No Doubt: Cantor Says House Republicans Will Do a Budget

House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) makes remarks during a news briefing at the U.S. Captiol March 25, 2010 in Washington, DC. Cantor said that leaders from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee have turned threats against Democrats who voted for the health care reform package into a political issue.
National Journal
Billy House
Add to Briefcase
Billy House
March 21, 2014, 1:17 p.m.

Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor said Fri­day that House Re­pub­lic­ans will, in fact, pro­duce a budget res­ol­u­tion this year.

Speak­er John Boehner said so last month. But doubts per­sisted, and some Re­pub­lic­ans even sug­ges­ted it would be bet­ter not to do one.

But in a memo sent out Fri­day by Can­tor to fel­low House Re­pub­lic­ans about the re­main­ing March and April agenda, he wrote, “We owe it to the Amer­ic­an people to demon­strate how we will al­loc­ate their tax dol­lars and bal­ance the budget.”

The House doesn’t ne­ces­sar­ily have to touch the budget is­sue, be­cause the two-year budget agree­ment already set top-line num­bers for 2015. Demo­crats who con­trol the Sen­ate already have said they won’t pass their own budget res­ol­u­tion.

However, without spe­cify­ing a date for when the House will ac­tu­ally vote on such a spend­ing blue­print, Can­tor in his memo went on to write, “While the pres­id­ent’s budget blows past the spend­ing lim­it pre­vi­ously agreed to, the House Re­pub­lic­an budget, un­der the lead­er­ship of [Budget Com­mit­tee] Chair­man Paul Ry­an, will ad­here to the agreed-upon spend­ing lim­its and bal­ance in 10 years.” Three oth­er bills touch­ing on budget re­form also will be taken up, he said.

Still, Can­tor’s an­nounce­ment comes amid nag­ging ques­tions about wheth­er such a plan could pass in the House, and wheth­er Re­pub­lic­ans should — or even have to — pro­duce a budget as they head to­ward Novem­ber’s elec­tions.

If such a budget ad­hered to spend­ing caps put in place by the two-year, $1.1 tril­lion budget deal passed in Decem­ber — which Ry­an helped cre­ate — pas­sage could be dif­fi­cult. Sixty-two House Re­pub­lic­ans voted against that meas­ure, mean­ing a sim­il­ar spend­ing plan would re­quire Demo­crat­ic sup­port for pas­sage. 

That could be a tough task if Re­pub­lic­ans turn their budget in­to a mes­saging vehicle that in­creases mil­it­ary spend­ing at the ex­pense of nondefense pro­grams, re­ject­ing the agreed-upon even split of $63 bil­lion in se­quester re­lief over two years.

Eli Zupnick, a spokes­man for Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray, said Fri­day, “The Mur­ray-Ry­an deal rolled back se­quest­ra­tion evenly between de­fense and non-de­fense and set clear spend­ing caps for each cat­egory for two years.”

“It would be un­for­tu­nate if the House reneged on that deal less than four months after it was agreed to and cre­ated un­cer­tainty in what should be a crisis-free budget pro­cess this year,” he said.

Even some Re­pub­lic­ans have sug­ges­ted not do­ing a budget, be­cause it could be a li­ab­il­ity with thorny de­tails that de­tract from broad­er, more con­cep­tu­al and suc­cess­ful Re­pub­lic­an at­tacks over the eco­nomy and Obama­care.

But oth­ers say an “as­pir­a­tion­al” budget filled with con­ser­vat­ive policy could draw more sup­port from the con­fer­ence and help in the elec­tion.

The con­gres­sion­al timetable sets the dead­line at April 15 — about three weeks away — for com­plet­ing ac­tion on the an­nu­al budget res­ol­u­tion for the new fisc­al year that starts Oct. 1.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
18 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×