Congress intends to pass another short-term “doc fix” instead of the long-term solution physicians have been seeking for years, a House committee spokesman confirmed Wednesday.
Negotiations have stalled on a bipartisan bill that would repeal and replace the Medicare formula that pays doctors because leadership could not come to an agreement on how to pay for it.
Lawmakers must act by March 31 to avert an automatic cut to Medicare physicians’ pay. With seven days to go after Congress returns from recess next week, aides are preparing a short-term patch with the hope that it leads to more bipartisan work on the permanent solution, the spokesman said in an email.
Key stakeholders and policymakers on both sides of the aisle had been hopeful that they would finally pass a permanent fix to the sustainable growth rate formula that institutes automatic cuts to the entitlement program. The Congressional Budget Office gave the deal an 11-year, $138 billion price tag — one of the lowest estimates in recent attempts at a permanent fix — and things were looking up.
But in December, lawmakers pushed the negotiations further down the road in a last-minute budget agreement, and now the election year has both parties standing firm on how they feel the government should pay for the program.
Republicans even tied a delay of the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate to the bill as a pay-for, arguing that the Democrats had proposed no other alternatives. While that version of the bill passed the House last week, it’s going nowhere in the Senate, and it even got a White House promise to veto.
The news of another short-term patch will come as a blow to advocates of a permanent SGR fix. The American Medical Association, which represents doctors, held a conference in Washington earlier this month to lobby the Hill to get it done, meeting with leadership in both houses about their progress on the issue.
“Continuing the cycle of kicking the can down the road through temporary patches in the months ahead simply wastes more taxpayer money to preserve a bad policy of Congress’s own making,” said AMA President Ardis Dee Hoven in a statement after the sham vote on the individual mandate delay.
In all, Congress has spent upward of $150 billion since 2003 on 15 “doc fixes.”
What We're Following See More »
After keeping the information private for most of the lead-up to the debate on Monday, it has been revealed that longtime Clinton aide Philippe Reines has been playing the role of Donald Trump in her debate prep. Reines knows Clinton better than most, able to identify both her strengths and weaknesses, and his selection for a sparring partner shows that Clinton is preparing for the brash and confrontational Donald Trump many have come to expect.
- A national Washington Post/ABC News poll shows Clinton leading Trump by just two points among likely voters, 46% to 44%.
- A national Bloomberg poll out Monday morning by Selzer & Co. has Clinton and Trump tied at 46% in a two-way race, and Trump ahead 43% to 41% in a four-way race.
- A CNN/ORC poll in Colorado shows likely voters’ support for Trump at 42%, 41% for Clinton, and a CNN/ORC poll in Pennsylvania has Clinton at 45% and Trump at 44%.
- A Portland Press Herald/UNH survey in Maine has Clinton leading Trump in ME-01 and Trump ahead in ME-02.
More than 30 times, in the case of some donors. Long before Cruz endorsed Trump—and before he even snubbed the nominee at the Republican National Convention—"the senator quietly began renting his vast donor email file to his former rival, pocketing at least tens of thousands of dollars, and more likely hundreds of thousands, that can be used to bankroll the Texan’s own political future."
"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."
Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."