 per­cent of drug-con­trol spend­ing to pun­ish­ment and in­ter­dic­tion while just 43 per­cent went to treat­ment and pre­ven­tion. Ker­likowske has noted such num­bers in­creased treat­ment and pre­ven­tion fund­ing from pre­vi­ous years, and there’s some truth to that. But look a little fur­ther back, and you’ll see OND­CP is just now bring­ing this ra­tio in­to line with about where George W. Bush had it in fisc­al year 2004.

Marijuana Ma­jor­ity spokes­man Tom An­gell was un­der­whelmed by what Ker­likowske billed as pro­gress. “If the ad­min­is­tra­tion really be­lieves drug ab­use is a health is­sue that we can’t ar­rest our way out of, they need to put their money where their mouth is and stop em­phas­iz­ing de­vot­ing so many re­sources to the same old failed ‘lock ‘em up’ policies,” An­gell said. “It’s quite dis­con­cert­ing that spend­ing for the Bur­eau of Pris­ons is go­ing up at a time when the at­tor­ney gen­er­al of the United States says we are in­car­cer­at­ing far too many people for far too long at too great a cost.”

It’s not just Ker­likowske’s re­cord on marijuana that re­formers take is­sue with. The num­ber of over­dose deaths from heroin has in­creased dra­mat­ic­ally in re­cent years, grow­ing 45 per­cent between 2006 and 2010, ac­cord­ing to OND­CP. The up­tick in deaths has been shown to be cor­rel­ated with the the re­cent crack­down on pre­scrip­tion drugs. Ker­likowske has ad­mit­ted that heroin “was not on the radar screen” dur­ing most of Obama’s first term, ac­cord­ing to The Wash­ing­ton Post, and that he “didn’t do everything I should have” to raise aware­ness of the prob­lem.

Kev­in Sa­bet, a former OND­CP of­ficer who now runs the anti-leg­al­iz­a­tion group Smart Ap­proaches to Marijuana, doesn’t hold Ker­likowske re­spons­ible for that. “No one can pos­sibly blame the of­fice for de­vot­ing so many re­sources — so quickly — to re­du­cing the pre­scrip­tion-pill epi­dem­ic,” he said in an email. “Ac­tion was swift and cer­tain, as it had to be. Is the cur­rent surge in heroin ad­dic­tion a res­ult of a crack­down on pills? I don’t know, but no one can blame someone for tak­ing ac­tion on a hor­rible pub­lic-health crisis.”

Bill Piper, dir­ect­or of na­tion­al af­fairs for Drug Policy Al­li­ance, a pro-re­form group in Wash­ing­ton, sees Ker­likowske’s re­cord as mixed. “It’s in­ter­est­ing be­cause tra­di­tion­ally drug czars have been pro­pa­gand­ists for the fed­er­al war on drugs” he said. “Since the cre­ation of OND­CP, they’ve largely been cheer­lead­ers for the drug war; they’ve put polit­ics over sci­ence; they’ve op­posed re­form; and stifled de­bate. Drug czar John Wal­ters, who was Bush’s drug czar, once com­pared drug users to ter­ror­ists.”

By con­trast, Piper called Ker­likowske’s ap­proach “a re­fresh­ing change.” He sup­por­ted the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s re­form agenda around crack sen­ten­cing re­form and over­dose pre­ven­tion, as well as syr­inge-ex­change pro­grams. He also helped to change some of the rhet­or­ic around the is­sues, con­stantly say­ing that drug re­form should be treated as a health is­sue in­stead of a crim­in­al-justice is­sue.

“All of that is good,” Piper said. “But his rhet­or­ic hasn’t al­ways matched up with his ac­tions. This is es­pe­cially the case with marijuana.”

Sa­bet blames en­vir­on­ment­al factors for any short­com­ings. “Gil Ker­likowske was one of the most ef­fect­ive drug czars, work­ing in one of the most dif­fi­cult en­vir­on­ments a drug-con­trol dir­ect­or has ever had to work in,” he said. “He was the head of drug policy in a White House largely ag­nost­ic about today’s great drug-policy de­bates, and that makes it dif­fi­cult.”

Some drug re­formers spec­u­late the White House moved Ker­likowske be­cause he’s out of step with the trend to­ward lib­er­al­iz­a­tion of marijuana, not­ing his out­spoken op­pos­i­tion to a Cali­for­nia ref­er­en­dum that would have leg­al­ized the drug in 2010. “It makes me won­der if that’s why he left,” Piper said.

A back­ground in law en­force­ment, or a hawk­ish polit­ic­al ca­reer, used to be an un­writ­ten re­quire­ment for as­sum­ing the po­s­i­tion of drug czar. Now, for the first time, we’re see­ing something dif­fer­ent.

Ker­likowske’s in­ter­im re­place­ment, act­ing dir­ect­or Mi­chael Bot­ti­celli, hails from a back­ground in pub­lic health and has even re­ceived ser­vice awards for pro­mot­ing re­cov­ery ad­dic­tion. Bot­ti­celli, who served as Ker­likowske’s deputy at OND­CP, is the former dir­ect­or of the Mas­sachu­setts Sub­stance Ab­use Ser­vices Bur­eau, where he ex­pan­ded treat­ment and re­cov­ery ser­vices and helped es­tab­lish early in­ter­ven­tion treat­ment pro­grams for ad­oles­cents. It’s un­clear wheth­er he’ll be form­ally nom­in­ated by the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, and even more un­clear that he could clear a Sen­ate vote. But if he is chosen, it would mark the first time in his­tory someone with a back­ground in pro­mot­ing ad­dic­tion re­cov­ery be­came the na­tion’s top drug of­fi­cial — since he’s in charge now, it already does.

“It’s still an open ques­tion on where he’s go­ing to be on marijuana,” said Drug Policy Al­li­ance’s Piper. “We hope that he’s evid­ence-based on that, but it’s nice to see someone at the helm who has a health back­ground in­stead of a law-en­force­ment back­ground. We’re hop­ing to be able to work with him where there’s com­mon ground.”

What We're Following See More »
THE PLAN ALL ALONG?
Manchin Drops Objections, Clearing Way for Spending Deal
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate standstill over a stopgap spending bill appeared headed toward a resolution on Friday night. Senators who were holding up the measure said votes are expected later in the evening. West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin had raised objections to the continuing resolution because it did not include a full year's extension of retired coal miners' health benefits," but Manchin "said he and other coal state Democrats agreed with Senate Democratic leaders during a caucus meeting Thursday that they would not block the continuing resolution, but rather use the shutdown threat as a way to highlight the health care and pension needs of the miners."

Source:
UNCLEAR WHAT CAUSED CHANGE OF HEART
Giuliani Out of Running For State
14 hours ago
BREAKING

Donald Trump transition team announced Friday afternoon that top supporter Rudy Giuliani has taken himself out of the running to be in Trump's cabinet, though CNN previously reported that it was Trump who informed the former New York City mayor that he would not be receiving a slot. While the field had seemingly been narrowed last week, it appears to be wide open once again, with ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson the current favorite.

Source:
ALSO VICE-CHAIR OF TRUMP’S TRANSITION TEAM
Trump Taps Rep. McMorris Rodgers for Interior Secretary
19 hours ago
BREAKING
SHUTDOWN LOOMING
House Approves Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has completed it's business for 2016 by passing a spending bill which will keep the government funded through April 28. The final vote tally was 326-96. The bill's standing in the Senate is a bit tenuous at the moment, as a trio of Democratic Senators have pledged to block the bill unless coal miners get a permanent extension on retirement and health benefits. The government runs out of money on Friday night.

HEADS TO OBAMA
Senate Approves Defense Bill
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The Senate passed the National Defense Authorization Act today, sending the $618 billion measure to President Obama. The president vetoed the defense authorization bill a year ago, but both houses could override his disapproval this time around.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login