Don’t look for daylight between Janet Yellen and her predecessor Ben Bernanke, the new Federal Reserve Board chair said Wednesday.
“I think we are committed to exactly the same set of goals,” Yellen told reporters at a press conference following the Fed’s latest policy announcement. “I think he had a very good agenda and it’s one I shared. It’s why I came to Washington to be vice chair and it’s the agenda I expect to continue pursuing,” she said. Wednesday was the first meeting and press conference with Yellen as the central bank’s chair.
Still, Yellen is charting a fresh course for the central bank. It’s not one that Bernanke wouldn’t have taken, necessarily, but Yellen faces different challenges as she oversees the unwinding of the Fed’s crisis-era balance sheet and the eventual raising of interest rates. The Bernanke Fed said in December 2012 that it would keep interest rates low at least until the unemployment rate reached 6.5 percent, so long as inflation wasn’t straying too far from its long-run 2 percent target. (At the time the announcement was made, unemployment was 7.9 percent.) On Wednesday, with unemployment close to that threshold at 6.7 percent, the Fed scrapped that guidance altogether and pledged to look at a “wide range of information” when deciding to raise its benchmark interest rate, known as the federal funds rate.
“In determining how long to maintain the current 0 to 1/4 percent target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will assess progress — both realized and expected — toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation,” the Fed’s policy-setting group, the Federal Open Market Committee, said in a statement following a two-day meeting. “This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments.”
Yellen outlined at the press conference which labor-market conditions she’d be looking at most closely. She will be watching:
The standard unemployment rate (i.e. the 6.7 percent U.S. unemployment rate).
The U-6 rate, a broader measure of unemployment that includes “marginally attached” workers.
The number of individuals working part-time on an involuntary basis.
The number of “discouraged” and “marginally attached” workers.
The share of the labor force that has been unemployed for 27 weeks or more, aka the long-term unemployed.
The labor-force participation rate, which measures the percent of the population that is part of the labor force, working or looking for work. This has fallen dramatically in recent years, partly due to the aging of the population, but also partly due to the recession. How much of the decline is due to the former and how much is due to the latter is the subject of debate among economists today.
The rate at which people are quitting their jobs (a sign of a healthy labor market), the number of job openings, and the rate at which workers are getting hired to new jobs.
“If you ask about my dashboard, the dial on virtually all of those things is moving in a direction of improvement,” Yellen said.
Yellen also said the central bank was likely to raise interest rates around six months after the Fed ended a separate bond-buying program known as quantitative easing, or QE, which is aimed at bringing down longer-term interest rates. QE will now consist of $55 billion of Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities after seeing its third $10 billion cut since December in this policy statement, the Fed said Wednesday.
Thirteen of the Fed’s 16 policymakers believe the central bank is likely to start raising the federal funds rate in 2015, the Fed had said in a separate statement following the meeting. Still, markets fell after Yellen described the six-month window, which would likely put the timing of a rate hike somewhere around next spring or summer.
The Fed’s policymakers will next meet April 29-30.
- 1 Views of Homosexuality Differ Greatly by Region
- 2 Congress Passed a Cell-Phone Unlocking Bill. But It Won’t Do Much.
- 3 The Fight for a Smaller, Stronger Republican Study Committee
- 4 Wednesday Q+A with Ann Selzer
- 5 Smart Ideas: The Debate as a Microcosm of 2016, the Demise of North Korea, and the Libertarian Party’s Ceiling
What We're Following See More »
"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."
"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."
Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.