Is Air Force Losing Its Religion?

Members question top officials about reports that an academy cadet had to remove a Bible quote from a whiteboard.

National Journal
Jordain Carney
Add to Briefcase
Jordain Carney
March 14, 2014, 11:07 a.m.

Des­pite an on­go­ing fight about re­tir­ing the A-10 and in­vest­ig­a­tions in­to cheat­ing scan­dals, per­haps the most con­ten­tious mo­ment of a House com­mit­tee hear­ing on the Air Force budget on Fri­day fo­cused on re­li­gious free­dom.

Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Randy For­bes of Vir­gin­ia, who is in the run­ning to be the next Armed Ser­vices chair­man, asked about re­ports from earli­er this week that a ca­det at the Air Force Academy was forced to take a Bible quote down from a white­board.

“Per­haps the most of­fens­ive, the Air Force said this was a teach­ing mo­ment, that the ca­det’s ac­tion of put­ting the Bible verse on [the white­board] was in­ap­pro­pri­ate based on lead­er­ship prin­ciples,” For­bes said, adding that he was go­ing off of in­form­a­tion he re­ceived from the Air Force.

For­bes said he was told the ca­det “had no in­ten­tion to of­fend any­one or any group” and that the boards had been used in the past to dis­play in­spir­a­tion­al quotes. For­bes com­pared put­ting the Bible quote up to law­makers hanging an “In God We Trust” sign in their of­fices.

Air Force Sec­ret­ary De­borah Lee James said she was told by Lt. Gen. Michelle John­son, the su­per­in­tend­ent of the academy, that the ca­det was told by a class­mate that the Bible quote made them un­com­fort­able, and the ca­det offered to take it down.

But For­bes dis­puted that ac­count.

“No, ma­dame sec­ret­ary, that’s not true, by your own facts. If you’ll read what your li­ais­on of­ficer has giv­en to me, “¦ the Air Force com­mand­er “¦ went to that ca­det,” For­bes said. “… Can you ima­gine a young ca­det when he’s forced with the en­tire chain of com­mand com­ing in there and telling him ba­sic­ally this is in­ap­pro­pri­ate?”

But Gen. Mark Welsh, the Air Force’s chief of staff, pushed back, say­ing, “We re­move hun­dreds of quotes from those boards, be­cause they’re not in their room, they’re in the hall­way. They’re used for both per­son­al and pro­fes­sion­al mes­saging, just to make sure we all un­der­stand that con­text.”

Welsh stressed that the facts of what happened are still be­ing es­tab­lished.

But a hand­ful of Re­pub­lic­an com­mit­tee mem­bers backed For­bes and voiced their con­cerns over the re­ports.

GOP Rep. Mi­chael Con­away of Texas said he is wor­ried that “we have in­di­vidu­als who are so in­sec­ure and un­sure of them­selves that they can’t co­ex­ist with a free ex­pres­sion “¦ of tra­di­tion­al re­li­gious views.”¦ I won­der if they are the right folks for that busi­ness.”

And Re­pub­lic­an Rep. John Flem­ing of Louisi­ana cited an art­icle by Fox News’ Todd Star­nes over al­leg­a­tions that Gideons In­ter­na­tion­al, a Chris­ti­an or­gan­iz­a­tion, was not al­lowed to hand out Bibles at an Air Force base.

“You have to get the facts right on every one of these cases. And try and stay un­emo­tion­al un­til you know what happened,” Welsh said. “I would not be­lieve an art­icle by Mr. Star­nes, for starters.”¦ I know there are cases when he has not had his facts right in art­icles. I would be happy to ex­plain them to you, with him in the room.”

Welsh ad­ded that the “single biggest frus­tra­tion” of his job is “the per­cep­tion that some­how there is re­li­gious per­se­cu­tion in­side the Air Force. It is not true.”

Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Rob Bish­op of Utah ad­ded a light­hearted mo­ment to the spir­ited back-and-forths, ask­ing: “If I’m of­fen­ded by your budget, will you take it down?”

What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
1 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login