A new federal assessment links numerous avoidable errors to a fire last month at an atomic-waste burial site in New Mexico, the Associated Press reports.
The Feb. 5 conflagration at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant took place inside a vehicle that was nearly three decades old, inadequately serviced and in need of a functioning alarm system, according to the findings due for publication on Friday. Shortcomings in crisis procedures and preparatory efforts were also expected to be addressed in the forthcoming analysis.
“It was preventable,” Ted Wyka, the Energy Department head of the probe, said of last month’s fire. It burned for roughly half an hour before the salt-transport vehicle’s operator noticed flames rising from the engine area and unsuccessfully sought to douse them, he said.
The official added that alarm lights at the site took five minutes to begin blinking, and the reaction from central-control workers was unsatisfactory. Six of the facility’s 86 on-duty personnel received medical care for inhaling smoke, AP reported.
“We were pretty lucky that day,” Wyka said at a public gathering on Thursday. “Despite all the safety systems that sort of let them down, the workforce down in the mine that day was very calm, collected and in many ways heroic.”
He described the fire assessment shortly after URS, the waste site’s contract operator, said it had reassigned the president of its WIPP subsidiary to a lower-ranking post.
In that personnel change, Farok Sharif — who also previously headed the Nuclear Waste Partnership — is now expected to help find short-term destinations for nuclear waste slated for burial at the site, AP reported separately. Bob McQuinn, a 35-year veteran with experience in high-risk Energy Department nuclear-complex programs, will replace Sharif.
Underground portions of the complex have been off-limits since a Feb. 14 radioactive-material leak that was apparently unrelated to the vehicle fire.
“We are committed to returning WIPP to safe, compliant operations,” James Taylor, head of URS global operations, said in written comments. “I am confident these structural realignments will strengthen our recovery efforts.”
Officials are set in several weeks to issue separate findings on the radiological incident, which spread contamination to 17 personnel.
- 1 Smart Ideas: The Most Important Election of a 96-Year-Old’s Lifetime; Clinton’s Pitch to Millennials
- 2 Supreme Court Won’t Hear Case Involving Scott Walker’s Fundraising
- 3 The 1 Easy Way Donald Trump Could Have Been Even Richer: Doing Nothing
- 4 Edward Snowden: NSA Spies Most on Americans
- 5 The Fight for a Smaller, Stronger Republican Study Committee
What We're Following See More »
"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."
"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."
Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.