Just How Illegal Is Your March Madness Bracket?

Would a proposed online-gambling ban make your office pool a crime?

Your biggest bracket fear should be upsets, not jail time.
National Journal
March 20, 2014, 8:42 a.m.

If you’ve heard about new ef­forts this week to ban on­line gambling, you’re prob­ably won­der­ing what that means for your of­fice March Mad­ness pool. Your an­swer, if that’s the sort of thing you’re con­cerned about, should be: “What March Mad­ness pool?”

You see, while on­line gambling was pretty much leg­al­ized on the fed­er­al level in a 2011 Justice De­part­ment de­cision, the rul­ing came with one ex­cep­tion: sports bet­ting. DOJ’s leg­al coun­sel “has ana­lyzed the scope of the Wire Act … and con­cluded that it is lim­ited only to sports bet­ting,” Deputy At­tor­ney Gen­er­al James Cole wrote in Decem­ber of that year.

So while the feds won’t crack down on on­line poker (at least for the mo­ment), put­ting money on your brack­et is tech­nic­ally il­leg­al, in ad­di­tion to be­ing fool­ish (and def­in­itely not something this re­port­er has wasted un­told dol­lars on).

While Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham and Rep. Jason Chaf­fetz try to re­store the Wire Act’s far-reach­ing on­line-gambling ban, oth­er le­gis­la­tion adds to the con­fu­sion. The Un­law­ful In­ter­net Gambling En­force­ment Act, passed in 2006, al­lows games of skill such as poker and fantasy sports (ap­par­ently pre­dict­ing ath­letes’ stat­ist­ics is a skill game, while pre­dict­ing game out­comes is not).

Cur­rently, three states — Delaware, New Jer­sey and Nevada — have sanc­tioned on­line gambling. That would plum­met to zero if the Gra­ham-Chaf­fetz bill goes through. At the oth­er end of the spec­trum, Rep. Peter King pro­posed a bill last year that would leg­al­ize and stand­ard­ize on­line gambling.

In the mean­time, the on­line gam­ing world re­mains a mixed bag of state reg­u­la­tions and little-un­der­stood, scarcely en­forced fed­er­al laws. So even though the let­ter of the law says your March Mad­ness wager could carry two years of pris­on time, you prob­ably have noth­ing to worry about — ex­cept for that up­set you nev­er saw com­ing.

What We're Following See More »
CONTINUING OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION
House Democrats Subpoena Don McGahn
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler issued a subpoena to former White House counsel Don McGahn as part of a House-led obstruction investigation into President Donald Trump. The subpoena comes just days after special counsel Robert Mueller’s report revealed that McGahn witnessed and testified about potential obstruction of justice by Trump."

Source:
CAIN ASKED HIM NOT TO
Trump Won't Nominate Herman Cain for the Fed
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump said Monday that he would not nominate Herman Cain to the Federal Reserve after the former GOP presidential candidate asked him not to. Senate Republicans had warned the White House against naming the businessman and 2012 presidential hopeful to serve on the body's board of governors."

Source:
WANTS IT BY MAY 1
Nadler Subpoenas Unredacted Report
3 days ago
THE LATEST
ONLY TWO ARE KNOWN
Mueller Made 14 Criminal Referrals
4 days ago
THE LATEST
POSTED ONLINE
The Report Is Here
4 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login