NSA Denies Using Facebook to Hack Into Your Computer

An agency statement rebuffs a recent report that it has masqueraded as the social network.

Activists protest the surveillance of U.S. citizens by the NSA outside the Justice Department where President Barack Obama gave a major speech on reforming the NSA January 17, 2014.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
March 13, 2014, 2:07 p.m.

The Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency on Thursday denied us­ing a dop­pel­gang­er ver­sion of Face­book, say­ing it lacks the abil­ity to do so and only con­ducts for­eign in­tel­li­gence op­er­a­tions that are “law­ful and ap­pro­pri­ate.”

“NSA does not use its tech­nic­al cap­ab­il­it­ies to im­per­son­ate U.S. com­pany web­sites,” the agency said in a state­ment. “Nor does NSA tar­get any user of glob­al In­ter­net ser­vices without ap­pro­pri­ate leg­al au­thor­ity. Re­ports of in­dis­crim­in­ate com­puter ex­ploit­a­tion op­er­a­tions are simply false.”

The ma­ligned fed­er­al agency was hit with a re­newed wave of flog­ging Wed­nes­day after a re­port by First Look Me­dia said the NSA had at times “mas­quer­aded as a fake Face­book serv­er” in or­der to in­fect tar­geted com­puters with mal­ware. Doc­u­ments from 2009 provided by former NSA con­tract­or Ed­ward Snowden pub­lished in the re­port de­tailed a secret pro­gram called “Tur­bine” that was de­signed to hack in­to com­puters and gath­er data from for­eign net­works.

Nowhere in the NSA’s state­ment, however, does it defin­it­ively state that the agency has nev­er pre­vi­ously posed as an­oth­er web­site for sur­veil­lance pur­poses. The agency is known for its care­fully worded state­ments couched in qual­i­fy­ing lan­guage.

In re­sponse to the story, a Face­book spokes­man told Na­tion­al Journ­al that the NSA could not cur­rently spoof its site in the man­ner de­scribed in the First Look re­port be­cause the site fin­ished in­teg­rat­ing se­cure com­mu­nic­a­tions pro­tocol last year. But Face­book didn’t rule out that such ex­ploit­a­tion could have oc­curred in the past, when stand­ard com­mu­nic­a­tions pro­tocol was used.

The com­pany ad­di­tion­ally denied ever hav­ing evid­ence or know­ledge of the spy pro­gram.

Earli­er on Thursday, Face­book founder Mark Zuck­er­berg pos­ted a pub­lic note on his page that cri­ti­cized Pres­id­ent Obama and his ad­min­is­tra­tion for its sur­veil­lance pro­grams.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
1 days ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×