Everything You Need to Know About Your Business-Class Drone

Flying robots are awesome, and maybe even a great business model. But are they legal?

National Journal
Alex Brown
Add to Briefcase
Alex Brown
March 19, 2014, 8:23 a.m.

Jeff Bezos isn’t the only one who thinks drones will power to­mor­row’s busi­nesses. But as more com­pan­ies in­cor­por­ate drone de­liv­ery or pho­to­graphy in­to their plans, it’s still un­clear what they’re al­lowed to do.

“There’s a lot of mis­in­form­a­tion and mis­un­der­stand­ing in the [drone] user com­munity,” ac­know­ledged FAA spokes­man Les Dorr. The agency wants to clear up the con­fu­sion. So here’s a help­ful guide:

I have a bril­liant idea for how drones can help my busi­ness. Am I good to go?

Not un­less you’re op­er­at­ing in the Arc­tic. So far, the only op­er­a­tion that has re­ceived the ne­ces­sary Fed­er­al Avi­ation Ad­min­is­tra­tion clear­ance for com­mer­cial drone use is a com­pany that con­ducts pre­drilling en­vir­on­ment­al sur­veys in the Arc­tic. So, prob­ably not you.

Clear­ance for com­mer­cial op­er­a­tions “re­quires a cer­ti­fied air­craft, a li­censed pi­lot, and op­er­at­ing ap­prov­al,” ac­cord­ing to the FAA’s Eliza­beth Cory. The agency has been stingy with the op­er­at­ing ap­prov­al so far, and that’s un­likely to change un­til it gets more time to weigh con­cerns and troubleshoot po­ten­tial prob­lems.

But I just read that a court made drones leg­al now. What’s up with that?

Yes, a Na­tion­al Trans­port­a­tion Safety Board judge ruled against the FAA earli­er this month, es­sen­tially say­ing it doesn’t have the au­thor­ity to po­lice the un­manned skies. But the agency ap­pealed the fol­low­ing day, and you won’t be fly­ing any­where un­til things get settled by the NTSB. “The ap­peal has the ef­fect of stay­ing the de­cision,” Dorr said. “We were con­cerned that it could im­pact the safety of the na­tion’s air­space.”

I’m still OK if I fly be­low 400 feet, right?

Sorry. The 400-foot threshold was put in place for hob­by­ists. If you’re us­ing a drone to de­liv­er products for your busi­ness or take pic­tures you plan to sell or use for pro­mo­tion­al pur­poses, it doesn’t mat­ter how high you fly. The Wash­ing­ton Na­tion­als, bus­ted for tak­ing spring-train­ing pic­tures with a drone, ar­gued that the ma­chine flew lower than most of their pop flies. It doesn’t ap­pear to have helped their case.

So drones can’t help my busi­ness at all?

Not really. You can do what some busi­nesses have done — an­nounce a bril­liant (if far from feas­ible) drone-de­liv­ery plan, wait for the FAA to shut it down, and en­joy the free pub­li­city when it does. Dorr de­clined to spec­u­late on how many drone busi­ness mod­els are de­signed more for at­ten­tion than im­ple­ment­a­tion.

OK, it’s not leg­al — but will the FAA catch me?

It de­pends. It’s cer­tainly not easy for the agency to be aware of every small air­craft, but once your busi­ness drone be­comes well-known enough to ac­tu­ally be prof­it­able, it will prob­ably come to the FAA’s at­ten­tion. “We typ­ic­ally find out about com­mer­cial op­er­a­tions or un­safe op­er­a­tions,” Dorr said. Even for ones that don’t make the news, “people see one and they tell us.”

But, really, will I get in trouble?

You’ll prob­ably get a warn­ing. The FAA has only tried to levy one fine so far, and that was for reck­less fly­ing. “Our first goal is to get them to stop,” Dorr said. “Most of the people have been co­oper­at­ive…. We typ­ic­ally will only pur­sue a civil pen­alty in a case where care­less and reck­less op­er­a­tion is in­volved.”

The en­tre­pren­eurs be­hind a beer-de­liv­ery scheme and a flower drop-off plan said the FAA of­fi­cials who shut them down were po­lite and un­der­stand­ing. Giv­en the con­fu­sion over what the rules are, it doesn’t seem the agency is eager to pun­ish mis­in­formed busi­nesses.

So when will I get to fly my busi­ness drone?

Many people think the FAA has to have reg­u­la­tions in place by Sept. 30, 2015. The agency has already said it won’t meet that con­gres­sion­ally man­dated dead­line, and it takes is­sue with those who say it’s hold­ing up the sched­uled in­teg­ra­tion of drones in­to the air­space. “We have in­ter­preted [the con­gres­sion­al dir­ect­ive] to mean that we have to have a plan [by 2015], which we do,” Dorr said. “That does not mean all the rules have to be in place.”

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
1 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
1 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login